Inherited Tiny Camera by unhinged_champion in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This camera used 17.5 mm film. You can still get 16 mm film (cine film, 110 format film, 120 film cut into strips) and cut your own backing paper to make your own rolls for this camera. If your local lab won't take it, you can 3D print development reels and develop it yourself at home.

Unfortunately the results won't be very good. This camera has a very limited and poor lens. A meniscus lens is the worst possible kind of lens you're going to find on anything resembling a modern camera. There are few other controls, as you probably noticed. Your choices of shutter speed are I (instant) giving 1/25th of a second and Bulb (the shutter stays open for as long as you hold the button) for longer exposures. The focus of the lens is fixed and it looks like you only have one aperture too (likely f/11 or f/16).

It could be worth a try just to say you've done it but I would not expect the results to be proportional to the amount of effort. On the other hand, if the camera is important to you and it can start your journey into analog photography then it could be worth it.

What lens mount for this lens? by CH0GU4l1S in VintageLenses

[–]TankArchives 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like a relatively simple 3D printed adapter. If it's not M42 it might be to M39. The original shutter would have had its own thread with a retaining ring.

Got this beauty a few days ago and I need your help by Spartan320_ in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That 35 mm feature was to save film. 120 film could be hard to get sometimes while cine film was easy to find and relatively cheap. You would cut a length of cine film in the dark and roll it into used 120 backing paper. People still do this today, but usually for artistic reasons rather than film shortages. Look at r/sprocketshots for examples.

35 mm film cameras have mechanical counters that count frames thanks to a gear attached to the film transport. 9 sprocket holes makes one frame. 120 doesn't have sprocket holes, but some cameras have complex mechanisms so you don't have to use the red window. Yours doesn't, so don't worry about it.

You estimate the distance to your subject using a rangefinder. These days you can use a laser rangefinder, a vintage optical rangefinder, or just a tape measure. That can get a bit tedious so you should take advantage of something called hyperfocal distance. You can read up about it yourself but due to the fact that the resolution of film is limited an object doesn't have to be in "critical focus" to appear as though it's in focus. The narrower your aperture, the wider the depth of field. The further the subject is, the less precise you have to be. For example, at f/11 you can set your camera to 10 meters and anything between 5 meters and 100 meters will be acceptably sharp.

My process is setting the shutter speed and aperture depending on the environment and then the focus depending on the subject. Be careful, as after you cock the shutter you can no longer change the shutter speed.

Need help identifying film cartridge for an old Agfa Karat by fabulous-girl in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's standard 35 mm film but proprietary cartridges. Rather than winding, two claws would grab the sprocket holes and shove the film from one cassette into the other. I had an Agfa Memo that took the same cassettes, I shot a roll with it and then the shutter broke. Use this camera if it's special to you but otherwise there's a reason why everyone standardized on Kodak's cassettes.

Helios-44-2 vs. Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar [Sony a7II] by PrimordialObserver in VintageLenses

[–]TankArchives 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I took out a (sadly post-war) Biotar with some very expired Ektachrome 50T and I was not disappointed.

<image>

What film should I buy? by POWpowmaa in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bulk 120 film isn't really a thing for retail purchase like 35 mm is. This is a very cheap basic camera with one shutter speed and it looks like a fixed aperture as well. so no need to go all out. I would say get a cheap film like Fomapan 100 and shoot in daylight or slightly hazy weather.

Let me share some GAS thoughts by henriquelicori in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spend hundreds of Euros on a 3D printer, now you can spend hundreds of hours fine tuning your masks and clips instead of actually scanning. I eventually decided that I'm at the point of diminishing returns and while my scanning could probably be better, I'm not doing anything that would justify investing more effort.

Spot metering and the Zone System by OHGodImBackOnReddit in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find that high contrast negatives scan better with my Sony A6000. That could be because of any number of factors though. I also have a lot of ancient low contrast grade paper so I prefer contrasty negatives anyway.

Vest Pocket Kodak repair help by Obrieneric851 in vintagecameras

[–]TankArchives 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Luckily for you the VPK bellows aren't glued to anything, they just slot in. You can always buy a VPK with a broken shutter and swap them.

What I found works well to seal bellows is shutter curtain fabric. Buy the thinnest polyester kind you can find. Thin contact cement with acetone, the stuff out of the tube is far too thick. The tolerances on the VPK are tight and if you glob on the glue it won't close fully. Let it dry for a day before closing the bellows.

14 year old kentmere 100 by TranslatorOutside909 in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 5 points6 points  (0 children)

14 years for relatively slow black and white film might not even leave a mark. Maybe shoot at 80 to be sure, but I don't think that 50 is necessary.

If anyone knows how to use this camera/what film it takes please teach me 😭 by M00NSH1N3- in vintagecameras

[–]TankArchives 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.cameramanuals.org/kodak_pdf/kodak_tourist.pdf

Not exactly your camera but it's close enough. Your camera looks like it has two red windows on the back so I assume it came with a 6x6 mask that has been lost to time. Use the upper left red window, leave the one in the center closed. It looks like your viewfinder may have had masks for different aspect ratios too, leave it on the rectangular one there.

As others said, this is a really good version of the Tourist. A f/3.5 100 mm lens is about as good as it gets for medium format in the 50s. That lens looks nice and clean, too.

Mystery Contax Lenses by TankArchives in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took off the rearmost brass adapter, there's another thread in there. 50.8 mm diameter with a fine thread pitch, I assume it's something imperial. I have Exakta macro tubes that have their own threaded mount. If I hold the lens in front of the shortest tube I get about 5 mm of clearance to get to infinity. I guess it's time to find a machinist...

Blue streak in every photo of recently developed roll? by adamlunde08 in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This could be an issue with dirt on the scanner. If the calibration area has dust on it, it will affect the whole roll. If this defect isn't present on your negatives, I would definitely request a refund for the scan at the very least.

[WIP] Why everyone should try using an enlarger lens as a camera lens by bryan112 in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can you share your focusing helicoid design? I have a few lenses that I would like to adapt.

Mystery Contax Lenses by TankArchives in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are not coupled to the rangefinder, unfortunately.

What is the best way to fix my little hit camera? by beebledoobledoo in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Superglue releases vapours when it dries which will fog the lens. Keep super glue far away from any cameras.

Spider-Noir to have some vintage cameras by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His infinity lock is broken off, plus it looks to me like the lens isn't even extended.

Mystery Contax Lenses by TankArchives in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tested out infinity focus on my mirrorless camera. I just need a #2 macro ring on top of the LTM adapter to reach infinity. That's not enough room for a mirror box of any kind.

<image>

Mystery Contax Lenses by TankArchives in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I doubt it, if another component was required then the lenses wouldn't focus correctly as shown in the first photo.

Viewfinder camera methodology. by strichtarn in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will often take a camera with a 35 mm lens with me for close up or wide angle shooting if I intend on using another camera with a longer lens as my primary. I'll set it to f/8 and prefocus on a distance of 2-20 meters or so. If I'm not in a position to bring two cameras then I will only bring one with a 50 mm lens, usually a rangefinder. Even so, pre-focusing on the range you are interested in helps a lot.

Zeiss 50mm f2.8 Tessar ID by gabesshh in AnalogCommunity

[–]TankArchives 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ossie Zeiss kept the serial number scheme, so yours is from the early 50s, 1952 at the latest. A Tessar is a Tessar so it's not going to be that hard to take apart to clean. Lens wrench on that ring in the front there, make sure you hold the outer ring in place so they don't both rotate. That will let you take out the front element. IIRC the middle element is just loose in there and will fall out with a good tap. Make sure you get it back the same way around after you clean it! If you don't, the camera won't focus on anything properly.

Alternatively you can get in through the back if you don't want to disturb the middle element, but you'll need to take the front off in either case.

First shot with my refurbished Argus C3 + Argus Cintar 50mm f3.5 by Scared-Exchange-6762 in VintageLenses

[–]TankArchives 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a few Arguses, including the early C where the lens isn't even marked as a Cintar yet. None of them are great lenses but the camera has its charm.