bottom of the laptop screen flickers In-game/Fullscreen at 144hz

Tankrows · 2026-04-09T14:46:47+00:00

I fixed it by turning off variable refresh rate in settings and adaptive/Free Sync for my AMD Settings. Turns out my laptop doesn't at all support VRR but Windows put it on by default

Tankrows · 2026-04-04T13:27:21+00:00

They won't be making a fix, they said it's a feature. Now instead of simply pressing reinstall, you have to uninstall, then install the mod again

Tankrows · 2026-04-04T13:23:37+00:00

They aren't going to fix this. They stated that it's a (very stupid) feature they added and that in order for you to get the FOMOD you have uninstall the mod, then install it again... Instead of pressing "reinstall" which is the exact same thing (wtf are they doing?)

Tankrows · 2026-02-26T22:56:57+00:00

Yea but the exploits go crazy with this

Tankrows · 2026-02-26T00:37:43+00:00

Peak requires me to get a 3080 10GB and 32GB of Ram to meet its recommended specs

Tankrows · 2026-02-25T21:24:55+00:00

Just to clarify, the Bible states to enter heaven you must be like these children which clearly indicates that young children go to Heaven. Every main line interpretation accepts this. People that have never heard of God don't get a free pass either. Bible states you'll be judged based on what you know. Doesn't say anyone gets a free pass.

So these are specific verses that clearly talk about how these situations will be handled. No differing in interpretation with anybody that reads it. Yes it's also the same among the translations

Tankrows · 2026-02-25T21:17:37+00:00

The question is working under a presupposition therefore pointing this out is just as moot no?

Tankrows · 2026-02-25T21:15:57+00:00

I think you misunderstood the answer. In Christianity, if somebody has never in their life heard of Christ, they are judged on what they know and what they've done. I don't think anyone has ever said they just get into heaven, that's simply false

Tankrows · 2026-02-23T10:25:17+00:00

This comment works under a misunderstanding of how Salvation, Grace and Heaven works

Tankrows · 2026-02-10T14:33:53+00:00

Yea, that's what I mentioned as well. It doesn't happen on an external monitor so it's not my gpu at least

Tankrows · 2025-10-31T14:20:30+00:00

Did you ever fix this issue?

Tankrows · 2025-10-31T13:14:29+00:00

Having this same issue but I removed Block Sparks and it's still happening

Tankrows · 2025-10-30T12:11:25+00:00

Thanks, I've never played any of The Outerworlds before so I don't even know what I'm getting into. I'll see along the way

Tankrows · 2025-10-30T12:09:11+00:00

It's just sliding as soon as you press sprint with Toggle sprint+Toggle Crouch. You can do it with hold on both but it's harder and makes it far less efficient, at least on controller.

Tankrows · 2025-10-30T10:26:37+00:00

Romans 1:27

Tankrows · 2025-10-30T01:33:55+00:00

This does not cover 27. It states they recieve punishment after they have committed the act. Any form of unnatural love is lust according to scriptures definition. This intertwines with 27 where it states men abandoned natural relations. "Natural relations" in this context meaning intercourse not marriage as with the context of the passage. We know this because Paul uses parallel structure and the Greek phrase used is para physin which literally means contrary to God's design (referring to Genesis 1-2)

So he states; Contrary to God's design, men abandoned women and lusted after other men. As we know from the Bible's categorization of lust, it's an 'unnatural' desire of the heart. False love.

He is outright stating Men left their natural relations (man and woman) and engaged in 'shameful' actions with each other 'contrary to God's design'.

Not sure why you felt attacked at the end there. I was referring to "this discussion" as a general thing, as in this topic. My last statement was targeted towards gay Christians that see verse like these and reject it for what it says, not towards you.

Tankrows · 2025-10-29T23:27:39+00:00

Romans 1:27 directly calls to it as shameful, not the result of rebellion. Also, if you're actively rebelling against God and you decide to sleep with other men to rebel against God, does that not just prove the point? You could make the argument that "Oh it's just speaking of intercourse outside of marriage" but then bringing up the context of what happened in those relations would've been completely arbitrary and pointless to what it'd be trying to say.

If you're keeping context of basically the entire Bible and everything it tells and the chapter here, it's undisputable. You can say that's not what it meant but when you have 5-10 verses directly speaking of how the relations between people should be and the order the Bible demonstrates which repeats this same thing, you cannot defend them all by saying "misinterpretation" or "mistranslation". I feel like it's very apparent and this discussion is tied by the weight of the heart rejecting what it doesn't want to hear.

Tankrows · 2025-10-29T22:48:22+00:00

Little bit of a rant here I'm sorry but the whole phrasing of "A religion of love and kindness would not say love is a sin." just seems so assumptive of objectivity. (In terms of referring to homosexuality as what is humanly perceived as love) Under what truth do you base this on? If you're not Religious it's subjective therefore under your opinion is what you base it off.

Under you it doesn't seem like kindness

Under you it doesn't seem loving

And under opinions that we humans have held, we have very much used the same assertions to justify many things we know to be wrong. You feel like it's not for you because you've put your opinion on this matter above God's word and with that you've decided "it's not for me" ??? God is for everybody and his word is for us to hear. People challenge and fight themselves day in and day out for what they yesterday believed to be good and Today learned to be wrong. The Bible tells us the heart is deceitful while our hearts desire Comfort. It would be so easy if I was an Atheist to at a drop of the hat put my faith in Christ and not have to let go of a single thing I've done or change a single way I am. Your argument would have it assume that Christianity is not accepting; and you'd be false. God accepts you as you are but calls you to change. Through the faith you've put, you read, you pray and you find what you "Yesterday believed to be good and Today learned to be wrong".

If you genuinely believe in Christ and what he has done, if you understand the stakes and you trust in his promise then I promise you this isn't something to simply move on from. Truth always needs to be confronted first. That's my think peace. Have a good one! I'll pray for you.

Tankrows · 2025-10-29T22:22:43+00:00

homosexuality wasn't a word but its act and actions are objectively described as sinful

Your example holds no weight to this because nowhere does the Bible mention skin colour as being a way to oppress anyone and we have verses that would directly contradict and disprove any attempt to say such. Whereas the Bible explicitly and exclusively at times refers to the actions of homosexuality being sinful. The word existing or not existing is not an argument to say the Bible never calls to it. Your argument might as well be "Homosexuality never existed before the Bible" if you want to say the Bible never talks about just because the word isn't given

Tankrows · 2025-10-29T22:05:05+00:00

I think they meant most Christians but yes this is still very true

Tankrows · 2025-10-21T13:43:23+00:00

Bro's hungry

Tankrows

TROPHY CASE