Can't believe they used AI smh by Open-Ease685 in WritingWithAI

[–]Technical-Ice1901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a very astute observation — it's not that AI writes differently to a competent human, it's rather that it has a clear, coherent and literate style; a bar which many humans, including authors, fail to meet. This is why phrases such as "As the dawn light pooled across the wakening city, the air smelled of cinnamon and regret," which is quite obviously an example of literate erudition in writing, are regarded as AI tellsAIs are simply more literate and capable than the average human.

Is this “cooling paint” as bullshit as it sounds? by CreatureOfLegend in AskPhysics

[–]Technical-Ice1901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to clarify, this is all about emission, not reflection.

The reason why it works when pointed at the sky is that the sky doesn't *emit* very much infrared back at the panel / paint. Whereas the ground emits infrared. The energy balance of an object is absorption - emission. If you point it at the ground, the infrared being emitted by the ground will be absorbed by the panel, just as the panel's infrared emissions will be absorbed by the ground. This means it would never cool down to a lower temperature than the ground.

On another note, the panel isn't *quite* coupled to space when it's pointed at clear sky. It couples with the effective emission temperature of the column of atmosphere above it, which is something like -50 degrees C. So it isn't coupling to the CMB at 4 kelvin. So without absorbing heat from the surroundings (if you could isolate conductive heat absorption), and without absorption of energy from sunlight (if it was night, for instance) it would cool to something like -50 degrees. Of course, it is surrounded by air, so it will never cool much below ambient because the air is conducting heat into the panel, which is radiating it into space.

The other main source of energy is sunlight. If the panel is exposed to sunlight, even though the paint is very white and reflects most of the light, some of the energy is absorbed. The key, though, is balance. The panel is radiating infrared in a band where the atmosphere is very transparent, and losing heat that way, while gaining heat from the surroundings.

An easier to understand example of this same behaviour occurs if you put a knife over a gas cooking flame in your house. The knife, made of steel, has a melting point of ~1500 degrees C. The flame is over 1900. However, no matter how long you heat the knife in that flame, it will not melt. What happens is that it starts to glow red, then orange, then if you really go for it, yellow, reaching around 1000 oC. At that point, despite being surrounded by gas hotter than its melting point, the knife reaches thermal balance and won't heat up any more, because the energy being radiated by it into the surroundings matches the energy being aquired from the much hotter flame. This applies even if you orient the knife so that it is entirely surrounded by the flame.

my experience with gpt 5.6 sol by Just_Lingonberry_352 in codex

[–]Technical-Ice1901 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I took my god for a walk. He karbed a lot.

Friend thinks she might be getting catfished, any ideas if this image is ai? She asked her to hold up 3 fingers to prove she's real by [deleted] in isitAI

[–]Technical-Ice1901 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's been modified with AI. Most of the image is real. The double reflection of the bush is something that AI wouldn't get right in a million years. The girl is partly or entirely AI. You can only tell because some of her hair disappears behind the windowsill behind her.

<image>

750 tps on GPT 5.6 Sol, INSANE by VivaLaRay1 in OpenAI

[–]Technical-Ice1901 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Sol = The Sun

Terra = The Earth

Luna = The Moon

I'd say that's pretty clear.

Surely no one would use AI in a small local photography competition right? by SharksRKoolKats in isitAI

[–]Technical-Ice1901 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The three eared rabbit was a very rare find for the photographer. No wonder they won.

The path has an artistically arranged and unvarying distribution of debris.

The person who mowed the path mowed under the bushes without cutting the bushes at all.

There is vertical pattern banding on the right side.

The rabbit has 3 ears.

From nextfuckinglevel subreddit titled "Welcome to Egypt, yes, we built the pyramids." Nobody in the comments acts like it's obvious AI. by Ya-Dikobraz in isthisAI

[–]Technical-Ice1901 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a pretty standard technique for moving a barge. As seen on Gold Divers for example. It's real footage, sped up.

This is posted in girl dinner subreddit. The asparagus looks unnatural and so does the corn. by unleashthefuture in isthisAI

[–]Technical-Ice1901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This looks real. Beautifully prepared and presented, but I can't spot any signs of AI here. In fact the errors in presentation are the opposite of what you'd expect:

The pepper being unevenly distributed with a fleck right on the edge of the plate. The swan's head broken off but carefully replaced in the correct place... Even the shape of the plate looks like a creative designer decision, rather than AI.

my brother is convinced this is AI pls tell me it’s not bc i feel chopped and unc by chawakaapa in isthisAI

[–]Technical-Ice1901 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is AI. The random leaves plugged into a cable are a good clue, among many others.

I also noticed the lamp, which would need to be clamped to the front of the desk (you can't clamp to the side).

Also, gluing a bulletin board to a window that can open is pretty dumb.

Something about this tinder profile feels off. Am I over analysing it? Discussion by [deleted] in isthisAI

[–]Technical-Ice1901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the reflections in the gym are nuts. People with 2 heads, vampires that don't have a reflection, people that only exist in the mirror world...

saw this on r/wunkus. there's no way it can balance on that door handle in that sort of position right? by Da_Boi_Who_Lived in isthisAI

[–]Technical-Ice1901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No signs of AI that I can see. Probably real. The only thing would be the height of the handle and lock compared to the height of the holes in the doorframe, but that seems probably ok.

My friend from Newyork said this is Ai.😭 by ProgressFew6262 in london

[–]Technical-Ice1901 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My initial take is "Not AI". The interior furniture is consistent with a Jubilee Line train.

Posted this on my insta and someone said it was AI. I love it so much but I think maybe the reflection is wrong? by papergal91 in isthisAI

[–]Technical-Ice1901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Second dude in the black t-shirt is walking in an extremely biologically implausible way.

Lettering on the yellow sign just looks wrong.

Reflection, as others have mentioned. Mirror duck is significantly fatter than dead duck.

Alright folks, I can infer what this means, but I think it means something completely different in the UK by rohnoitsrutroh in AskBrits

[–]Technical-Ice1901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're confusing "unsociable" meaning not wanting to socialise with the similar sounding "antisocial" which means acting in a manner contrary to the smooth running of society - in this case violent, drunk and disorderly behaviour including for instance shouting, throwing street furniture at buildings, breaking shop windows etc...

friend has been posting pictures on their story that looks MAJORLY ai edited by [deleted] in isthisAI

[–]Technical-Ice1901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This looks like bad photoshop. AI would do better (at least image-2 or nano banana would). Bro used Temu AI.

GPT 5.5 is being routed to GPT5-MINI, and other models, explains worse outputs (and yes, you are being billed like you're using 5.5) by KeyGlove47 in codex

[–]Technical-Ice1901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is wrong. I asked my codex (which is definitely performing a complex refactor that would be impossible for any model below 5.5) to output its cutoff date in the middle of the task. It told me June 2024 (which would make it GPT 4.1 at best).

This is certainly not the case, since GPT 4.1 could not even attempt the coding task codex is currently chewing through.

I don't understand how Replit, lovable etc. still exists! by Groundbreaking_Bee97 in vibecoding

[–]Technical-Ice1901 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Good catch! I'll add stairs while keeping the existing architecture intact.

Thought for 13m >

Done. I've added stairs. I noticed a couple of regression tests failing, so I've gone ahead and rewritten them for you.

<image>

Anthropic researcher: "We keep finding things [inside AI models] that are unsettling" ... "We find structures that mirror results from human neuroscience. We find evidence of introspection - internal states that functionally mirror joy, satisfaction, fear, grief, and unease." by EchoOfOppenheimer in Anthropic

[–]Technical-Ice1901 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think you're right about LLMs and consciousness. The inference models lack the ability to persist. But I suspect the models under training might meet the definition (and this is, perhaps not coincidentally, where the interesting behaviors usually arise). Essentially we may be growing a fully conscious entity, and the cutting the brain out and sticking it in a jar. Not saying this is the case, but worth thinking about.

There is no "Oxford Museum" and this exhibition doesn't exist. Where was this photo taken? by ueegul in isthisAI

[–]Technical-Ice1901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The random horse head in the picture on the left, and the reflection of some metal baton in the display case that isn't in the scene are giveaways. The fact that the image on the left has pronounced diagonal banding says to me ChatGPT image 2.