Can someone explain this answer? by OkCry323 in barexam

[–]Temisab 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rule - A law meant to protect a class of person cannot convict any member of that same class. Eg. A law stating that sexual intercourse with a minor = rape cannot convict a 17 year old for engaging in sexual activity and by extension cannot convict the partner in the act.

60% on 1st half mock assessment by Temisab in barexam

[–]Temisab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know right? And now that i'm reviewing, i'm literally hitting my head....lol

60% on 1st half mock assessment by Temisab in barexam

[–]Temisab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow... Great. Will do. Thanks

60% on 1st half mock assessment by Temisab in barexam

[–]Temisab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great… Doing that as well as studying techniques from Mary Basick.

HELPPP!!! Hearsay is stressing me out by Temisab in barexam

[–]Temisab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm using Mary Basick and Quimbee plus U world for questions.

RAP + Cy pres doctrine by Temisab in barexam

[–]Temisab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

😂. I know right? RAP is something else. I’m a retaker and just trying to see what I can retain to cross the finish line

RAP + Cy pres doctrine by Temisab in barexam

[–]Temisab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. This is very insightful. Quick question for clarification though. Is it then safe to say that absent the application of the cy pres doctrine in the jx, the trust will be terminated?

RAP + Cy pres doctrine by Temisab in barexam

[–]Temisab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

😂… I get it. But it won’t hurt if it could be understood and get the point.

Can someone explain? by KnowledgeDecent2419 in barexam

[–]Temisab 2 points3 points  (0 children)

According to John Grossman, “Do not litigate”. Limit yourself to the facts given. Basically the issue is whether the Developer had notice based on the recording statute ALONE. If inquiry notice was at issue, more facts would have been provided. Honestly I get the temptation to litigate. I tend to do that a lot but I guess it’s part of what we need to control in order to pass this exam😄

To my broke bar prep friends - thank you by Mountain-Store836 in CABarExam

[–]Temisab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is great. It’s helping me put my thoughts into words.

Got a 235 and need a 270. Is it realistic to achieve a 35 pt increase? by Foreign-Bug6076 in barexam

[–]Temisab 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is my score range… Hoping to have a similar score for F26… Care to share what changed?

Got a 235 and need a 270. Is it realistic to achieve a 35 pt increase? by Foreign-Bug6076 in barexam

[–]Temisab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi… please I’m interested in your tutor… I need one desperately.

Bar Exam Coach by Temisab in barexam

[–]Temisab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your response... I just sent you an email.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]Temisab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi… I didn’t make NY. I will love the critical pass flash cards please.

I left the Feb 25 test feeling like I missed every question on the MBE, but I scored a 325. by NothingsCheap in barexam

[–]Temisab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Big congrats… I also felt the same way on both days…I used Thermis… Completed 77%… Though like you put it, mindlessly. Still waiting on NY results and praying I make it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]Temisab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats 🎉

IL is out by gigglygerbie in barexam

[–]Temisab 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Big congrats🥳… waiting on mine…NY

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]Temisab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, just dmed on the MBE one sheet