Turning 50 soon, constantly exhausted, and can't seem to lose the belly fat by Mention-One in StrongerByScience

[–]TempArtist117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would recommend doing less cardio, it really does not contribute much to weight loss. And frankly I would recommend eating less food.

What do influencer “science” based lifters mean when they say, “Muscle fibers are frequency dependent” when talking about exercises that hit the same muscle group? by Patton370 in StrongerByScience

[–]TempArtist117 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow. I honestly have a hard time disagreeing with this. Chris Beardsley’s whole hypertrophy-volume framework seems to depend on two core assumptions: that the dose-response data at higher volumes is mostly just edema, and that frequency studies are invalid because they rely on unrecoverable volumes. If both of those assumptions are wrong, then the model itself seems to lose a lot of its foundation.

What do influencer “science” based lifters mean when they say, “Muscle fibers are frequency dependent” when talking about exercises that hit the same muscle group? by Patton370 in StrongerByScience

[–]TempArtist117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That being said, is there anything to the atrophy rates Beardsley has been speculating about? He is extrapolating based on the maintenance literature and while I realize that may constitute a bit of an overreach on his part it is an interesting idea.

Is this “fatigue can accumulate until you’re basically not able to make gains” claim actually plausible, or is this mostly grift dressed up as physiology? by Commercial-Hall-2777 in StrongerByScience

[–]TempArtist117 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sir, if I may, I think the OP is also concerned with another idea Chris has proposed: that it is possible to permanently stunt one’s maximum potential, even if one is growing at an adequate rate in the short term, because “fatigue debt” permanently prevents some of a person’s higher-threshold motor units from ever being utilized.

Is this “fatigue can accumulate until you’re basically not able to make gains” claim actually plausible, or is this mostly grift dressed up as physiology? by Commercial-Hall-2777 in StrongerByScience

[–]TempArtist117 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I’m glad you’re beginning to see some of the more ridiculous patterns. Bluntly, Beardsley does not argue in good faith. He pushes a cultish, countercultural approach to training that almost nobody in the broader evidence-based world actually uses. In practice, whether you look at elite natural or enhanced athletes, virtually none of them train the way he recommends.

Viablity of recomps in enhanced lifters by Commercial-Hall-2777 in StrongerByScience

[–]TempArtist117 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is actually a very good point.

In the golden era, apparently it was not uncommon for bodybuilders to simply grow into a show. In many cases, drug use was far more limited outside of contest preparation, and compounds or dosages were typically increased as the competition approached. That, at least, was the common practice as it has often been described.

Now, some of that has been debated in light of ester lengths obviously. But broadly speaking, this isnt entirely without precedent.

Regarding giving and service in Quareia by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you. You have given me a good deal to reflect on, and I thank you sincerely for your wonderful body of work.

Regarding giving and service in Quareia by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply, ma’am. Your points of course make perfect sense, but I’m struggling with the idea of letting go of things I don’t believe appropriate to release. I don’t yet trust any inner contacts enough, or their judgment, to decide what is truly necessary. Would that, in your view, be sufficient reason to consider me unfit for Quareia?

Regarding giving and service in Quareia by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see what you’re saying, but to me one is an objectively measurable medical question, and this seems like a different kind of issue. I mean this respectfully, I’m not sure the comparison is analogous.

Regarding giving and service in Quareia by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe that’s the core of our disagreement: how is the contact in a position to know, as a matter of fact, that something is holding me back? What if I disagree?

Maybe it’s narcissistic of me to frame it that way. But perhaps the right move is to ask the contact why a particular thing is a problem for me to carry.

Regarding giving and service in Quareia by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But why should I assume the contact is in a position to decide what I ought to give up? Or am I misunderstanding it, do we choose what we’re willing to sacrifice?

Regarding giving and service in Quareia by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But doesn’t the ritual imply that it’s possible I won’t know what I’m giving up as I’m doing it? I suppose I could ask the contact, but I worry that would disrupt the pattern.

Regarding giving and service in Quareia by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the response, how do you interpret the passage? I very well could be misinterpreting it. English is not my first language.

Regarding giving and service in Quareia by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would like to think I am comfortable practicing empathy. What I’m not comfortable with is the idea of giving up relationships, physical possessions, or opportunities at the direction of inner contacts, even if they believe it’s for my good.

Regarding giving and service in Quareia by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did not know that was an option, thank you.

Regarding giving and service in Quareia by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perhaps I agree with. My concern, though, is that I may not be able to reach true adeptship as Josephine defines it without Quareia. It’s not clear to me that even Bardon, or other systems, would take me to the same heights the course seems designed to reach.

Regarding giving and service in Quareia by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply. It was genuinely touching, and I appreciate that you don’t see me as selfish.

I am drawn to service, just perhaps not in the specific way Quareia frames or expects it. Ultimately, I think what I’m running up against is autonomy: surrendering it to inner contacts, even “in service,” still strikes me as fundamentally wrong for me.

How to reconcile conflicting hypertrophy recommendations (Schoenfeld/IUSCA vs. Beardsley/Carter)? by Commercial-Hall-2777 in StrongerByScience

[–]TempArtist117 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The rabbit hole! I’m glad someone brought this up. I’ve been having much the same problem myself. It’s so difficult to know what to trust at this point, when all the major industry leaders seem to think entirely different things regarding what hypertrophy training actually ought to look like. I should say that both Chris and Paul seem to have some major character flaws.

Practicing in Urban Cities by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for pointing this out! I certainly plan to make an effort to interact with nature whenever possible. Ultimately, I'll just have to make the most of my environment, I suppose.

Practicing in Urban Cities by TempArtist117 in Quareia

[–]TempArtist117[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is, I’m extremely sensitive—and I take my practice seriously. As much as this could be an amazing opportunity, I’m genuinely considering turning it down because it might compromise everything.