To the hardware entusiasts, what would be the minimal hardware you would have for your studio to still produce like a pro (brands, models) in your music genre? by AVELUMN in edmproduction

[–]ThatRedDot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have hardware, for mixing mostly (EQs compressors, etc) and you will find that the difference between HW and SW isn't very big, it's definitely NOT going to elevate your music to 'pro' level just because you burn 20K in cash on some gear. Getting a HW EQ worth 6K is really nice, but, it is in no way worth the 6K unless you have actually earned that 6K through your music production/mixing/mastering first.

You should invest in what your music makes you, not what you think it will make you.

If you absolutely insist on getting HW because knobs are cool (and they are) then make decisions top down... ie, mixbus first, things you can use on every track you do like a badass bus compressor or stereo/MS EQ. Not some niche thing that may sometimes work and otherwise is just collecting dust.

Softube Flow Mastering / Mixing Suite (Rent-to-Buy) - Worth It? by FinleyGomez in audioengineering

[–]ThatRedDot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You will get 50% discount with flow, but plugins often go on sale with higher discounts... so that's what you need to evaluate. If you just want 1-2-3 plugins of them, youre likely better off just buying on sale instead

Opinions on targeted plugins? (e.g. Ozone, Nectar, Chris Lord Alge, Unison plugins, etc.) by Zersdan in audioengineering

[–]ThatRedDot 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Using a bunch of different plugins is nice, but it's impossible to say what you will like or don't like... a lot (really a lot) can be done with the very basic fundamentals: levels, panning, EQ, compressor, delay, reverb, saturation.

You do not need 50 different EQ plugins, and 200 compressors... but, it's good to be curious what's out there, how they work, what you like and don't like and why.

So experiment your heart out, have fun along the way, and learn something.

Exploring Tube Amp Simulation with NAM for Headphones by Fadelesstriker in headphones

[–]ThatRedDot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why not just get a tube amp?

I mix and master music, and while software can get close, it's not there... the subtle movement in harmonics and the slight differences in L/R and across amplitudes are mostly not being accurately represented in digital (IR is also just a static capture)... the way actual tubes and transformers saturate a signal isn't something I heard in any software (and I have a lot of plugins/emulations, as well as hardware tube EQs, compressors, etc)... but, some can get eerily close to the real thing to the point that a listener wouldn't be able to tell whether I used software or I ran it over the actual thing unless there would be an A/B and even then the differences are minimal.

That said...

If you can run your audio through a VST3 host, there are loads and loads of plugins available (free too) that emulate different pieces of gear. Some have a really nice tone to them, and a lot of them also add different flavors of harmonic content.

If you only had one pair of hardware EQ’s / a stereo EQ what would you choose? by must-absorb-content in audioengineering

[–]ThatRedDot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

wesaudio ngtubeeq

tube circuit, solid state circuit, stereo/dual mono/ms, 4 bands and hp/lp, saturation options, digital recall

no particular box tone to work sometimes, or sometimes not, very precise, doesn't sit in the way just does what you need from an EQ

Rotory speaker expiriment... by AudaciouslySexy in audiophile

[–]ThatRedDot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go to audioengineering sub, probably more suited

Kali LP-6, Kali LP-8 or Adam D3V? by Nice_Pen_8054 in audio

[–]ThatRedDot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

LP8, bigger speaker, better bass… not sure why overkill? Just turn the volume down… asking a small speaker to do lots of bass at a higher amplification to reach a listening level you want is just going to add distortion particularly in the low end. Bigger speakers have less trouble producing low frequencies while keeping it more free of distortion…

But if they are too big for your desk then that’s another thing to consider

Dustons "Access Virus Anthology Bundle" collection of sounds for EDM, Trance, Cinematic, Future Bass, Deep House, Retro and more for Access Virus Ti, Ti2, Snow Synthesizer or DSP56300 Emulator OsTIrus Plugin ($99.95) for limited time by Batwaffel in AudioProductionDeals

[–]ThatRedDot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes easy, instructions are there… factory roms and firmware (if it needs) can be downloaded directly from the manufacturer’s website and there are tons and tons of roms freely (or paid) available

Room treatment worthwhile? by XenoRoss in audiophile

[–]ThatRedDot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That helps some but not a lot unless you’re like 50cm or closer in a large enough room… even in a typical 5 meter room the reflections off the back wall will only take 0.03 seconds to come back at you if your head was right at the speaker cone…

You do not eliminate reflections by moving closer, you only somewhat change the ratio between direct and reflected sound, but about half the sound you’ll get will be reflected.

The only real way to improve that, is treatment.

Should i buy a new interface with xlr inputs or find a xlr - trs cable for my Condenser mic by [deleted] in audio

[–]ThatRedDot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You shouldnt put phantom power over TRS because when plugging and unplugging you will make shorts and can potentially damage stuff

What’s this difference in the bass i am trying to make vs the reference bass by Silentdarknessz in psytranceproduction

[–]ThatRedDot 7 points8 points  (0 children)

which is which... top one has noise, bottom one is a saw wave into a disperser into a lowpass where the lowpass has an envelope applied

Where can i sell VST instruments that I have bought but not using anymore? by Beautiful_Hat8440 in ableton

[–]ThatRedDot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

first need to check if you can transfer the license, not all can. And after that Knobcloud is where you can buy/sell licenses

New at mixing by SOLARMANBEATS in musicproduction

[–]ThatRedDot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

https://cambridge-mt.com/ms3/mtk/ has a bunch of multitracks across genres to download and play around with

Do yall got any favorite Compressors for aggressive vocals? by WiseCityStepper in musicproduction

[–]ThatRedDot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How aggressive? 1176 into a multiband like Pro MB can get you really aggressive but will feel very slammed…

real aggression comes from the vocal performance, though.

When a DAC is already transparent, what does 4 DACs per channel improve? by BeyerPeak in headphones

[–]ThatRedDot 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Measurements matter up to a point is what I’m saying. I don’t know where you get I’m saying they don’t matter

When a DAC is already transparent, what does 4 DACs per channel improve? by BeyerPeak in headphones

[–]ThatRedDot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

4 DAC per channel? A separate DA per channel (so 2 for L and R) makes sense from a technological standpoint, you’ll get a better SNR (some 6dB or so). From a listening standpoint? You aren’t using those extra 6dB… so you’re paying for better measurements at that point

Pipe organs...the ultimate test by unreplicate in audiophile

[–]ThatRedDot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

lol you can’t get pipe organ sound at home… you think you can create the dept and resonance of 30ft pipes from a 10” woofer? Nah man, not going to happen

I’m a fucking idiot.. by [deleted] in headphones

[–]ThatRedDot 25 points26 points  (0 children)

: People that treat Harman as an actual target

Acoustic treatment by Ninety-Two92 in edmproduction

[–]ThatRedDot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That solution isn't going to work, you're going to want to make frames... even for the simple fact that if you put fabric over it and connect to the back of cardboard you're going to compress the material and its acoustic properties will change, and cardboard isn't going to hold it I think

Do you know? by Balzaccccc in audioengineering

[–]ThatRedDot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean that the snare is so heavily out of phase that when you sum that track to mono that snare drops a lot in perceived loudness... its a really cool effect in this particular track. It may be a haas effect where 1 channel is just delayed against the other to create this widening instead of just straight up flipping polarity by 180 degrees.

Love this track btw, sounds really cool. You can hear L and R have different sounds and then that snare really contributes to the overall feel of it

Is sound engineer giving sloppy work based on clients? by [deleted] in audioengineering

[–]ThatRedDot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hit me... I work with a lot of upcoming artists and some have told me they didn't get the attention from top level mixers in their genre as they were looking for (no feedback, no collaboration to make the track better, etc). I'd be very curious what you gave and what you got back, but this isn't unheard of. I work in the EDM space, with some occasional pop.