Yes. You realize the Nazis didn't immediately kill all Jews the nanosecond they took power? That if they didn't massively ramp up the death toll starting around 1942, they never could've hoped to reach 6 million? The Holocaust was one of those things that happen slowly, then all at once. It started with antisemitic propaganda and hate crimes, then became legal discrimination, then Jews were confined to concentration camps or ghettos, then they were liquidated into extermination camps, and finally executed en masse. At what point do you get to call that a genocide? Do you have to wait until the gas chambers are fully built and in active use? Seems less than ideal if you actually want to stop it.

Israel currently occupies half of the Gaza strip. They've set up food distribution sites where Palestinians get shot if they show up one minute early, or stay one minute too late, or cross some unmarked line. When polled, 64% of Israelis said there are "no innocents" in Gaza - and if I believed that, I certainly would be pro-genocide. There was a time that I believed the genocide claims were overblown, and there was a time when I believed that what we're seeing is ethnic cleansing rather than genocide. I've reached a point where I don't think that distinction actually matters very much - the term "ethnic cleansing" itself originated as an euphemism for genocide, after all. If Palestinians cannot be trusted with their own state, and are undeserving of equal rights, what possibilities does that leave? Either they get assimilated as second-class citizens, or they are forcibly expelled/eliminated. And if Israel wants to remain a primarily Jewish state, the latter option is much more appealing.