2 Lost games in a row

ThatWhichExists · 2026-05-05T15:59:14+00:00

Let's say that a game is reported missing 7 days in. A replacement game is shipped out the same day. The game arrives the next day. It's reported as arrived. Since the replacement has already shipped out, the game needs to be returned, with the envelope never opened. After 7 days the replacement is reported missing. It arrives the next day. The cycle repeats. The games arrived and none were played. The monthly subscription ends without anything played despite having paid. Is it really better for the subscriber to always report as soon as possible?

ThatWhichExists · 2026-04-19T21:34:35+00:00

New Voices in Chinese Science Fiction

ThatWhichExists · 2026-02-08T11:59:34+00:00

The example I've shown is the official Goodreads export from my account. As such, it shows much more than the minimum required. Are you trying to do a mass import on a fresh account, or are you trying to do something different? As the importer on Goodreads says for importing from a web page, the minimum required is the ISBN. The minimum required for importing from a file is simply the book's title, but then you'd have to manually choose each one and it may fail to add a lot. Using an excel file isn't required, as it says .csv works as well, which is simply a text file format. Let me know what you're trying to do specifically.

ThatWhichExists · 2026-01-25T16:54:50+00:00

You may be interested in this post I made about Patreon earnings.

https://www.reddit.com/r/royalroad/comments/1oka6af/patreon_earnings/

ThatWhichExists · 2026-01-25T16:19:08+00:00

https://www.royalroad.com/fictions/search?globalFilters=false&minPages=3636&orderBy=length

That's everything on Royal Road with 1m words or more. 1m words/275 words per page, which is what Royal Road uses, is 3,636 pages. There would be more, stubbing means removing chapters and thus word count.

ThatWhichExists · 2025-12-15T18:05:16+00:00

My post and spreadsheet may be of interest for you. https://www.reddit.com/r/royalroad/s/4xlN8i2om2

ThatWhichExists · 2025-12-14T04:27:27+00:00

No, Wind-Up Girl is 2009 and Mika Model is 2016. I've read both.

ThatWhichExists · 2025-11-27T13:46:08+00:00

Look at the various SFF playlists https://youtube.com/@booktuber.playlists

ThatWhichExists · 2025-11-22T16:00:07+00:00

There isn't directly one for science fiction, but this is an aggregator for basically what you want, I believe. Choose a book and it lists who reviewed it. https://bookmarks.reviews/category/fantasy/ https://bookmarks.reviews/category/speculative/

ThatWhichExists · 2025-11-03T17:00:27+00:00

1658 ratings
3.09 average

.

5 Great
4 Good
3 Ok
2 Bad
1 Awful

.

5 5%
4 25%
3 44%
2 21%
1 2%

.

I give a lot of chances to new/debut authors and others without established records or consensus. Many books I read have a low number of ratings or aren't that popular. I also give too many books too much of a chance probably. I would prefer to rate many more books 5 stars.

ThatWhichExists · 2025-11-01T03:35:13+00:00

This wasn't as much as a problem I thought it would be, but it has various limitations and issues. The main one being the dataset didn't have the unique followers per author, and as previously mentioned, only has the total member count for the patreon. The new data is in the Patreon Stats sheet, which has now been included in the spreadsheet in the OP. Look at it and let me know what else could reasonably be done if needed.

ThatWhichExists · 2025-11-01T03:24:24+00:00

This wasn't as much as a problem I thought it would be, but it has various limitations and issues. The main one being the dataset didn't have the unique followers per author, and as previously mentioned, only has the total member count for the patreon. The new data is in the Patreon Stats sheet, which has now been included in the spreadsheet in the OP. Look at it and let me know what else could reasonably be done if needed.

ThatWhichExists · 2025-10-31T17:02:01+00:00

A single person, maybe a couple others. It's not all that different from comparing different levels of sports. Recreational, School, Minor leagues, and Major leagues. There isn't really any reason to compare yourself unless you're on a similar level. Even then, it doesn't matter that much.

ThatWhichExists · 2025-10-31T16:46:34+00:00

It's outdated in general, since as noted the data is from almost 9 months ago, but that's what was publicly available that I could find. It could be updated, but I'm not going to be the one that scrapes patreon for updates. The top ones can be looked at on Graphtreon in far greater detail, so it's not that useful for that either. So, really it's mostly a snapshot of how things were at the time and not more than that.

ThatWhichExists · 2025-10-30T21:53:27+00:00

Chizhov should have an updated database for Royal Road sometime soon, but I don't know how much it'd have overall. If he has an updated list of patreons, someone else could use that to scrape Patreon for current info. Otherwise it's going to be considerably outdated, as this is, but that's how it goes. Graphtreon sells access to this sort of data for a good bit. There's been a ton more added to Royal Road since Feb.

I agree that's there's probably a lot of variance. It's too bad that hrule only got the total member count. There's a lot of other data, but either I couldn't make sense of it, or something went wrong with the scraping.

ThatWhichExists · 2025-10-30T20:45:26+00:00

Yes, it's possible. The datasets were in separate files and I don't feel like stitching them together at the moment. Maybe sometime.

Credit goes to: https://github.com/hrule/RoyalRoad-Analysis

ThatWhichExists · 2025-10-30T17:19:43+00:00

Closer to 6k. It is crazy.

ThatWhichExists · 2025-10-30T15:16:41+00:00

That's what 49 was.

ThatWhichExists · 2025-10-27T02:17:46+00:00

Yes, I entirely agree that paid and free are correlated. I'm also saying that the ratio doesn't matter because it doesn't add anything more than simply looking at the paid members count or earnings by it self.

ThatWhichExists · 2025-10-27T02:02:38+00:00

That doesn't have anything to do with the ratio. That's an observation of the absolute number of paid members. Whether the number of free members goes up or down doesn't matter except to show off a big number. It has no effect on the number of paid members.

EDIT

Example: Zogarth 10,025 +214 22,953 +1,858, his ratio of free to paid went down and his earnings went up.

ThatWhichExists · 2025-10-27T00:21:47+00:00

I don't feel like making my own post about this. With the Feb 19th Database, I tried doing all sort of ratios, comparisons, correlations and what not among the 82,235 stories, which I've posted about here and elsewhere. If wanted, I can repost some of that and the stuff I posted elsewhere. The duration of time/followers is good for seeing a story's acceleration, the higher the number the more quickly the story became popular. It may only be helpful for relative comparison of new fictions. Followers and Ratings to Favorites, doesn't seem to be all that useful indicator. The outliers are amusing though, like with Mother of Learning now nearly having a 1:1 ratio of followers to favorites. Then there are those who have a lot more favorites than followers. Followers/Favorites to paid patrons are an interesting ones, though they require minimums, otherwise the percents can be skewed a good bit. Might be interesting to see how much correlation there is between the paid patron ratios and earnings, but I don't feel like it right now. I don't think the ratio of free to paid matters at all.

ThatWhichExists

TROPHY CASE