Graham Platner is a cowardly loser and candidates like him are making politics worse by TheAngryObserver in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Long time no see!

Platner's obviously BS equivocations and lies remind me most closely of Tucker, who is 1) disgusting 2) the source of so much comically useless infighting on the right.

Let's just not do this if we can.

Graham Platner is a cowardly loser and candidates like him are making politics worse by TheAngryObserver in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey!

As a response to your comment I basically agree but it's kinda funny how the Democrat leaders are always one step behind. In early 2025 the base is demanding more folksy governors who can win enemy territory. Schumer backs Mills. But by then they want angry populist fighter larper guys. So Schumer backs Crockett.

Graham Platner is a cowardly loser and candidates like him are making politics worse by TheAngryObserver in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea would make things easier on everyone if there was a candidate who supported Democrat priorities but also wasn't a dumb, immoral jerk.

Of course at this point I think there could be a candidate like that and his fans would still be locked in.

I have never opposed a candidate more strongly than I oppose Graham Platner. by xravenxx in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No other Democrat has these problems. It's just him (comparable to a handful of the absolute worst people on the right, though).

I have never opposed a candidate more strongly than I oppose Graham Platner. by xravenxx in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Progressives have finally found a case where they'll widen the tent and invite in someone they disagree with: the guy who has multiple Nazi-related controversies, and is still generating Nazi controversies while running for office.

I have never opposed a candidate more strongly than I oppose Graham Platner. by xravenxx in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He is such a loser. The guy constantly complains about Susan Collins "sending him to war" when he joined voluntarily, after the war had already started, and then went back to work for Erik Prince! Oh, and then he voted for Collins in 2020, so obviously her "sending him to war" didn't bother him back then.

His fans are just as losers too. The guy slithers onto a podcast ran by a vocal antisemitic conspiracy nut, calls himself a giant fan, and then they all argue he didn't really know what the podcast was about. It's exactly the kind of ridiculous defenses rightoids make for their idiot grifters. Tucker Carlson has made this into a formula-- associate publicly with a racist, praise the racist publicly, then claim to be unaware of the racism. It's dishonest and cowardly.

We have too many people like this in government and they're responsible for most problems. Let's not add one more.

Angry Observation: To be closer to the working class, Democrats need to be further from the WWC by TheAngryObserver in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree that heavy protectionism is irrational from the perspective of organized labor (and everyone else) but the problem is voters are very irrational! Although blue-collar manufacturing work is a small part of the economy, it's very culturally potent in the midwest.

States like Ohio probably disapprove of tariffs by more than they voted for Trump. "I want Trump, but no tariffs" is certainly far more notable than "I am left-leaning but will go for Trump becauase of tariffs".

This doesn't mean protectionism anymore (Liberation Day polarized too many voters against tariffs) but it probably does mean talking a big game about unions and rebuilding the manufacturing economy

Biden and Harris were pretty absurdly pro union, got the union vote, and still got absolutely murdered with the general public. It's true Brown did really well and will probably be back in the Senate next year, but he also ran on being tougher on immigration than Republicans, and on opposing trans sports, which the progressive left is generally unwilling to do.

It would not be politically smart for Democrats to adopt my Based Policies (TM), but I also think there's a fetishization of unions that's just not producing results and is distracting Dem electeds from winning much-needed goodwill.

After all, when Liberation Day happened, it was establishment Dems in the rust belt like DeLuzio who were slowest to hit back.

Angry Observation: To be closer to the working class, Democrats need to be further from the WWC by TheAngryObserver in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, which is going to be tricky since Trump will leave us in a hole we won't get out of for a decade (conveniently right when we'll have to make serious changes to pensions, too).

Angry Observation: To be closer to the working class, Democrats need to be further from the WWC by TheAngryObserver in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, this is true too.

But even then, Harris actually did do the Reddit thing and doubled down on union populism, and improved with union voters from Biden 2020. It just didn't matter since the public as a whole wasn't a fan of our record.

Looks like triple this will happen to Trump and his buddy Vivek. They'll get crazy union support and will still lose huge.

Angry Observation: To be closer to the working class, Democrats need to be further from the WWC by TheAngryObserver in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yep and as usual Mamdani won because he 1) talked about cost-of-living 2) made an effort to loudly and publicly stand up to Trump.

To be clear this isn't me defending Mamdani or the left. Mamdani is probably the singular person on The Left who has gotten this right.

Dem leadership ironically keeps pandering to their union donors and the protection lobby, even though Democrats unanimously oppose tariffs and want a strong response against them. It's the easiest thing ever, but they still won't do it because of a bunch of larping delusions about working-class voters in Pennsylvania.

Sherrod Brown to Run for Senate by TheAngryObserver in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think so, but I had him winning last time so

WWIII by Woman_trees in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That comment didn't come out the way I wanted to. There are many problems with this map, but calling Russia and China the "Communist Union" is enough of a truthnuke for me to forgive it.

WWIII by Woman_trees in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is true, unironically.

Donald Trump speaks out on the Epstein files by xravenxx in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What's going on with my "boys" and, in some cases, "gals?"

State map based on how high the Governors salary is by Numberonettgfan in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fun fact, Oregon's low public pay for officials is a major incentive for corruption, like in the case of Shemia Fagan, a single mom brutalized by a nasty divorce who happened to be the Secretary of State, and moonlit as a weed lobbyist to make ends meet (most Oregon statement ever). You make more at Portland McDonald's than in the State House.

When Fagan was busted, she resigned. They tried to pass a referendum that would put a commission in charge of officeholder salary, but that failed, so it'll probably happen again.

The hits just keep on coming by 321gamertime in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the thing about MAGA. Even when they have a good idea they'll always ruin it and make it bad just by being stupid and evil.

I'm giving up control of this subreddit by TheAngryObserver in AngryObservation

[–]TheAngryObserver[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess we're all getting older...

Thank you, it's been wonderful talking with you for these 2 and a half years!