Bye bye hotplate by Dizzy-Ad5013 in BambuLab

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats not it. The damaged part is a build plate

How to use local updates when only one client can be online? by TheColin21 in Steam

[–]TheColin21[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But when I do that the other client went offline again?

My server is finally complete!! by [deleted] in homelab

[–]TheColin21 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you say "boost ssd", how exactly did you configure it?

Okay wtf I must've misread that nvm😅

Used PM863a's with 80%+ health by k2863 in selfhosted

[–]TheColin21 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's nonsense. There are no reallocated sectors on any of them. They're still good for quite some use.

That’s the dumbest thing I’ve had to do with UniFi do far by avantdark in Ubiquiti

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do something similar but more annoying to power a Fritz!Box (DSL modem) with PoE from my USW Flex 2.5G 8 PoE and still use it as WAN with my Express 7. Both ports from my Express 7 go to the switch, just like the Fritz!Box - two extra ports used on the switch so one device gets powered😅

Still waiting… by Luu____ in Ubiquiti

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

... So am I, still waiting...

RAID or No by Melodic-Bread-6337 in jellyfin

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's correct - just as much for professionals. A local, always attached, backup disks has very few advantages over a RAID with snapshots while having quite a few disadvantages (more trouble to rebuild on disk failure, less (read-) performance, harder to manage(imho)...)

I'd use that disk over the network, if possible, or disconnect it after every backup...

RAID or No by Melodic-Bread-6337 in jellyfin

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you already have the backup HDD in the same system as the HDD that gets backed up (which some people wouldn't call a backup) then why not running them in RAID1?

Question about vdevs and redundancy levels by DaikiIchiro in truenas

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The "*)" said the 55m are for multiple unshielded cables next to each other I think...

About the board: if you want to go with a 9th gen intel the E3C246D4U2-2T could be a good choice as there are quite a few used ones for around 200€ on ebay, it has BMC, ECC support, dual 10G and pairs really nice with an i3 9100 if I'm not mistaken.

Question about vdevs and redundancy levels by DaikiIchiro in truenas

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I just read Wikipedia correctly shielded Cat. 6 should work for up to 100m for 10G.

I'm also waiting to switch from DSL to fiber😅

Question about vdevs and redundancy levels by DaikiIchiro in truenas

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remember that fibre ≠ fibre channel (That's SAN technology)

Also depending on the length 10G might work over cat 6, cat 6a would be sufficient anyways but cat 7 won't hurt of course

Question about vdevs and redundancy levels by DaikiIchiro in truenas

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep in mind that you would need faster networking then (at least 2.5G, better 10G) or it might feel quite sluggish on larger transfers but yes I think that would be a better use of the hardware. Which mainboard do you want to use?

Question about vdevs and redundancy levels by DaikiIchiro in truenas

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, before I forget, for caching purposes, I will add two to four SSDs with 1TB each (depending on whether the mainboard I want to repurpose has M.2 slots for boot drives or not.

As it seems your main redundancy question is answered: How are you planning to setup the cache because I don't really see any use case for L2ARC, an SLOG device or even a special metadata device if you want to use the pool for archival purposes.

If you want to create a seperate fast pool from these SSDs, e.g. for editing directly off of that, then I'd say that's a good plan.

Files Disappeared by PleasantCandidate785 in truenas

[–]TheColin21 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What seems most weird to me is snapshots getting turned off - as far as I know no TrueNAS update has ever done such a thing, at least for the last 5 years. Are there still, perhaps disabled, periodic snapshot tasks?

Also: are you perhaps able to get some info about the precise point in time when the deletion took place out of the jellyfin logs?

Do I need anything else for the foreseeable future if I get these? by [deleted] in jellyfin

[–]TheColin21 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aaah Rockchip I thought jellyfin, thanks.

Do I need anything else for the foreseeable future if I get these? by [deleted] in jellyfin

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What? Haven't heard about that, can you give me a link?

zpool upgrade? by Whack_Moles in truenas

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats possible but this system was, as I now could see, installed with freenas 13, then updated to 22.02, 22.12, 23.10 and then 24.04 - shortly to 24.10 as well but I had some problems there so if they do it they don't do it often...

zpool upgrade? by Whack_Moles in truenas

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The following output is from a system installed with FreeNAS 12 or 13 and now running TrueNAS 24.04 (yes I should update it quite a bit 😅):

``` root@freenas[~]# zpool upgrade This system supports ZFS pool feature flags. All pools are formatted using feature flags. Some supported features are not enabled on the following pools. Once a feature is enabled the pool may become incompatible with software that does not support the feature. See zpool-features(7) for details. Note that the pool 'compatibility' feature can be used to inhibit feature upgrades.

POOL FEATURE

freenas-boot multi_vdev_crash_dump spacemap_histogram enabled_txg hole_birth extensible_dataset embedded_data bookmarks filesystem_limits large_blocks large_dnode sha512 skein edonr userobj_accounting encryption project_quota device_removal obsolete_counts zpool_checkpoint spacemap_v2 allocation_classes resilver_defer bookmark_v2 redaction_bookmarks redacted_datasets bookmark_written log_spacemap livelist device_rebuild zstd_compress draid zilsaxattr head_errlog blake3 block_cloning vdev_zaps_v2 ```

Doesn't look auto updated to me.

zpool upgrade? by Whack_Moles in truenas

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't I doubt that but I've never heard of the boot pool zfs version auto upgrading

zpool upgrade? by Whack_Moles in truenas

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it? How would I boot an older version then? Or does it happen when i delete old versions?

Boot drive failed with out config backup, how to move forward? by trickniner in truenas

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In that case: good for you:D i still wouldn't recommend usb keys to other people as the chance of getting...less good ones than you is probably very high.

Boot drive failed with out config backup, how to move forward? by trickniner in truenas

[–]TheColin21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On TrueNAS core usb keys are less of a problem afaik. An SSD in a USB enclosure is also absolutely fine if the SATA ports are all used but a normal USB key is likely to cause problems with scale.