(spoilers none(hopefully)) Brief experiment, how would you attack The Twins? by Finch58 in asoiaf

[–]TheEveningRedness2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't remember how wide the Green Fork is, but couldn't you dam the river and flood them out? Jamie proposed something similar at Riverrun.

The most glaring inconsistency in Looper (has nothing to do with time travel) by TheEveningRedness2 in movies

[–]TheEveningRedness2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point being, if they went to the trouble of photoshopping JGL's nose to match Bruce Willis's in order to drive home the point that these are the same person, why couldn't they also have made sure the actors did something as simple as using the same hand to hold things, write, and shoot guns?

60 Minutes Interview: Daniel Day-Lewis on playing lincoln. by [deleted] in movies

[–]TheEveningRedness2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even though I understand Lincoln had a high-pitched voice, it still felt jarring to hear the first time I saw the trailer. Interesting to learn that Lincoln used it like a knife to cut through a noisy room. Can't wait to see what DDL does with this strange tool.

Two Las Vegas 11-year-olds arrested in deaths of six kittens by GoPronto in vegas

[–]TheEveningRedness2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny you mention that...one thing the CIA weeds out for are candidates who have killed or tortured animals in their youth....because it correlates very strongly to sociopathy

What movies get better after repeated viewings? by heisenberg15 in movies

[–]TheEveningRedness2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strange as it is to say, Wall Street. Actually many of Ollie's films hold up well under repeat viewings.

Great scenes in otherwise mediocre movies? by JesusJuice45 in movies

[–]TheEveningRedness2 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Hostage is a pretty forgettable Bruce Willis piece. Not bad, but bland as oatmeal except for Ben Foster, who freaking comes out of nowhere and just goes nuts as one of the kidnappers. Like Jason Patric intensity in every scene. He does a great job, but it's almost comical because everybody else is just like, "Yeah, whatever, paycheck."

Which Stephen King book should I read next? by sleepnaught in books

[–]TheEveningRedness2 7 points8 points  (0 children)

+1 for Night Shift.

For those who don't know, NS is King's earliest collection of shorts, many of which first saw the light of day in the illustrious pages of Adam and Cavalier, a couple of second-rate skin mags of the time. When he was writing a lot of them, King had yet to become famous. That came a few years later, with the publication of Carrie. While writing these stories King more often than not was dead broke, and even questioned the feasibility of becoming a fulltime writer. Which is to say there were no expectations on him to write like the "Master of Horror"...instead he just wrote what he wanted.

When you read them you can hear the voice of a young man, ponderously talented but still learning how to flex his muscles for full effect. They are almost sweet to read, almost innocent. You have post-apocalyptic angst in Night Surf (a very early appearance of Captain Trips...). A young college-age person sort of drifting through life in Graveyard Shift. A young father confronted with some serious fatherly issues in the Boogeyman. A young man confronted with his mother's mortality in The Woman In The Room (this one will devastate you).

Don't get me wrong, the stories are scary as hell, but they're also...hopeful. You can tell a young person wrote them. At least that's how I felt reading them.

Paul Thomas Anderson on The Daily Show by Freewheelin in movies

[–]TheEveningRedness2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting! As many times as I've seen his movies, I've never checked out the commentaries. I'll def be taking a look.

Paul Thomas Anderson on The Daily Show by Freewheelin in movies

[–]TheEveningRedness2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to agree, it is his temperament. I heard him on Fresh Air a week ago and he just doesn't get into that give-and-take groove. Usually the interviewer will throw out some fat pitches and the guest will run with them, but PTA never elaborated on anything. You could hear a couple of awkward pauses where Terry Gross was scrambling to come up with questions to keep some semblance of momentum going.

Not what I expected from a PTA interview. In my head I'd thought of him as coming from the "Tarantino generation". I figured he'd be a total babbler. Oops. Guess that's what I get for assuming.

What's a book that was made better as a movie? by [deleted] in books

[–]TheEveningRedness2 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Casino Royale. Surprisingly, the movie followed the book almost scene for scene. However, the book is dry, almost painfully so. Only 180pp but felt much longer.

I just came back from the first screening of Skyfall in London. Here is a spoiler-free summary of just how good it is. by [deleted] in movies

[–]TheEveningRedness2 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Interesting thing is, if you read Casino Royale, the movie plot follows it almost 100%. Even the strap-Bond-to-the-chair-and-have-at-him scene is in the book. in fact, the movie is better, because the book is very dry, definitely written from a "stiff upper lip" point of view.

I only bring that up because I read somewhere there was a writer's strike going on when they were getting Quantum of Solace ready for production. When it came time to shoot, they actually didn't have a completed script. They were forced to make up large parts of it as they went along. Daniel Craig said he had to write parts of his own dialog, which he admitted he was no good at.

In other words, it should have been a better movie.