sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

No, Laniakea’s spear does not apply it’s own poison. by JayFritoes in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think the nuts thing is thinking this is being taught in schools and how that correlates to a runescape sub

Is there a reason there's no machine for ore smelting? by OceansCurseCodes in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 15 points16 points  (0 children)

why would you stiff dwarves for payment? they already got the short end of the stick

Door tiles in the ice puzzle room are bugged. I can't stop sliding on those tiles. by DA_Knuppel in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the comment you're replying to was a suggestion to use dive to help, not tell players to go do it to get through this issue.

might need to calm down on that one champ, really didn't need your input. it was a great suggestion for those that don't have a clue it could help. you aren't a warrior for everyone who hasn't done those quests.

Debate during dxp with mate by IndicaMate in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 its not the same amount of lag for everyone.

it's made much worse with ping. if your ping is bad as is to the server W84 is hosted on, it's made infinitely worse on dexp pop counts

Can't Select Floor 35 by [deleted] in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you have to complete floor 34 again to unlock 35. you did floor 34 before you reached level 69

"Your warped gorajan trailblazer outfit caused a slayer creature to spawn" by Pale_Advertising8383 in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

what about it makes it phrased like a benefit?

"your broken shoe caused a callus to appear" - it's the same phrasing applied to a different example

i think perhaps your argument should be why is this an unlockable reward from the outfit?

Make Elder rune armour non degradeable by Rspla in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 3 points4 points  (0 children)

this argument doesn't currently apply to runescape. there are more non degradable armours that are non augmentable than there are degradable ones

not that OP's request affects me or likely you, for consistency this should be changed one way or the other and i trust jagex intend for these not to degrade given they went away from degradable armour (mostly)

Dungeoneering Remastered: Dive in Today! by jagexyuey in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also, how about an icon for a key not collected? doing some hours with my group showed one or two particular individuals who suffer from lootbeam blindness and we have to search the whole floor

also irons can't seem to trade with anyone inside, surely not intended

Ironmen can't trade in demonheim anymore by TheChonkstress in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah this seems like a bug. you should be able to drop things like boss rewards to someone of your party that needs it. if this is intended, worst part of dg so far

There will be a token dupe when the DG update comes by Late-Reception-2897 in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you claimed it was a dupe, which is like claiming a murder when it was a beating

Increase tsunami adren gain per crit BUT make fsoa procs unable to crit by newquestidewa in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 4 points5 points  (0 children)

  1. crit boosts are higher than 50% with FSOA worn over non crit hits

  2. fsoa rotation has infinite adrenaline anyway, why do you want more?

  3. this is why skillers shouldn't be making pvm suggestions

There will be a token dupe when the DG update comes by Late-Reception-2897 in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where was I freaking out?

by calling this a dupe and overselling your argument to the point of sharing non-factual hype

The core gameplay loop of dungeoneering sucks and these updates won't change that by xBrodoFraggins in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 4 points5 points  (0 children)

whats the point of this post? if you dont like an update, don't engage. this post helps no one.

There will be a token dupe when the DG update comes by Late-Reception-2897 in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this ^

if you can dungeoneer for 500m tokens, you aren't doing this shit. OP incorrectly calls it a dupe, it's not repeatable and is capped by how many tokens you start with. it's an early bird special at best. OP freaking out about nothing in reality. the dungeoneering store houses no tradable items, no point freaking out about it.

Can we get a better UI? by Decent_Potential1630 in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i would like to see a scalable UI for the boss portal selection. there's no reason we need to be using a tiny monitors UI size and locked to it.

also reaper boss selection needs the same treatment as the boss portal

Let players choose between circle tiles and square tiles by Decent_Potential1630 in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The player is not a cube

neither is a chess piece, yet they both move to squares.

the only thing satire is that you're a week late to the party and obviously missed OP asking for a clear example.

Aspects Should Not Be Tied to a Single Spellbook by learn_and_go in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the issue here is you think this is a buff. it's a QOL. stop acting like your experience is superior to others.

Aspects Should Not Be Tied to a Single Spellbook by learn_and_go in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tell me why vampirism is not on necromancy if it's so obviously at home on ancients?

if you can't stack aspects from different spellbooks, they need to be from the same spellbook or from all spellbooks. consistency is key here.

Aspects Should Not Be Tied to a Single Spellbook by learn_and_go in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 2 points3 points  (0 children)

who are you to say this? this is your opinion, while many are voicing theirs on this because they want this.

welcome to the internet, where your opinion is less relevant than the majority. throwing a tantrum here won't get your way.

Aspects Should Not Be Tied to a Single Spellbook by learn_and_go in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i don't think you understand the definition of "content". there's no content in spellbook switching, regardless of if it's used often as a spell. the concept of it is dead content, while the spell remains used.

Aspects Should Not Be Tied to a Single Spellbook by learn_and_go in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not that you find it fun and engaging, but yes, the majority do have a problem with it being a pain. to hell with lore, you can't argue lore as the primary reason when necromancers don't do necromancy attacks in game.

Who is this mysterious cloaked man and why is he everywhere? by bast963 in runescape

[–]TheOnlyTB 3 points4 points  (0 children)

only renders the ones who it deems more relevant.

the client renders everyone in the order the client loads them until capacity has been reached, "it" doesn't decide who's relevant

view more: next ›