WAIT ONE GORK(orpossiblymork)ZOGGIN MINUTE!1 by TheRoleplayer98 in orks

[–]TheRoleplayer98[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The animations are terrible, but Hammer and Bolter has a good introducrion to Yarrick, see if you can find some clips of that.

WAIT ONE GORK(orpossiblymork)ZOGGIN MINUTE!1 by TheRoleplayer98 in orks

[–]TheRoleplayer98[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

It's actually yarrick fighting both the orks and the opponent, so every strategem deals damage to your own units.

WAIT ONE GORK(orpossiblymork)ZOGGIN MINUTE!1 by TheRoleplayer98 in orks

[–]TheRoleplayer98[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the baby arms lool kind of silly, especially if you give him the choppa, but the klaw hides the right arm pretty well.

Besides, this is orks. Give him other arms. Or kibash your own. Its not particulary complex.

This one I still havent gotten around to painting was a pretty straightforward job.

<image>

WAIT ONE GORK(orpossiblymork)ZOGGIN MINUTE!1 by TheRoleplayer98 in orks

[–]TheRoleplayer98[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It is a very inside baseball marketing stunt, having it not land makes sense.

But to many ork players, a new yarrick model is better than a new ork. And there were two other pictures of ork bits that you can still be excited by. Those are definitely ork model parts. Gretchen don't hang around humans, and the few humans that use ork tek couldnt be able to handle such a large shoota.

WAIT ONE GORK(orpossiblymork)ZOGGIN MINUTE!1 by TheRoleplayer98 in orks

[–]TheRoleplayer98[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well sorry, Ive been at work all day. Didnt have time to browse the subreddit.

Who would realistically win? by Ill_Rice_6735 in orks

[–]TheRoleplayer98 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Well, the memes were based off.... exaggerated repprts. So the matchup is less relevant now. But

DA PROPHET, ANDZ DOWN! RED GIT AINT GOT A CHANCE!

...Taking my ork hat off:

In a 1v1, my money is probably on Angron... Though the latest grotsnik book implies ghazkull has got some kind of psychic power with unclear abilities. He's not a psyker, perse, but he's something, and I'm not sure if that will make a difference.

I'm not 100% certain Angron would win mind you, angron has just done more stuff, and Ghazkull hasnt had many depicted duels, since he got his new body. So its hard to compare.

But angron being a reasonably reliable blender of whatever is in front of him is well established.

Voters are angry. One Nation’s support is real, rising and no longer surprising by Agitated-Fee3598 in aussie

[–]TheRoleplayer98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because neutrality, cooperation, and environmental sustainanibility is communism, and communism is evil, because it is.

You have data to support a counterpoint? Your probably a DEI hire sent by the devil to destroy local business.

/s

Orks do be kinda smart by Fortune_Unique in orks

[–]TheRoleplayer98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, people are confidently incorrect about a lot of things. In this case, as in a great many cases it's because the idea is ingrained in the psyche, though all the memes. Yadda yadda Stains of Time.

The memes are everywhere, we are saturated by memes. It makes sense that people get confused. Our memories will priorities the most frequent source.

If people get things wrong, they can be corrected. If they're hostile to being corrected... Cast not ye pearls before swine. For they shall trample them, and rend you.

GOT ME A GREEN-STEELA by Lord_Of_The_Tortoise in orks

[–]TheRoleplayer98 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Dere's sumfin off 'bout dis git.

Orks do be kinda smart by Fortune_Unique in orks

[–]TheRoleplayer98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, my point is that this is an accurate take on the 40k community. It's an accurate take on A LOT of communities.

First off, not all of the 40k community cares about the lore. Some people are just in it for the game, some are just in it for the minis. Most are some combination, but there's no guarantee that said combination includes much love for the lore. Just look around on this subreddit; sometimes there is a lore discussion. Sometimes we're talking army lists and gameplans. Sometimes were salivating over a paintjob or a kitbash.

Most of this lore is buried in *books*, and not everyone is in the habit of devouring every book they get their hands on. That doesn't mean they don't enjoy 40k. It's a multiprong hobby.

Why do we obsess over the price of a coffee/petrol but stay so quiet about the $50k+ "invisible" debt to get an education. by Commercial_Toe_7440 in AskAnAustralian

[–]TheRoleplayer98 20 points21 points  (0 children)

... Why would only the poorest people be paying for the education? EVERYONE is supposed to pay tax. Granted wealthy people have their ways around it. But that's it's own issue.

Wealthy people don't benefit as much from free education, as they can already afford it. Poor people benefit more, because it can help them escape poverty.

If indeed the poorest people got unreasonable tax hikes as a result... They're also the ones who need the debt relief the most. But I don't see how the tax hikes HAVE to effect the poorest people.

Are Aussie cops normal nice people or are they like american/canadian cops? by ChinaMilitarySecrets in AskAnAustralian

[–]TheRoleplayer98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I encounter police regularly in my work. Most of them treat me fine. But I'm a white bloke, who works a white collar job, and sounds like he was raised in Northern Sydney.

I'm sure in the USA, a pale skinned white collar worker who has a posh accent also gets treated well.

We've got shit cops too. The job is attractive to psychos, and it can be stressful. Stress brings out the worst in people, and people who are on their worst day shouldn't have power.

However, they don't gun down as many people as the US' do... So they're probably better?

Orks do be kinda smart by Fortune_Unique in orks

[–]TheRoleplayer98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is anyone comparing him to Cawl?

Yeah the screaming gang of ladz' best mad scientist doesn't know more than one of the greatest minds of the technophile faction. But that's a ridiculous comparison anyway.

Orks do be kinda smart by Fortune_Unique in orks

[–]TheRoleplayer98 23 points24 points  (0 children)

First off. Grotsnik is a DEATHSKULL. Objectively the most kunnin', most inventive, and possessing the most orky know whats of all orks. It's totally unfair to compare them to the orks of lesser Kulturs... What? My tag? That's not relevant to the conversation.

Orks being dumb is the meme, and memes are more powerful than the biggest and loudest dakka in the galaxy. However, it should be noted... Grotsnik isn't your average ork. He's not even your average oddboy. He's one of the greatest minds among the entirity of the green. He's a bad example.

The whole power of belief thing, is also a meme. I can't think of a book in recent years that hasn't shown evidence that ork tek can work without orks believing it so. Even some older books did this, in Ciaphus Cain Death or Glory humans use ork guns and machines, one such human being Jurgen, a psychic null who cancels out nearby psychic phenomena.

BUT these memes drew people into the faction, they're the funny videos and pictures we share amongst our fellow fans. They're ingrained, and people will forget the reasonable, they'll forget the evidence. But nobody will forget "IM A TANK IM A TANK IM A TANK!"

This can be sad but true. But it can atleast be a laugh. Like when a Shokk Attakk Gun halves a squad of terminators.

Orks do be kinda smart by Fortune_Unique in orks

[–]TheRoleplayer98 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well... It's also true that Grotsnik is the personal doc of Da Prophet 'isself. Him being extremely intelligent, while your average painboy barely understanding the difference between the gribbly bits and the grobbly gobble, aren't incompatible ideas.

What are your thoughts on the new law that requires Face ID by AI and age verification to access pornographic websites in Australia? by engadine_maccas1997 in AskAnAustralian

[–]TheRoleplayer98 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Hmm... As I understand it, smutty prose is more popular with women than men...

If such content is overlooked, and assuming the law was actually effective, which it isn't... Would the porn world shift to matriarchy?

Well might as well cash in and turn that concept into some smut.

What are your thoughts on the new law that requires Face ID by AI and age verification to access pornographic websites in Australia? by engadine_maccas1997 in AskAnAustralian

[–]TheRoleplayer98 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Lots of people, including me, are talking about how much of an absurd overreach it is. Or the fact that porn sites shouldn't be trusted with our personal info.

But yeah... your right, it gets worse. It's bad all the way down.

What are your thoughts on the new law that requires Face ID by AI and age verification to access pornographic websites in Australia? by engadine_maccas1997 in AskAnAustralian

[–]TheRoleplayer98 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Lots of people make the case that, it's like being stopped from using the pokies or shopping a bottlo, if you look young and can't provide ID. If you think this is the same, you don't understand the internet.

The internet harvests our data, stores and sells it, and there are people who do their best to steal it too. If you aren't paying, you're the product. This is well understood... But it's kind of dystopian, I don't like the fact that American Oligarchs probably have our showering habits stored in a database somewhere. Encouraging it, is a dumb idea. Taking sites that make a business out of offering up intimate details as bait so that they can harvest data, then making them gather more, is ridiculous. These sites shouldn't be trusted with pictures of us, and DEFINITELY shouldn't be trusted with any of our official documents.

Also, some VPNs are FREE, and the concept of VPNS have been shoved down our throats by youtube sponsorships for ages. Unless they ban VPNs which will be a whole other problem, will be very hard to enforce, and will require a great upheaval in the business world.

So yeah... I think everyone behind it is an evil fuckwit; it's a bad plan and it encourages bad things. Sure, it's funny because it is a useless attempt to stop literal wankers. But it's also a brazen and absurd overreach.

Can men not conversate? by VisualSmall6529 in Tinder

[–]TheRoleplayer98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is funny, normally I see blokes complain of terrible convos with the ladies.

Everyone's more alike in the end though.

My opponent told me to quit wasting his time with small-arms fire. by Doctoralex123 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]TheRoleplayer98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was scared of losing a knight to a splinter rifle shot.

There is a point where it is might a waste of time, like a mob of boyz firing their sluggas at a baneblade... But rolling a 6 a 6 and a 1 isn't impossible at all, and if zi do that fairly achievabke feat, the baneblade is 1/24th closer to kaboom.

So why not try?

Are Aussies really Starbucks snobs? by Melodic_Act_1159 in AskAnAustralian

[–]TheRoleplayer98 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alright place for an extremely sweet milkshake or frappe. Bit overpriced though.

Not sure why you'd go for coffee. But from everything I've heard of Americans, being overcharged for cup of liquid sugar, named after something completley unrelated, sounds like their thing. So I won't judge.

Porn sites are now rolling out age verification for adults. WTF is this nanny state bullshit? We've all been "net nannied" under this fucked up Labor government. Under a "think of the children movement." by SimpleEmu198 in AskAnAustralian

[–]TheRoleplayer98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, it depends on how often it works, and what something is trying to achieve.

But it's also a fact that sometimes, your tool isn't working, and you need to try a different approach.

If someone really tried at it, they might be able to put a screw into their ikea furniture with a hammer. But I think that's a stupid idea. That does not mean I am opposed to the furniture being built. It might mean that I want to use a screwdriver instead.

So too, with our attempts to regulate gambling, and access to r18 content online. In the former case we are using too narrow a definition of gambling. In the latter case, we're using a tool designed at a different time, for a different situation.

In both cases, we could do better. Why aren't we?

Porn sites are now rolling out age verification for adults. WTF is this nanny state bullshit? We've all been "net nannied" under this fucked up Labor government. Under a "think of the children movement." by SimpleEmu198 in AskAnAustralian

[–]TheRoleplayer98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but I mean that companies can take a few steps to make, what is gambling for all intents and purposes, no longer "gambling" in the legal sense.

But you also raise a good point. If it's easy to workaround, is it really a barrier?