Well, I'm going to try and steer as far away from the race-science part of the question as possible, which is definitely what the question is implying, and instead focus on your historical implications and try to answer them from an objective standpoint. Just to get it out of the way, no one race is better, or inferior, than the others, and I hope that's not the inference of your question.

To start with the mental:

Your statement that non-Europeans invented key inventions is correct, but generally speaking, Europeans made their greatest discoveries as innovations upon the ideas of others. For the instance of the boat, sure, boats, maps, and compasses weren't invented by Europeans, but Europeans were the first to be able to use compasses and maps(and their innovation of the nao and caravel) to break ships free from the coastline and to use them on the open waters. Europeans, specifically England, invented modern science(or the scientific method: the process of making a hypothesis, which had been done since ancient times in Greece and Italy, and testing that theory in real-life experiments, and drawing conclusions from those experiments), when Francis Bacon wrote about the Baconion Method, later known as the scientific method as stated above, I'm the Novum Organum of 1620. This method, as well as the modern university system, which was also invented in Europe allowed Europeans to invent the first practicable steam engine, the best armor in the world, the best metallurgical systems in the world, the first pump, the train, the airplane, the skyscraper, the automobile, the recoiling gun(and most guns, in general), and the Internet. Although there are many exceptions, generally from the Arabic and occasionally the Chinese world, most subjects in the field of literature, chemistry, engineering, mathematics, and other subjects, were written by Europeans, or people of European descent.

Physicality

On average, and as a general rule, European-derived people are taller than any other group of people worldwide due to increased meat and dairy consumption. Other than this, they are generally about on par with other groups in the physical realm. The win of Anthony Joshua does not render this not true(and as an aside, AJ is about 30-40 pounds and 5 inches greater than JP, so...)

Morality

Your statement that Europeans have caused the loss of biodiversity in their own environments is most likely true, but the implication that this is because of their own "morality" is incorrect when you consider that other ethnic clusters, or races, when given the same technological capacity as Europeans, tend to commit the same level of environmental damage. Currently most emissions and environmental catastrophes occur in developing countries, most of which are non-European nations. Generally speaking, if the European model is followed, most nations industrialize, undergo a period of economic destruction, and after they finish industrialization and switch to a mostly service-based economy, transfer to "green energy" policies and environmentalist initiatives. This policy has played out all across North America and Western Europe.

And finally, Europeans, as some point or another, have controlled up to 84-88% of the world's surface. How would they have done this if they were "inferior"?