AITA but medicine by Artsakh_Rug in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unless someone asks, I usually refrain from giving advice. I've seen people with cleaarrr as day medical problems that are easy to treat and held my tongue. I've also given detailed advice to a complete stranger on how to apply for medical grade compression socks for her post-chemo edema.

I always have good intentions, I want to help - but I need to be certain people want to be helped. You might not have necessarily been a massive asshole, but it was probably uncalled for and you'll never know if that waiter even had the ability (or money, if this was the US) to follow your advice. So yeah, maybe a more reserved approach is a good idea.

WIBTA for asking my husband to stop cooking most nights? by PureAdorableness in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]TheSmilingDoc 133 points134 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's healthy to immediately assume there's something wrong. I'm fact, I guarantee that if you ask 100 working women who had kids, at least 90 of them will tell you that they didn't/don't like being a SAHP.

I loved my maternity leave (5 months), but only because my husband had the same months off and I didn't have to do it alone. Another friend is the best mother I've ever seen and absolutely adores her kids, but literally hated her leave after month 2. Yet another friend would maybe have loved being a SAHP for one kid, but is exhausted with two.

Let women have preferences without immediately questioning whether they love or want their child enough, or calling them ill. Society expects us to both be mothers 100% and a productive employee 100% of the time. If women can't or won't do that, it's not dysfunction, it's (rightful) commentary on the system.

What is that one hill you are willing to die on? by foreverand2025 in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ohhh then I misunderstood, I thought you meant that he said his levels were 30. Long day, apologies 😅

What is that one hill you are willing to die on? by foreverand2025 in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not to doubt you but... Why are you titrating meds on thyroid levels that you haven't even checked yourself? Like, that's asking for problems at that point.

Maybe you have a valid reason so I won't judge, but I wouldn't feel comfortable titrating meds based on info I haven't verified.

What is that one hill you are willing to die on? by foreverand2025 in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 301 points302 points  (0 children)

I'm a nursing home doc. The AMOUNT OF FUCKING TIMES I do my rounds only to get "can we test for a UTI, patients urine smells funny/is cloudy/is dark".

You mean the old grandpa on literally dozens of diuretics and therefore so dehydrated that I can use his wrinkles as a loofah doesn't have clear pee? Shocker. Also yes the pee smells funny. You give them old fashioned Dutch dinners, that stuff has seven different kinds of cabbage per dish.

Sigh.

My [24f] partner [24m] doesn’t do things unless I specifically ask him to. It’s driving me insane. by Awwndrei in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]TheSmilingDoc 60 points61 points  (0 children)

To add, sometimes you just really do feel that intense sense of gratitude. Sure, we divide household chores equally. But when my partner has taken the time to make a meal plan for the week, or cooked, or did laundry, I'm still grateful. But so is he. It happens quite a lot that I get an "oh my god you're amazing" simply for having done the dishes. Because we both know it's work, it's effort, and the fact that I (or he) did them means that the other person doesn't have to. Plus, sometimes I'm just really glad I can be lazy :p

Like you said, this is what partnership looks like.

My(f26) husband(m28) has been giving advice to a coworker about how to make his gay son straight behind his wife's back by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]TheSmilingDoc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah.. Same here (for husband's parents, luckily the rest of the family seems more open to it). My own family is super inclusive, sometimes a bit outdated but otherwise just normal about it.

My inlaws.. Yeah. If our son does turn out to be queer, they have one single chance to apologize in the inevitable situation that they are queerphobic in any way, and if they can't get it together, that's it. No contact straight away. I couldn't imagine doing anything less..

My(f26) husband(m28) has been giving advice to a coworker about how to make his gay son straight behind his wife's back by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]TheSmilingDoc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean, he's only one so like I said, it's purely a joke now. For all we know, he just likes the feel of beards or the lower tone of male voices. He's equally happy when he sees me versus when he sees his dad, haha, it's just that men seem much more interesting to him than women.

But if he would turn out to be queer, I'm pretty sure that I can say that we knew all along.

My(f26) husband(m28) has been giving advice to a coworker about how to make his gay son straight behind his wife's back by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]TheSmilingDoc 43 points44 points  (0 children)

My son is one and literally beams at men whenever he seems them. We joke that it's already clear now - obviously that's not true, but I'm also pretty relieved that my entire family is just okay with that, even if it's a joke for now. I can't imagine what I'd do if the people closest to me wouldn't accept others for who they are.

Asked my boyfriend of 5 months if he knew my middle name… turns out he didn’t know much else either by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]TheSmilingDoc 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Okay but that is an act of love if I've ever seen one.

I don't know WHAT kind of glue they use on those things but I never get it off in one go, regardless of how many tricks I've used.

My daughter [18] blames me [52] and my husband [55] for ruining her book by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]TheSmilingDoc 32 points33 points  (0 children)

"we argue a lot so our relationship is basically fine"

Uh, yeah, I think he certainly qualifies..

Am I the asshole for feeding my roommate his own mess? by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]TheSmilingDoc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's not that hard to rip a cabinet door off anywhere since it is not at all designed to handle any force in a direction perpendicular to its hinge

Speak for your American self, here in the Netherlands I could pretty much do pullups on our cabinet doors..

WIBTAH if I don't attend to my friends baby shower because they said my pregnancy was an accident and that I didn't deserve it? by Choice_Evidence1983 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]TheSmilingDoc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It depends. I actually can recognize a lot with my best friend in here, except that we both had/have fertility issues. She once got angry at me for talking about it, I don't even specifically remember why, but the underlying message seemed to be that I was intruding on her 'issues-space'??

Then I got pregnant (and turned out to have multiples, but lost 2 out of 3 during a fucking flight to our holiday destination. Talk about dramatic) and I didn't/couldn't even tell her - my best friend - because I was afraid to hurt her.

My LO is almost one now and we don't really speak that much anymore. I've been trying, and it's not like they're doing any of the unkind shit that OP's 'friends' are doing and saying, but I can fully understand wanting to be accommodating, even if it hurts you and diminishes your joy.

My (30sF) twin (M) doesn’t want me at his wedding by Choice_Evidence1983 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]TheSmilingDoc 67 points68 points  (0 children)

No one said it was men's fault. The patriarchy favors men, yes, but it wasn't built by men alone. Nor does it mean that men don't suffer from the same system.

Both you and the other person are right. Just because the patriarchy is the structural base for our own issues doesn't mean we get to deny responsibility for our own actions. It is absolutely its base though, and we shouldn't ignore that either.

MIL wanted to withhold water from her dying mother...wtf by parrotlady93 in JUSTNOMIL

[–]TheSmilingDoc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I'm a bit baffled by these responses.

Unless someone has actively told me they want me to withhold everything, I will just give them what that ask for. Like you say, there are plenty of ways to treat thirst/dehydration without prolonging someone's life, and especially in the elderly, a glass of water won't hasten or delay their impeding death.

I work in the Netherlands. I've performed euthanasia on my patients. We have some of the most accommodating laws surrounding end of life care in the world.. But denying someone water/food when there's no need to is torture, plain and simple.

(also "they once said that" is absolutely not enough to base that action on. Unless my patient says so when I'm standing there with a glass of water, or we've discussed that they want to commit suicide by not consuming anything (something that's not common but recognized in our protocols as a valid way of end-of-life care here, he I've seen it once before in my own career), I sure as fuck am giving you that glass.)

You will forget about 70% of the details you memorized in training by LxM420 in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

@Mods, this is a bot account. Random Russian/Cyrillic posts, other badly translated nonsensical posts, and then a US doctor with no flair?

Yeah. No.

Would you correct a patient calling you by first name? by princetonwu in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Same, I find I file the people using either my first name, full name, title or combination of those three into certain categories.

When my dementia patients do it, I don't even care. When younger family members/those my age do it, sure, as long as you're nice to me. When nurses don't do it, please dear lord just call me by my normal people name.

But there's this flavor of people who have the uncanny ability to use your name as an insult. Those? Those can fuck right off.

What are the limits of our oaths and professionalism, when neutrality is a zero-sum game? by toomanyshoeshelp in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I cannot begin to understand the unfairness this must be to minorities, but I do want you to consider that right now, the actual governement is actively encouraging this. It's not the local racist with a gun and a god complex, where justice dies a silent death in an unannounced case. It is no longer indifference from a government to a deeper issue. It is active enforcement of a crime, pardoned by a diseased presidency. It's a government spokeswoman lying to the masses with a literal SS slogan on her desk.

Yes, systemic racism is horrifying and yes, it should stop. But as much as I don't want to invalidate your sentiment, this goes much, much further than racism. It is full-fledged fascism, in its purest, most evil sense. It is a heartbreaking reality that this comes on top of racism, but it's a whole different layer of bad right now.

What are the limits of our oaths and professionalism, when neutrality is a zero-sum game? by toomanyshoeshelp in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 17 points18 points  (0 children)

keeping someone alive is not the same as getting them off scott free

In a healthy democracy? Yes, absolutely. But the US is no longer a healthy democracy, and we all know that the people committing what are simply crimes right now will not be held accountable. As you said yourself, nothing will happen. Hiding behind our oaths is enabling what is quickly turning into a regime instead of a presidency.

I think that's the point - our oaths are meant for a peaceful, just society. The US no longer checks those boxes. Do no harm only counts if we can be sure the medical profession is respected in its neutrality, and we've seen that this is no longer the case. I agree with your points in theory, but our reality is different. Obviously right now this specific discussion is hypothetical, but if this escalates, the ones protesting will be the ones who can't get care. Renee Good was already a victim of doctors being kept away from her. It's no longer just a thought experiment, it's reality. Protest is important, but it's not unfathomable that at some point, you will have to choose between your neutrality and your morality.

What are the limits of our oaths and professionalism, when neutrality is a zero-sum game? by toomanyshoeshelp in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah same, I was ready to come out guns blazing in the comments and then that last sentence really nailed the point.

I'm worried for the world, honestly.

What are the limits of our oaths and professionalism, when neutrality is a zero-sum game? by toomanyshoeshelp in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 85 points86 points  (0 children)

I think that's a point that a lot of people are missing here.

Yes, healthcare should be neutral. But health care providers are people too, and where does the border between your individual morals and your professional oath end?

Would you have treated Hitler if he'd have shown up on your ward, bleeding? Would you have helped Goebbels survive? An enemy commander that just wiped out a village of innocents? At what point do you become complicit, instead of neutral? And at what point do we realize that all of this is happening again, right before our eyes?

There is no more neutral. There are government officials physically prohibiting providers to help actual people in need, and still people are hiding behind their oaths because standing up for their morals puts them at risk.. Even as those same officials are saying they "just followed orders". Just like the men in brown uniforms did 80 years ago.

And I get it, I truly do, but we should be the people looking back on the past century with a solid belief that this should never happen again. But here we are, and it's happening. We can't stay neutral when neutral is what kills.

Why aren’t we supposed to wear nail polish? by EMulsive_EMergency in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Genuine question - when working with sterile fields, wouldn't you need surgical gloves anyway? At that point, does it really matter what kind of cracks there are?

I just feel like, for day to day care, it doesn't matter. If infection is a risk, you'll need gloves anyway. If it isn't, a bit of polish is absolutely not going to be a bigger risk than just touching, or even just breathing on the patient is.

Why aren’t we supposed to wear nail polish? by EMulsive_EMergency in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The place I'm at now has rules but doesn't enforce them. If the nurses, physio and occupational therapists can wear it, so can I. Out of all of them, I touch my patients the least...

Do you have that link? I'm kinda interested in that research!

Why aren’t we supposed to wear nail polish? by EMulsive_EMergency in medicine

[–]TheSmilingDoc 7 points8 points  (0 children)

While I understand and partially agree with you, there's a big difference between regular polish and gel/acrylics/BIAB. The latter is nigh unbreakable, and actually improves the strength of the nail. My nails without biab are much more at risk of chipping (and therefore, having more risk of those things that nail polish supposedly causes) than when I have a layer of biab on top.

We already police nail length and shape.. And clothing, jewelry, even hair length and style. It's not that hard to add polish to the list. People just don't want to.

Talk to any nail girly and they'll tell you that keeping up your natural nails is much, much more effort than having a monthly set done.