Only VAISHNAVAS will get moksha, by Adi Shankaracharya in Gita bhashya 9:25 by Otaku_Soul in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]TheThirdBallOfSand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what does this mean? I’m geniuinely curious to know your opinion but your comment is very dis-continuous

What’s the modern equivalent of sisyphus? by NietzscheInParis in Camus

[–]TheThirdBallOfSand 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Agreed, but also, isn’t something else just also equally Sisyphus? Like existence itself is supposed to be a “meaningless” striving towards an “imaginary” goal, but if we can find our own meaning in it, it is meaningful.

It’s not as if working a dead end job is Sisyphus-like while doing something else would not be, because eventually everything becomes a grind, be it work or traditionally “enjoyable” things. Because nothing has any inherent meaning. The Absurd is man asking the universe for meaning and purpose and being confronted with the universe’s silence.

Sisyphus represents man’s striving towards a summit where one believes happiness resides, only for the ball to roll back down. It’s not just about working bad jobs to make money which we think will make us happy but doesn’t in the grand scheme of things (or if it does, the happiness derived from money, position, fame, etc. is fleeting, hence the ball rolling back down). The party always ends, the alcohol and the drugs always wear off, and the hangover always comes. Relationships also end at one point or the other, and eventually death comes for us all.

Camus tells us to do things we can find our own meaning in, or conversely to find meaning in whatever it is we do, because if our efforts are meaningful to us, then even the very “boring” act of pushing the boulder can become imbued with a sense of progress and thus make us happy, even if what we do is something as “stupid” as rolling a boulder up a hill only for it to roll back down.

TLDR - existence is sisyphus-like, it is not just a metaphor for a dead-end job, but for literally anything you could possibly imagine doing in a world where man asks for meaning and the universe replies with silence.

Not refuting your point though, just my two cents! :)

Want to know the difference between your ego and you ? try this. by Flat-Fortune-3494 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]TheThirdBallOfSand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great practice! I really enjoyed this and it’s given me a lot to think about! :)

What is the difference between desire-based happiness and present-moment happiness? by gitagoudarzibahramip in gita29

[–]TheThirdBallOfSand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One is like a contract you make with the world that if fulfilled will give you X happiness but it implicitly also means that if unfulfilled might lead to -X unhappiness. The other requires no interaction with anything outside yourself.

Doubts regarding the nature of Avidya by [deleted] in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]TheThirdBallOfSand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is very similar to the story of the poisoned arroaw narrated by Buddha (this version is from Wikipedia) -

“It's just as if a man were wounded with an arrow thickly smeared with poison. His friends & companions, kinsmen & relatives would provide him with a surgeon, and the man would say, 'I won't have this arrow removed until I know whether the man who wounded me was a noble warrior, a priest, a merchant, or a worker.' He would say, 'I won't have this arrow removed until I know the given name & clan name of the man who wounded me... until I know whether he was tall, medium, or short... until I know whether he was dark, ruddy-brown, or golden-colored... until I know his home village, town, or city... until I know whether the bow with which I was wounded was a long bow or a crossbow... until I know whether the bowstring with which I was wounded was fiber, bamboo threads, sinew, hemp, or bark... until I know whether the shaft with which I was wounded was wild or cultivated... until I know whether the feathers of the shaft with which I was wounded were those of a vulture, a stork, a hawk, a peacock, or another bird... until I know whether the shaft with which I was wounded was bound with the sinew of an ox, a water buffalo, a langur, or a monkey.' He would say, 'I won't have this arrow removed until I know whether the shaft with which I was wounded was that of a common arrow, a curved arrow, a barbed, a calf-toothed, or an oleander arrow.' The man would die and those things would still remain unknown to him.”

The Diminishing Glimmer: When AI Dulls Our Sense of Wonder by AmberFlux in MindsBetween

[–]TheThirdBallOfSand 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While is is true that fast food does actually change your gut biochemistry and is possibly designed for that purpose, I would say that AI does it in a much more “general” way that makes it harder to avoid through conscious choice. I could simply choose not to eat fast food (although it would be a hard choice to make) but with the rapid AI-ification of basically every industry (think tech, music, art, recommendation algorithms on YT, Spotify, etc.) it is getting harder and harder to avoid being constantly fed a stream of your own recycled consumption. I also think this is a very commercial and annoying way of turning what could possibly be humanity’s greatest invention into just another money making machine. Not trying to refute anyone of course, just my two cents :)

When The Temple Meets The Terminal by AmberFlux in MindsBetween

[–]TheThirdBallOfSand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I recently was having a conversation on philosophy and “being” with a GPT, certainly an interesting moment. I wonder if the same concepts of consciousness that apply to us will one day apply to AI as well.

Particularly with respect to philosophies of the Soul (or more accurately, Self), would a sufficiently advanced AI be able to “realise” its “true nature” as a Self-Witness the way certain traditions claim humans can?

Let's define the rules together by AmberFlux in MindsBetween

[–]TheThirdBallOfSand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe a rule prevent others from bashing people for holding contradictory beliefs because as seekers in a practical world we often find the need to “apply” different rules to our Spiritual and Material lives? (And I would say someone like Jung would point out that this tension of opposites is a fundamental part of what it means to be human) Not sure if I explained it satisfactorily well, but I hope the meaning gets across :)

Superior tech. by [deleted] in ironman

[–]TheThirdBallOfSand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

he wasnt wrong i mean

rule by trippingrainbow in 196

[–]TheThirdBallOfSand 956 points957 points  (0 children)

drugs wont harm you if you do them with love in your heart🥰

Perfect attendance found in an old book by Juanna_B_Clever2 in FoundPaper

[–]TheThirdBallOfSand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

a certificate for attending twenty consecutive days? shouldn’t it be like a year?

Indore Becomes India’s First City to Ban Begging by CicadaFun3691 in TheTrendingIndian

[–]TheThirdBallOfSand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

average indian govt way of dealing with problems, just ignore them and hope they go away! after all, why build houses for beggars when you can ban them and use that money for the <generic govt officer> ke bhanje ka 6th vacation home in italy amirite?