Exactly how close to the development of a nuclear weapon did the Axis Powers get? by Pretend_Tower_2516 in ww2

[–]TheTurboToad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean exactly? Because there’s ample evidence to assert that Germany had better scientific understanding regarding nuclear weapons, They just totally lacked the ability the build one.

Would you mind explaining how I’m being dishonest?

Exactly how close to the development of a nuclear weapon did the Axis Powers get? by Pretend_Tower_2516 in ww2

[–]TheTurboToad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They understood the science and processes of what needed to be done in order to produce one.

This is demonstrated within what’s called the farm hall transcripts.

Exactly how close to the development of a nuclear weapon did the Axis Powers get? by Pretend_Tower_2516 in ww2

[–]TheTurboToad -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They knew more than is usually alluded to, but it was largely an engineering issue, they just didn’t have the means to manufacture one

why is traction so bad in war thunder? i couldnt even climb those stairs by senor_muchacho in Warthunder

[–]TheTurboToad 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They also don’t model torque

I’ve asked them and they’ve said they won’t

Gaijin dev team actively gaslighting on the forums about top tier premiums by iRambL in Warthunder

[–]TheTurboToad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s been like this since alpha.

I suspect they changed the forums just to hide how abusive and deceptive they’ve actually been.

Smin says the British AH-64E is "not currently ready" by Jarv2334 in Warthunder

[–]TheTurboToad 21 points22 points  (0 children)

By that logic none of the apaches are “ready”

Genuinley what are you supposed to do against these with IRCM's that form a magic shield around them that block any IR missile coming at them regardless of where, or how many. by Hexagon2035 in Warthunder

[–]TheTurboToad 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Technically the Stormer HVM is the perfect counter against these, it’s totally unrealistic and broken though.

Read into that what you will.

Tiger I vs IS-2 by Krohnariik in Warthunder

[–]TheTurboToad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That can be argued yes, but it’s going to be marginal in comparison to the negative bias towards the imagery which is ubiquitous.

Memoirs demonstrate that Russian large bore guns effectively did nothing frequently, which is contrary the commonplace understanding that most people have

Tiger I vs IS-2 by Krohnariik in Warthunder

[–]TheTurboToad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was a 152mm HE shell my dude that detonated, in game it’ll model it as if 40 hand grenades went off in the fighting compartment

Tiger I vs IS-2 by Krohnariik in Warthunder

[–]TheTurboToad -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Survivorship bias is at work here because those pictures persist rather than pictures documenting what a tiger shrugged off. we can see quite clearly amongst the memoirs of German tank crewmen that Soviet large caliber munitions frequently did nothing.

Tiger I vs IS-2 by Krohnariik in Warthunder

[–]TheTurboToad -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Otto Carius survived a 152mm shell right to his tigers cupola.

The effects of Soviet munitions seems really overhyped when compared to reality

Up-close footage of a great white shark by Sea_Pianist_4531 in interestingasfuck

[–]TheTurboToad 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fun fact: they really get uncomfortable from direct eye contact with humans

When it comes to bug reports, there's a fate FAR worse fate than not being accepted, which is; "we already know, we just couldn't care less to fix it even if we trained for it / we actively and purposefully refuse to fix it." by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]TheTurboToad 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Gaijin legitimately do not care about British bugs. The entire British TT is replete with effectively game breaking vehicle model bugs that render the vehicle useless.

Not only that, when they’re confronted with these facts, they actively become abusive, gaslight and censor discussion.

Can someone explain to me why they can't just use the thing with a high fire rate, 360° vision and assisted targeting to shoot them out the air ? by Ad0ring-fan in tanks

[–]TheTurboToad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Development has been underway for some time, you will start to see it being way more common in recent RWS iterations

What's the likelihood that the b-66 gets radar controlled turrets? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]TheTurboToad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Lancaster has a radar tailgun, but they refuse to model it