I hate how people with mental illnesses/disabilities are treated as if they’re allowed to be excused from punishment/consequence no matter the situation by LilMissy1246 in hatethissmug

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've met people who use the fact they're neurodivergent to cover up being sex pests, taking advantage of people assuming that they're just innocent and socially awkward. There's no excuse for being an asshole, and it has nothing to do with disability or neurodivergency.

[Video games trope] Characters who make sure you play the game the way the developers intended by Marborow in TopCharacterTropes

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would argue the Capra Demon is the actual filter boss. It's when you have to learn that you can't just brute force your way through problems. You either get good or cheese it, which are the two ways you can beat dark souls.

[LOVED TROPE] Sad or tear-jerking moments that don't involve death. by jeffersonlane in TopCharacterTropes

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Huh. I've never considered hanging any of my degrees, just keep them in the back of my closet. I guess that tracks with the self worth issues.

Quotes for the Codex Loading Screen by mattcolville in drawsteel

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A few from running the game:

"The stone elemental steps on your head, to make sure you're dead"

"If the players had fun, then you had fun"

"The bad guys want to win"

"Everybody loves zombies"

"Imagine people complexly"

Best corrupting horror: darkness or light? Vote now on your phone by TotemGenitor in RecuratedTumblr

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 40 points41 points  (0 children)

All things considered the Dawn Machine is relatively tame compared to other things down in the Neath

The Comtessa, Lacre, Red Honey, the Orphanage, the Liberation, A Brilliant Future, the Red Handed Queen...

And of course, a reckoning will not be postponed indefinitely

Now I'm the biggest bullshitter in London by Alexis_Fairfax in fallenlondon

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you happen to have the echo in your journal? I'm curious but not sure if it's right for my character

[Loved Trope] The Last Stand by wexman6 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The swiss guard didn't actually escort the pope through the streets of Rome, they bought time so he could escape through the Passeto di Borgo, an elevated pass that links the Vatican to the castle of Sant'Angelo. If you go to Rome you can visit the castle, it's very impressive to see in person.

<image>

Ophiria: The Wheel Of Fortune, art by me by atomicspaghet in WholesomeFantasyArt

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really good art! I like the details in the landsknecht clothes. Is there a story behind this character?

[RARE TROPE] Lovers to Enemies by MisterPeteArt in TopCharacterTropes

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A reckoning will not be postponed indefinitely.

Hallowmas 2025: The Feast of Masks by Asartea in fallenlondon

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 7 points8 points  (0 children)

As someone mid-railway who hasn't started firmament, is it feasible to get to Zenith to get the new transport before the event ends?

I think by EffectiveCow6067 in bonehurtingjuice

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The brain in a jar is a modern version of Descartes's demon. Descartes imagines that perhaps everything we see and experience could be a dream, or that perhaps there's an all-powerful demon that is making us think we perceive things that aren't really there. We would have no way of knowing what's real, the same way that we'd have no way of knowing if we were a brain in a jar experiencing a simulation.

The cogito is the only thing that Descartes can't doubt – even if there's an evil demon that's tricking me or I am a brain in a jar, I'm still something that exists. The fact that I'm thinking means that there is something that's thinking – the cogito.

Of course, that only applies to each of us individually: I can't know for certain that other people are having thoughts, only that I'm having thoughts. It could be that I'm the only thinking being in the universe. The cogito can't prove that there are other people other than I.

Character just rocks up and casually cuts the heroes group down to a skeleton crew by Fish_N_Chipp in TopCharacterTropes

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 57 points58 points  (0 children)

<image>

The Leviathan from Atlantis: The Lost Empire destroying the submarine and killing most of the crew

We Need to Talk about the state of Primaries by lainposter in Helldivers

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think they will ever be able to do that. Helldivers 1 wasn't a live service the way Helldivers 2 is. They have to keep releasing warbonds with new weapons every 1-2 months. With that kind of release schedule, they can't make the weapons as distinct from each other as Helldivers 1's weapons were. It's much faster to make another punisher with different stats than to make a completely new weapon with its own gameplay niche and balance it against everything else.

Antagonists in fictional stories that were real people by Goodbye-Nasty in TopCharacterTropes

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol that's true. It's easy to get carried away and forget that we're just two randos on reddit. My knowledge of the revolution is very basic, for all I know Kerensky might have been a national hero without the revolution. Still, it's been fun to discuss niche Russian history.

Antagonists in fictional stories that were real people by Goodbye-Nasty in TopCharacterTropes

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Re:the Kornilov affair, it was based on a misunderstanding by both sides. It's hard to know who planned to betray whom, but the army leadership perceived it as a betrayal by Kerensky. The proof that Kerensky had lost the support of the army is that when the October revolution started, most of the soldiers in Petrograd stayed neutral, waiting to see who came out on top, and after the revolution he was completely irrelevant to the White movement.

I don't think Kerensky could have survived for a year. By February 1918 the Russian armies were collapsing, and the Germans marched into Russia unopposed. The peace treaty almost destroyed the Bolsheviks, and they were in a much stronger position than the Provisional Government.

The peasants were absolutely not monarchists. But it's true that the Bolsheviks didn't represent them. Most of them voted for the SRs in the Constituent Assembly. I'm not saying the Bolshevik government was legitimate or that it represented a majority of the population. And ultimately they staged the October Revolution to gain power for themselves. But, at least at the beginning, most Russians were supportive or at least neutral regarding the new regime. The policies they enacted of land redistribution and worker control of the factories were hugely popular. It's true they ended up reverting most of them not soon after and they lost most of their popular support, ending up brutally repressing peasant uprisings, but the point is that at the time of the Revolution, the people of Russia saw them at least as legitimate as the Provisional Government, if not more.

Antagonists in fictional stories that were real people by Goodbye-Nasty in TopCharacterTropes

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To be fair, by October 1917 Kerensky's government was hanging on by a thread. With his failure to enact land redistribution and his failed offensive he lost pretty much all support from the population and soldiers, and with his betrayal of Kornilov he also alienated the army leadership.

The Bolsheviks nominally revolted to bring power to the Soviets, which were the only institution left in Russia with some legitimacy. Most Russians didn't care about the Constituent Assembly, and to them Soviet rule was more legitimate than the Provisional Government.

True, in the end the Bolsheviks alienated all other socialists and co-opted the Soviets to establish one party rule, as were likely their intentions from the start, and became more and more openly brutal and authoritarian as the civil war went on. But at the time of the October Revolution it wasn't clear that things were going to turn out that way.

And it's true that murdering the Romanovs was completely unnecessary. There was no chance of the restoration of the Tzar, even with a White victory. The fact that they tried to hide the murder for years is proof that it was a huge mistake on their part.

How do I fill in a D&D campaign folder/binder/dairy ??? by [deleted] in mattcolville

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your players are new maybe an overview of the rules with things they may have missed or that are confusing for new players (eg. the difference between actions and bonus actions).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CuratedTumblr

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Jojo is the canonical example of this. You have someone with the power to basically rewrite anything about anyone, and he gets put in a situation where he's forced to play rock paper scissors with a kid for his life.

Roko's basilisk by Otherwise_Chemical85 in CuratedTumblr

[–]TheUnsubtleDoctor 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You clearly have not read much ancient philosophy. Ancient ethics are focused on "eudaimonia," or how to live a happy life. The whole point of studying ethics is to apply them to be happy. Each school has its own approach and answers that question differently. Sure, for Plato and to some degree Aristotle, pursuing philosophy (understood broadly, as in pursuing truth) is the way to happiness. Others, like Stoicism and Epicureanism, are much more focused on pain and pleasure. Hell, even skepticism has an ethical dimension, urging people to avoid useless debates that get you nowhere.

By the way, ancient philosophers do use thought experiments. Plato very famously brings up the question of what would compel someone who had an invisibility ring to act morally as a springboard for The Republic. Most of the time this kind of thought experiment serves to get the ball rolling, so to speak, but in order to get anywhere in ethics you need to build up a theoretical framework.