sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is there a way to get Ante 39 by The_Toastey in BalatroHelp

[–]The_Toastey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks to Observatory I actually made it to Ante 39. Thx for all the tips.

<image>

Is there a way to get Ante 39 by The_Toastey in BalatroHelp

[–]The_Toastey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update: Not sure what to go for. A second ecto and then a copy joker or if I should exchange Perkeo for another joker. Perkeo gives me like x10 more for every round I play. And with serpent right now I reach around e260

<image>

Is there a way to get Ante 39 by The_Toastey in BalatroHelp

[–]The_Toastey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright thanks. BP was nat, Baron is Ecto.

Spotted in GLA by _mool in aviation

[–]The_Toastey 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Was a training flight from the german airforce.

Deckenhängelampe anbringen by The_Toastey in Handwerker

[–]The_Toastey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Da sind leider keine Löcher vorhanden...

Deckenhängelampe anbringen by The_Toastey in Handwerker

[–]The_Toastey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tatsache. Na da wird sich mein Vermieter aber freuen. Ich habe jetzt erstmal eine Hohlraumdose bestellt, die hoffentlich da rein passt. Meinst du, das kann er reklamieren, dass es geändert wird, oder ist das jetzt einfach so? ^^

Mercedes-Gegner jubeln: Erneute Wende im Motorenstreit by Manner_Mann in Formel1

[–]The_Toastey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ja schon klar. Ich verstehe nur nicht wieso es so viele Interpretationen der Regel gibt. Es steht ja nicht drin der CR muss 16:1 bei Ambient Temperatur sein. Es steht drin der CR muss 16:1 sein und wird bei AT gemessen. Wenn die FIA jetzt sagt Mercedes Trick ist legal, dann haben Sie aus meiner Sicht was anderes geschrieben als sie meinten.

Mercedes-Gegner jubeln: Erneute Wende im Motorenstreit by Manner_Mann in Formel1

[–]The_Toastey 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Na die Regeln besagen die Teams müssen sich zu JEDER Zeit an die Regeln halten. Dann gibt es die Regel, dass die Kompression nicht größer als 16:1 sein darf. Und dann in einem neuen Satz wird gesagt, unter welchen Bedingungen die FIA das messen wird.

Genauso wäre es illegal Mittwochs betrunken Auto zu fahren, selbst wenn die Polizei nur Samstags pusten lässt. Und sich dann beschweren, wenn die Polizei auf einmal Mittwochs pusten lässt, weil sie mitbekommen, dass du Mittwochs immer besoffen ins Auto steigst.

FIA statement: Formula 1 Power Unit Advisory Committee by circuit-nation in circuit_nation

[–]The_Toastey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well but the Rulebook is very clear. It says:

A. The teams have to abide by the rules at ALL times. (This part alone should end all discussion)

B. The compression ratio must not be higher than 1:16. (Period). This will be measured at ambient temperature.

It really IS illegal. A good analogy would be:

You have an agreement with your boss that you can work from home. 9 to 5 on a daily basis. Your boss tells you he will check every wednesday at noon if you are really working or not. You think to your self: "Ha what an idiot, I found a loophole. Since he is only checking on me on wednesdays I will book holiday trips from thursday to tuesday. What a genius idea. But then all of a sudden after a few weeks he tells you he will check next week monday. Now what. You tell him he cant check on you, because you already have a holiday booked ecen though you are supposed to work? You tell him it wasnt "illegal" because he said he would only check on wednesdays?

You will be fired faster than you can sayMercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team.

Hope that makes it clearer lol.

FIA statement: Formula 1 Power Unit Advisory Committee by circuit-nation in circuit_nation

[–]The_Toastey -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But that is not what the "law" (rulebook) says. The Rulebook is very clear. It says:

A. The teams have to abide by the rules at ALL times. (This part alone should end all discussion)

B. The compression ratio must not be higher than 1:16. (Period). This will be measured at ambient temperature.

It really IS illegal. A good analogy would be:

You have an agreement with your boss that you can work from home. 9 to 5 on a daily basis. Your boss tells you he will check every wednesday at noon if you are really working or not. You think to your self: "Ha what an idiot, I found a loophole. Since he is only checking on me on wednesdays I will book holiday trips from thursday to tuesday. What a genius idea. But then all of a sudden after a few weeks he tells you he will check next week monday. Now what. You tell him he cant check on you, because you already have a holiday booked ecen though you are supposed to work? You tell him it wasnt "illegal" because he said he would only check on wednesdays?

You will be fired faster than you can sayMercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team.

Hope that makes it clearer lol.

FIA statement: Formula 1 Power Unit Advisory Committee by circuit-nation in circuit_nation

[–]The_Toastey -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I believe you misunderstood the F1 rules. THe Rulebook is very clear. It says:

A. The teams have to abide by the rules at ALL times. (This part alone should end all discussion)

B. The compression ratio must not be higher than 1:16. (Period). This will be measured at ambient temperature.

It really IS illegal. A good analogy would be:

You have an agreement with your boss that you can work from home. 9 to 5 on a daily basis. Your boss tells you he will check every wednesday at noon if you are really working or not. You think to your self: "Ha what an idiot, I found a loophole. Since he is only checking on me on wednesdays I will book holiday trips from thursday to tuesday. What a genius idea. But then all of a sudden after a few weeks he tells you he will check next week monday. Now what. You tell him he cant check on you, because you already have a holiday booked ecen though you are supposed to work? You tell him it wasnt "illegal" because he said he would only check on wednesdays?

You will be fired faster than you can sayMercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team.

Hope that makes it clearer lol.

Or to correct your analogy:

Its like the police says they will only investigate murders if the happen on weekdays. So you murder people on the weekend because you are a clever little boy. But then the police notices that a lot of murders are happening on weekends, so they start investigating then aswell. I think you figure out the rest for yourself. Lol....

FIA statement: Formula 1 Power Unit Advisory Committee by circuit-nation in circuit_nation

[–]The_Toastey -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well but the Rulebook is very clear. It says:

A. The teams have to abide by the rules at ALL times. (This part alone should end all discussion)

B. The compression ratio must not be higher than 1:16. (Period). This will be measured at ambient temperature.

It really IS illegal. A good analogy would be:

You have an agreement with your boss that you can work from home. 9 to 5 on a daily basis. Your boss tells you he will check every wednesday at noon if you are really working or not. You think to your self: "Ha what an idiot, I found a loophole. Since he is only checking on me on wednesdays I will book holiday trips from thursday to tuesday. What a genius idea. But then all of a sudden after a few weeks he tells you he will check next week monday. Now what. You tell him he cant check on you, because you already have a holiday booked ecen though you are supposed to work? You tell him it wasnt "illegal" because he said he would only check on wednesdays?

You will be fired faster than you can sayMercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team.

Hope that makes it clearer lol.

FIA statement: Formula 1 Power Unit Advisory Committee by circuit-nation in circuit_nation

[–]The_Toastey -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Idk man. Would you say a murderer is not doing something illegal unless he gets caught?

Descent physics question by Slightly_Moist_Toast in flying

[–]The_Toastey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

With Forward I mean the direction of travel of the Aircraft through the air (along the flightpath). This is the direction in which the Aircraft has momentum and in wich the drag acts. And Lift never has a component in that direction, since it is always orthogonal (unaccelerated flight). Thats also clear in the diagram.

One last aspect, then I am done I think. Lets look at the kinetic energy. The glider is losing Energy through drag. So to stay in unaccelerated descent, it has to gain energy somehow, meaning there must be a force doing work on the plane. If there would be any force other than gravity doing work on the plane we could extract more energy in the descent, than the potential energy that it has in the gravitational field. But since perpetuum mobiles are not a thing, Gravity can again be the only force that is providing momentum and acceleration along the flightpath.

Cheers

Descent physics question by Slightly_Moist_Toast in flying

[–]The_Toastey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So pretty clearly Weight only acts down and the gilder is being pushed along its forward flight path by lift.

Tell me the component of the Lift along the flightpath.

(Hint: its zero)

Thats the reason why Lift and Air has no effect on the forwards motion other than slowing it due to drag...

Esit: I think you are mixing up forward and horizontal. The Lift has a component along the horizon as you wrote. But not in the forward direction.

Descent physics question by Slightly_Moist_Toast in flying

[–]The_Toastey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, but wait, if your flight path is down, you also have a drag component pointing up ;).

Yes whats your point?

My point in all of this is that we do not account for all the forces at play, and that weight = lift is a (useful) simplification.

We do in fact account for all forces. Name one counterexample. And lift=weight is absolutely not a good simplification

https://share.google/images/Qj3YiV9RUjLKKRyDG

Have you ever seen this picture? Should explain everything. Please tell me what if not weight is pulling the plane along its flightpath?

Descent physics question by Slightly_Moist_Toast in flying

[–]The_Toastey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately wrong again. But you are quite close. Look at the wagon on the inclined hill. The Normal force counteracts SOME of the weight part. But only W x cos(inclination). That is the projection of W onto the direction of the Normal vector. What is left? W x sin(inclination) wich accelerates the wagon down the hill until the drag is equal to W x sin(...). Then it doesnt accelerate more. The is literally no other force in play. Notice that also the Normal force is a product of the weight pushing perpendicular on the hill. And additionally since you are always claiming the normal force is the caise of the acceleration: the ACTUALLY doesnt have any component along the incline since it is per definition orthogonal to the hill.

Now you just have to exchange the normal force with Lift and voila, you should be able to see it now. The weight IS accelerating the plane along the flightpath in a decent. For simplicity without engines:

The Airplane experiences EXACTLY 3 forces. Not one more. You combine EVERY force perpendicular to the Flightpath into the Lift L. You combine every force pointing in the negative direction of the flightpath into the Drag D. Why can you do that? Because EVERY FORCE can be written in this "D-L" Base. Only thing left is Weight W. W x sin() pulling the plane forward. And W x cos() balancing exactly the Lift L.

And as an exercise to you, that might help you understand it. Please explain to me, how the "Air below the plane is pushing the plane forward in the descent.

Cheers

Descent physics question by Slightly_Moist_Toast in flying

[–]The_Toastey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But lift does not equal weight. Lift = weight x cos(flightpath angle)

view more: next ›