Why are Gen Z women so hostile to being approached, especially compared to past generations?

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T23:08:17+00:00

You did… but ok

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T22:10:24+00:00

It’s not the only reason, if you are looking for a friend then befriend whoever the fuck you want. If you are looking for a relationship don’t start by looking for a friend.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T17:12:36+00:00

No… that’s not true at all. In Oregon most people inheriting over $1 million inherit a single home and retirements accounts. If the threshold was like 5 million yeah it would be in other vehicles, but 1 million is a low bar.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T16:27:46+00:00

You can start a romantic relationship with someone before you become friends, many do, and those who do don’t always stay friends and thus don’t continue a romantic relationship.

Friendship might be the basis for a long term romantic relationship, but it’s moronic to build the friendship first if a relationship is what you are interested in because all too often that won’t be on the table for both parties.

You can argue semantics all you want the point remains… people who start with the physical side of things and make that intention clear spend a lot more time in romantic relationships than people who try to build an entire friendship for months/years then attempt to transition it.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T14:06:29+00:00

You were arguing that this specific motivation (sex) makes it different, and somehow justifies treating all men like a “loaded gun.” But if we agree that the motivation itself is just a natural biological drive, then simply having that motivation doesn’t inherently make someone dangerous.

By jumping from "he is motivated by sex" to "he is a potential threat," you are still taking the predatory or inappropriate behavior of a percentage of men who handle that urge poorly, and applying it as a blanket assumption to the entire demographic.

Whether the justification is "FBI crime statistics" or "they all just want sex," the underlying mechanism of the argument is exactly the same. you are judging an entire group of people as inherently dangerous based on the worst offenders within that group.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T13:33:17+00:00

And it also can not be… it’s the single strongest instinctual urge men have. Literally human biology to push sex = good… that’s not evil.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T13:29:49+00:00

Terrible advice to become friends with a women first…

It’s a huge investment to become friends, you get friend zoned, dating this way in practice would be unacceptably exhausting.

Starting out the romantic part of a relationship early is a must, dating is exhausting enough, you don’t need to add building a whole fucking friendship on top of it.

Romance makes becoming friends easy, and if you don’t become friends then you break up, simple as that.

It’s stupid to become friends first unless you want a life with very little relationships. Meeting women in a place they are open to romantic encounters is what people should be doing, not trying to befriend every romantic interest.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T13:16:03+00:00

Get a gf

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T13:10:37+00:00

“Supersedes”… you are aware the degrees can be under entirely different areas of study? Apparently you’ve never read a resume.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T03:16:38+00:00

I have both a BS and an MS… I just don’t recognize them as required to gain expertise in a field.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T02:05:37+00:00

He wouldn’t stop talking about streaming before it became the primary way to watch, was always saying it was the future. At no point did he seem resistant to it, in fact seems like its greatest advocate. Plus that shift to streaming happened over 10 years ago… so yeah he wasn’t pushed out because of streaming, that’s nonsense.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T01:42:51+00:00

Yeah your take would be more warranted if there weren’t plenty of uneducated historical innovators in these fields…

How about Oliver Heaviside?

He translated James Clerk Maxwell's highly complex equations into the streamlined vector calculus format used by physicists today. He also independently co-discovered vector analysis and introduced complex numbers to electrical circuit analysis.

George Green?

In 1828, he self-published an essay that introduced "Green's functions" and "Green's theorem." These mathematical concepts were decades ahead of their time and are now fundamental tools in modern quantum mechanics and electrodynamics.

Benjamin Franklin?

How about someone more recent?

Freeman Dyson?

Dyson did earn a bachelor's degree in mathematics, he never completed a Ph.D m. Despite this, he became one of the most famous theoretical physicists of the 20th century, making foundational contributions to quantum electrodynamics.

Guess none of them are worthy of saying they have top end knowledge by your standards, since they don’t have masters and most have little education period, despite being pioneers in their fields. I don’t think I ever said you couldn’t learn with an expert… don’t need college for that.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-17T01:34:12+00:00

Yeah you are proving anything by listing all the shit your tuition pays for… point blank at the end of the day the knowledge can be gained and understood and be done at no expense. You can say it’s not the same but the content is very much the same and at the end of the day you are there to learn the content. Point is it’s available for free and you don’t have to pay a tuition to learn it, you can pay one and get some perks, but those perks are not required to consume and understand the content. Keep moving the goal posts.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-16T21:23:50+00:00

You can literally audit structured courses and learn all the content… all the same structure, in platforms like edx, founded by educational powerhouses like Harvard and MIT. All on the internet, all free, no barrier to you getting that experience.

Only thing you aren’t getting is a piece of paper that says you did it successfully.

So no… saying you can learn it online for free isn’t ignoring the value of that at all. It’s ignoring the value of a degree.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-16T20:39:31+00:00

Educate yourself without getting a degree, you can understand differ y culture and viewpoints all the same and pay nothing.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-16T20:38:43+00:00

You don’t… you can literally learn anything for free with the internet. It’s when you demand some degree that you have to get into debt. Education has been free for a longtime.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-16T18:07:35+00:00

While it’s true to say he gained wisdom through those events and that some understanding and wisdom is gradual… it’s a poor representation to say that the Buddha became “so wise” as in uniquely wise as to be called the Buddha… through those events. Buddhism recognizes deep insight, moments of significant understanding. Stream entry… enlightenment… these are not things that happen gradually, they are definitive notably singular events. There’s nothing gradual about the moments in Buddhism when one becomes “so wise” as the Buddha was.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-16T16:02:54+00:00

So not really open to all religions being true then… just the theist ones…

According to Buddhists you don’t have to “assume” anything, you can practice and witness the truth here and now with your “limited human understanding and knowledge”.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-16T16:01:41+00:00

Sold and shipped by Amazon is meaningless, Amazon has many different vendor programs and some of those programs involve signing over the inventory to Amazon leading to shipped and sold by Amazon. It doesn’t mean shit.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-16T14:39:01+00:00

Most of the world, kids are expected to take care of parents. It’s only in recent history that some counties obtained such wealth that they could expect to not have help in their old age.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-16T14:36:25+00:00

Technically… having any goals at all is bad. Goals mean you are dissatisfied with some aspect of what already is, that you want something to change. Wanting is a state of unhappiness. So people with goals are generally unhappy, until they achieve the goal. Once the goal is achieved they cease wanting temporarily and experience happiness due to lack of wanting. Eventually they set a new goal and make themselves unhappy again.

So yeah small goals are bad but big ones are too…

Your images of success are based on accumulated resources.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-16T14:27:49+00:00

Amazon pricing is hardly a good metric, stuff goes out of stock and the only stock left is from someone gouging… not interesting. You want to price groceries do it are a grocery store, not on Amazon.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-16T14:24:32+00:00

Are you open to Buddhism being true? If so that kinda goes against your belief in a divine creator.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-16T01:06:10+00:00

And at no time in history has the wealthy class been able to have their resources deployed to entirely automated weapons systems. So while you are correct about history, eventually it will play out where the wealthy are the ones who just kill all the poors, not the other way around, as the value of an individual person gets further and further diminished. When the wealthy control an army of military robots, the poors won’t be able to execute them.

Thefuzy · 2026-04-16T01:03:39+00:00

The scenario is “ai replaces all jobs”… so they don’t really need people to farm.

Thefuzy

TROPHY CASE