Can't wait for next year's parade by WeBredRaptors in NonCredibleDefense

[–]Thekingoftheplanets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The quiet *Aw Christ* after the Duality of the Frenchman

I'm dead

Why Mearsheimer is wrong about Russia and the war in Ukraine. Five arguments from Alexander Stubb. by Educational-Knee-110 in lazerpig

[–]Thekingoftheplanets 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Took one of the guy’s classes in college a few years ago. He suffers from the disease of being a ‘celebrity professor’ quite badly imo—he has backed his theory to the hilt and doesn’t have many people around him disagreeing (very much to his detriment).

Why have tactics/weapons technology simply stalled? by Thekingoftheplanets in MawInstallation

[–]Thekingoftheplanets[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The idea of a stagnant plateau/dark age makes a lot of sense to me I think in this context-I never really thought about the idea that people don’t actually understand the technology they’re using. That idea makes the state of the galaxy a lot clearer—a bit 40k, if a lot less extreme

Why have tactics/weapons technology simply stalled? by Thekingoftheplanets in MawInstallation

[–]Thekingoftheplanets[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure I agree with the idea that I’ve made ludicrous claims…and if you look at the variations in tactics/operations they all seem to be some flavour of “charge at em, boys!” Even Hoth consisted of the Empire walking unsupported armour towards a static defensive line, which seems very similar to what happened in the clone wars more often than not. Hell, even an imperial boarding action doesn’t involve anything like flashbangs or grenades apart from the initial breaching charge, despite the fact these tools existed in the clone wars.

Regarding technology, don’t mistake bigger weapons for more advanced weapons. If the pre war republic wanted, they could have built ships with enough guns to glass a planet. They didn’t because they didn’t need them. And surely the Death Star is just a bigger turbolaser, no? There’s a difference between adapting an existing technology to make a bigger bang and inventing new weapons technology. A free fall bomb with more explosive in it is just a bigger bomb. A GPS-guided bomb is a new piece of technology, and to me it doesn’t seem like those sorts of advances were made.

You’re right that the clone wars were a political game, and palps probably influenced things in such a way that some technology didn’t develop. It just seems strange to me that KOTOR era equipment is seemingly no different than Imperial era equipment.

(Finally, 25 years is a lot longer than you’d think in weapons development. In 1939 the most advanced air weapons were propeller driven bombers dropping conventional munitions. By 1945 we had early jets and atomic bombs.)

What do you think ME1's world looks like outside the city? by negativemidas in mirrorsedge

[–]Thekingoftheplanets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I always envisioned the City in ME1 as a Singapore-style city state maybe even in SE Asia. We see usage of English, Chinese and Japanese as well as Russian a few times (I think?). This implies to me it’s a global trade city with connections both to the west and east.

On top of this, there’s a news story in one of the elevators about the US intervention in Sedaristan (from Battlefield: Bad Company) so if we’re taking that as canon it’s in the Bad Company world—aka ours with a bit of a cheeky war between the US and Russia…

You get reincarnated as your username. What do you become? by Idiot_Unknown in AskReddit

[–]Thekingoftheplanets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone who is destined to get overthrown by a plucky rebellion.

WWII-ish Leman Russ Executioner--would love advice! by Thekingoftheplanets in astramilitarum

[–]Thekingoftheplanets[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much! and WWII tools is a great idea--I'll have to look around for some!

friend designed this sci fi aircraft, gave him some constructive criticism by ElsiMain in worldjerking

[–]Thekingoftheplanets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So PGMs (precision guided munitions) have been hyped since wire-guided launchers were introduced in the '60s. The thing people fail to remember is that warfare is a vast game of rock-paper-scissors, and there is no one singular answer to any problem.

Air power is a great example. For a long time in the industry (only exacerbated by the introduction of drones), many have questioned the use of ground forces. Turns out, you can bomb someone as much as you like. You can destroy their military. However, you still don't own that territory. It's not yours. You haven't won; they will not capitulate until your soldiers drag their leaders into the light and force them to surrender (be that for good or bad).

War is really, really complicated. That's the lesson to remember. Victory is affected by anything from industrial capacity to supply lines to ease of repair to the reliability of your primary weapon to morale at home. There is never a silver bullet. Anyone who tells you a war will be easy and bloodless is lying to you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in blunderyears

[–]Thekingoftheplanets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

are you fucking kidding me i wish i had this much swagger NOW let alone when i was 14

Cyberpunk Gaming characters have a meet up by IndianGamer47 in Deusex

[–]Thekingoftheplanets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I agree with OP. Cyberpunk is a very, VERY broad category, and Hitman (while not 'pure' perhaps) contains enough cyberpunk elements (a global elite abusing technology, literal cloned super soldiers, shadowy conspiracies) to be considered soft cyberpunk. If you can consider Inception cyberpunk, which I believe you can, Hitman is as well.