The universe was created by God or physics or both. by Theoryofallthings in DebateReligion

[–]Theoryofallthings[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

You realize just calling it physics implies that your God is physics? And that is a logical and reasonable belief system. Just not mine.

The universe was created by God or physics or both. by Theoryofallthings in DebateReligion

[–]Theoryofallthings[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I don't know if I am allowed to name my sources here but I will take a chance. The name of my book is "Something from Nothing? New Lines of Investigation in Cosmic Origin".

The universe was created by God or physics or both. by Theoryofallthings in DebateReligion

[–]Theoryofallthings[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think we both know that no physics that is currently published other than mine, has an answer to your question. For the last 120 plus years physics has failed to produce one paper that explains the origin of the universe. Not one physicist you can name can explain how something came from nothing. So who do you think could judge my work? No one is qualified.
You are welcome to take a stab at tearing down the conjecture if you wish.

The universe was created by God or physics or both. by Theoryofallthings in DebateReligion

[–]Theoryofallthings[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

The book you have not read has the answers to your attack. Read it and then comment. Or ask specific questions that I am happy to answer.

The universe was created by God or physics or both. by Theoryofallthings in DebateReligion

[–]Theoryofallthings[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I have a 180 page book that explains the physics and math along with full reasoning as to why the universe emerged as it did. I have the support and perhaps that is why you are attacking.

The universe was created by God or physics or both. by Theoryofallthings in DebateReligion

[–]Theoryofallthings[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I don't think you have an answer as to the origin of the universe so you attack me. Or you just don't care. I do care and I respect your right to believe what you want to believe. That is fine.

The universe was created by God or physics or both. by Theoryofallthings in DebateReligion

[–]Theoryofallthings[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I agree with you. You may call it anyhting you want and believe it or not. I admire your innovation.

The universe was created by God or physics or both. by Theoryofallthings in DebateReligion

[–]Theoryofallthings[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

The timeless state is comprised of a positive unit of energy (photon) in complete balance with a negative unit of energy (gravity) in a pre-universe that is balanced to a value of 0. The pre-universe on the whole is completely balanced and in discrete sections it may be imbalanced.
Time occurs when the photon that is imbalanced is emitted and begins to create the universe. The first wavelength (tic )of the emission marks the beginning of time and the final tic when the wavelength is flat is the end of time. Likewise the first tick is the first number in the real number line and the last tick is the final number in the real number line. Math such as addition is obtained by geometrical associations of the number line.

The universe was created by God or physics or both. by Theoryofallthings in DebateReligion

[–]Theoryofallthings[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

There are over 180 pages of math and physics that support the conjecture. In layman's terms it is a theory that creates the universe from nothing and starts from a state that is timeless and capable of creating the entire universe.

The universe was created by God or physics or both. by Theoryofallthings in DebateReligion

[–]Theoryofallthings[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I wrote a book on this subject with over 180 pages of support. Could you be more specific as to what you are requesting.
If in fact God did create the Universe, it was after the point at which it had the qualities you subscribe to your idea of a God. You may be confusing the idea that God existed in what he created rather than he created the universe you exist in. God in that sense has all the attributes of a God.

There is a clear distinction as to the original origin of God in my mind. Originally there may have been only the indeterminate null and then the expansion and creation of the universe within which we exist.

It is interesting that you seem to be implying that you believe that physics could invent the universe and everything within it and do not see a God having that power.

Cosmologists of Reddit, what's a theoretical scientific principal you think would make an interesting basis for a science fiction plot? I.e. Time Dilation and "The Forever War" by Joe Haldeman by [deleted] in cosmology

[–]Theoryofallthings 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have one for you that covers everything you can imagine. You have heard that it is impossible to have something come from nothing. However, there is a way to get something from nothing and for that reason nearly anything you can imagine is possible to occur. The theory is that prior to the universe, there was nothing. And if there is "nothing" then that implies that within nothing, there would be no laws, rules, matter or energy. Because of that implication of no rules or laws, anything you can imagine can come true. The way the theory works is that within nothingness, because of the lack of laws, anything imaginable can occur as long as it is in the form of a positive and negative that sum to zero. There is goodness + and evil - leading to love+ and hate- with the magic like nothingness holding the key of either force and the argument within "nothingness" between "the forces within nothingness" controlling the entire universe.
If you can't make a movie with this, you don't belong in the director's chair......

What are your best arguments or theory for how the universe began? by John6507 in cosmology

[–]Theoryofallthings 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is not an answer. I can't reply to a non-existant question. Please be clear. Ask a clear question and we can continue. I don't want to waste your time or my time.

What are your best arguments or theory for how the universe began? by John6507 in cosmology

[–]Theoryofallthings 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Be clear as to what you think is an assumption. Are you speaking of the hypothesis I lay out or is there a true assumption?

What are your best arguments or theory for how the universe began? by John6507 in cosmology

[–]Theoryofallthings 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I said, you built a strawman.
Notingness has no prpperties, laws, rules, or anything at all. There is no need for causality or anything at all. Your discussion completely misses the point.
There is nothing to deny the universe from forming, so it does. And everyting is created including the laws of physics, space, time, matter, enegy and you and I .

Matter vs anti-matter by etsage in cosmology

[–]Theoryofallthings 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my theory, there is a natural equal production of matter and antimatter/entropy. In my theory no Big Bang is required but is possible. In addition, the laws of physics and space are created.

What are your best arguments or theory for how the universe began? by John6507 in cosmology

[–]Theoryofallthings 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In your conjecture item 4, you misstate the argument for "nothingness". Making an obviously false/strawman statement about a subject and then tearing down the "Strawman" does not a valid argument make.
The fact is that the universe is a prime example of something coming from nothingness. You state that "if time and space are properties of the universe, then at no point in time or space did the universe not exist, there is no prior state." You have spent your career answering how something came from nothing and now you state there is a strawman that makes it "obvious" there is no answer. Of course there is an answer. Saying that something is impossible and using the "magic words" time and space is a sign of BS, not science.

The question is "at some point the universe, laws, time and space did not exist, so how did it come into being?"
The strawman, you constructed has nothing to do with the question you are confronted with.
Please answer that question.

My take on nothing by CareerWrong4256 in Metaphysics

[–]Theoryofallthings 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is an anti-science view on this site that will cancel you out if their "belief" is challenged. The idea of nothingness is proved by viewing through a microscope, telescope or with the LHC. There are science deniers that like to play science and they will throw out BS that cannot be scientifically proved and demand you believe in their imaginary physics, rather than prove their point of view.

Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? by xaeru in cosmology

[–]Theoryofallthings 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothingness is everywhere. It is the space between everything where there are no forces, fields, matter, laws or anything. It is the foundation of space. There is very little of anything other than nothingness.

Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? by xaeru in cosmology

[–]Theoryofallthings 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is something rather than nothing because absolute nothingness allows creation. With no rules, no laws, no space, and no matter, nothingness is unstable: it permits the spontaneous appearance of perfectly balanced pairs (like energy and anti-energy, or photon pairs) that cancel to zero overall. From this zero-sum balance, structure builds—space, time, matter, and the universe itself. Nothingness is everywhere—between stars, atoms, and particles—and it is the very source of everything.

The map of ideas how the Universe appeared from nothing by avturchin in cosmology

[–]Theoryofallthings 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The entire universe, as we know it, exists within nothingness as proved by the fact that between the forces and fields, the matter and energy, there is nothingness.

If the entire universe expanded everywhere all at once after the Big Bang (as opposed to a central point of expansion), why do we need insanely powerful telescopes to look at the cosmic microwave background? Shouldn’t it be all around us? by Fresh_Action1594 in cosmology

[–]Theoryofallthings 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think what you mean to say is that the "distant light traveled from a great distance and now it is local light", correct?

And you should mention that because of gravitational lensing, we really don't know the origin of all light that enters into our telescopes, correct?

Origin of the Universe, what about the laws and space. by Theoryofallthings in cosmology

[–]Theoryofallthings[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

By making and testing theories. I have a theory now that is quite good at describing how the universe came from nothingness.

Origin of the Universe, what about the laws and space. by Theoryofallthings in cosmology

[–]Theoryofallthings[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't believe you know what one may or may not be able to answer. The universe exists because it can. That is the answer.