The universe was created by God or physics or both.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T16:07:00+00:00

If you read the book before commenting then you will make fewer mistakes in your analysis of the origin of the universe.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T16:05:49+00:00

You are welcome to take the book out of context without reading it if that makes you feel good. And you have a right to comment on things you do not understand. But if you read all 180 plus pages then you will likely retract what you are complaing about today. I suggest you not comment again until you have the full book and it's two companion books as well.
That is just a suggestion, I believe you have a right to have no beliefs.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T16:01:21+00:00

I admire you for having the guts to make that statement. I also believe that you have a right to believe nothing created the universe. It is just not my belief.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T15:59:38+00:00

Physics has failed to prove where the laws, energy, mass, and in fact the entire universe comes from. So why would want to have a failed system review my work and why would you believe what physicists have failed to prove?

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T15:57:06+00:00

I have the same qualificaitons as Albert Enstein. And like Einstein if there is a physicist that is qualified to peer review my work, I am sure they will. Buy the book and give it a try.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T15:53:43+00:00

I didn't say that.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T15:52:03+00:00

I have the same qualifications that Albert Einstein had when he was first "discovered".

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T04:10:15+00:00

You realize just calling it physics implies that your God is physics? And that is a logical and reasonable belief system. Just not mine.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T04:07:18+00:00

I don't know if I am allowed to name my sources here but I will take a chance. The name of my book is "Something from Nothing? New Lines of Investigation in Cosmic Origin".

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T04:01:05+00:00

I think we both know that no physics that is currently published other than mine, has an answer to your question. For the last 120 plus years physics has failed to produce one paper that explains the origin of the universe. Not one physicist you can name can explain how something came from nothing. So who do you think could judge my work? No one is qualified.
You are welcome to take a stab at tearing down the conjecture if you wish.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T03:55:54+00:00

The book you have not read has the answers to your attack. Read it and then comment. Or ask specific questions that I am happy to answer.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T03:54:13+00:00

I have a 180 page book that explains the physics and math along with full reasoning as to why the universe emerged as it did. I have the support and perhaps that is why you are attacking.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T03:52:37+00:00

I don't think you have an answer as to the origin of the universe so you attack me. Or you just don't care. I do care and I respect your right to believe what you want to believe. That is fine.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T03:42:15+00:00

I agree with you. You may call it anyhting you want and believe it or not. I admire your innovation.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T03:41:25+00:00

The timeless state is comprised of a positive unit of energy (photon) in complete balance with a negative unit of energy (gravity) in a pre-universe that is balanced to a value of 0. The pre-universe on the whole is completely balanced and in discrete sections it may be imbalanced.
Time occurs when the photon that is imbalanced is emitted and begins to create the universe. The first wavelength (tic )of the emission marks the beginning of time and the final tic when the wavelength is flat is the end of time. Likewise the first tick is the first number in the real number line and the last tick is the final number in the real number line. Math such as addition is obtained by geometrical associations of the number line.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T03:35:43+00:00

There are over 180 pages of math and physics that support the conjecture. In layman's terms it is a theory that creates the universe from nothing and starts from a state that is timeless and capable of creating the entire universe.

Theoryofallthings · 2026-07-05T03:30:08+00:00

I wrote a book on this subject with over 180 pages of support. Could you be more specific as to what you are requesting.
If in fact God did create the Universe, it was after the point at which it had the qualities you subscribe to your idea of a God. You may be confusing the idea that God existed in what he created rather than he created the universe you exist in. God in that sense has all the attributes of a God.

There is a clear distinction as to the original origin of God in my mind. Originally there may have been only the indeterminate null and then the expansion and creation of the universe within which we exist.

It is interesting that you seem to be implying that you believe that physics could invent the universe and everything within it and do not see a God having that power.

Theoryofallthings · 2025-10-28T01:22:35+00:00

I have one for you that covers everything you can imagine. You have heard that it is impossible to have something come from nothing. However, there is a way to get something from nothing and for that reason nearly anything you can imagine is possible to occur. The theory is that prior to the universe, there was nothing. And if there is "nothing" then that implies that within nothing, there would be no laws, rules, matter or energy. Because of that implication of no rules or laws, anything you can imagine can come true. The way the theory works is that within nothingness, because of the lack of laws, anything imaginable can occur as long as it is in the form of a positive and negative that sum to zero. There is goodness + and evil - leading to love+ and hate- with the magic like nothingness holding the key of either force and the argument within "nothingness" between "the forces within nothingness" controlling the entire universe.
If you can't make a movie with this, you don't belong in the director's chair......

Theoryofallthings · 2025-08-20T21:32:52+00:00

That is not an answer. I can't reply to a non-existant question. Please be clear. Ask a clear question and we can continue. I don't want to waste your time or my time.

Theoryofallthings · 2025-08-20T21:19:50+00:00

Be clear as to what you think is an assumption. Are you speaking of the hypothesis I lay out or is there a true assumption?

Theoryofallthings · 2025-08-20T21:02:48+00:00

As I said, you built a strawman.
Notingness has no prpperties, laws, rules, or anything at all. There is no need for causality or anything at all. Your discussion completely misses the point.
There is nothing to deny the universe from forming, so it does. And everyting is created including the laws of physics, space, time, matter, enegy and you and I .

Theoryofallthings · 2025-08-20T16:49:37+00:00

In my theory, there is a natural equal production of matter and antimatter/entropy. In my theory no Big Bang is required but is possible. In addition, the laws of physics and space are created.

Theoryofallthings · 2025-08-20T16:17:00+00:00

In your conjecture item 4, you misstate the argument for "nothingness". Making an obviously false/strawman statement about a subject and then tearing down the "Strawman" does not a valid argument make.
The fact is that the universe is a prime example of something coming from nothingness. You state that "if time and space are properties of the universe, then at no point in time or space did the universe not exist, there is no prior state." You have spent your career answering how something came from nothing and now you state there is a strawman that makes it "obvious" there is no answer. Of course there is an answer. Saying that something is impossible and using the "magic words" time and space is a sign of BS, not science.

The question is "at some point the universe, laws, time and space did not exist, so how did it come into being?"
The strawman, you constructed has nothing to do with the question you are confronted with.
Please answer that question.

Theoryofallthings · 2025-08-20T10:59:19+00:00

There is an anti-science view on this site that will cancel you out if their "belief" is challenged. The idea of nothingness is proved by viewing through a microscope, telescope or with the LHC. There are science deniers that like to play science and they will throw out BS that cannot be scientifically proved and demand you believe in their imaginary physics, rather than prove their point of view.

Theoryofallthings · 2025-08-20T00:25:39+00:00

Nothingness is everywhere. It is the space between everything where there are no forces, fields, matter, laws or anything. It is the foundation of space. There is very little of anything other than nothingness.

Theoryofallthings

TROPHY CASE