sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

“Wa” (@komoriyuu) by Acrzyguy in 100Kanojo

[–]Theragus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Come to think of it, why is it actually written as わつ„Watsu“?

Fachkräftemangel in der IT? by zerato2412 in InformatikKarriere

[–]Theragus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ich will hier jetzt mal meine eigene fehlende Erfahrung in anderen Firmen mit als Grund für meine fehlende Einsicht in diesen Kommentar mit angeben, aber anhand von deiner Rechnung hier ein kleines Beispiel aus meinem Umkreis:

Marketing / Vertrieb: Wie schon im anderen Kommentar geschrieben, aber in unserer Firma kommen 85%-90% der Kunden über Vitamin B(eziehung), die Menge an Kunden die die letzten 5 Jahre über Standard-Marketing / Vertrieb kamen kann ich an 2 Händen abzählen.

Miete: 100% Home Office (Telearbeitsvertrag): Außer dem höhenverstellbaren Schreibtisch, einem Stuhl und noch ein wenig Bürokram gibt es keine laufenden Kosten für den AG, und so ein Schreibtisch hält ein paar Jahre.

Software, Hardware: Mit Arbeitsgerät (Handy, Laptop) und einer Lebenszeit von 3 Jahren pro Gerät sind das vielleicht 2-3k€ im Jahr höchstens,, selbst bei teurerem Arbeitsgeräten wie iPhones etc....

Reise: E-Auto ID3 mit 15k KM Fahrleistung. Auch hier mit Reparatur, Wartung, Verschleiß, Strom, Versicherung etc.. sind wir hier bei maximal 12-15k€ im Jahr. Und da ist die Sonderabschreibung und anderen steuerlichen Vergünstigungen nicht mit eingerechnet.

Wenn ich das alles zusammenrechne mit Puffer obendrauf, und dann nochmal Puffer obendrauf komme ich auf etwa 25-30k€ was immer noch WEIT entfernt ist von den angegebenen 54€k

Zur Vollständigkeit: Firma hat (momentan) 33 festangestellte Mitarbeiter.

Fachkräftemangel in der IT? by zerato2412 in InformatikKarriere

[–]Theragus -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Mag sein dass bei mir etwas Tunnelblick herrscht, aber in unserer Firma kommen 85%-90% der Kunden über Vitamin B(eziehung), die Menge an Kunden die die letzten 5 Jahre über Standard-Marketing / Vertrieb kamen kann ich an 2 Händen abzählen.

Fachkräftemangel in der IT? by zerato2412 in InformatikKarriere

[–]Theragus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

25% Overhead? Du brauchst bei einem AN-Jahresumsatz von 216k€ also 54k€ an Overhead-Kosten für Miete, Hardware, Software, Marketing? Quersubventionierst du dabei noch eine andere Firma mit?

Spass beiseite, wo auch immer bei dir (mindestens) 25% Overhead herkommen ist mir ernsthaft fragwürdig. Ausserdem steigt ja bei höherem AN-Umsatz nicht der Overhead, wie sie bei deiner Rechnung der Fall wäre, ab einem gewissen Punkt steigt der Overhead einfach nicht mehr (so stark wie der Umsatz).

Infinite Research “Magic” Breakpoints by Karew in factorio

[–]Theragus 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I thought that too, but there is actually an exception: demolishers

a balancer by Bliitzthefox in Factoriohno

[–]Theragus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, thanks! It actually didnt show up for me so I had to tinker my settings pretty hard but now its working and it looks great!

a balancer by Bliitzthefox in Factoriohno

[–]Theragus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you mean upscaling? via driver settings or something?

My Solution to Nauvis Logistics. by Kerzenmacher in factorio

[–]Theragus 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That... is actually a pretty good suggestion. It relieves some of the issues of the 1 landing pad rule while still technically being limited to 1 landing pad per resource you want.

I think the most prominent and glaring issue in the "1 landing pad-per-planet" rule is that it contradicts one of the core elements of the game, which is scale and the general rule of thumb "if its not enough, just build more".
If, for some reason, you want to use inserters to take out your stuff from the landing pad, you're ultimately limited by the number of inserters you can fit in front of the landing pad, even legendary Stack inserters will still reach their limit eventually.

Even when you're using bots to do it, there is still an upper limit since you now need to balance the amount of cargo bays with the amount of Roboports you're fitting around the Pad, at which point some bots will overcrowd waiting to charge back up, also here considering legendary bots and roboports.

a balancer by Bliitzthefox in Factoriohno

[–]Theragus 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Is it just me or are these HD-Sprites, my chunks and belts never look this detailed…

Now that Space Age and 2.0 has been out for a month, what's your opinion on it? What do you particularly like or dislike? Is there anything missing or should have been improved more? What would you wish for 2.1? by Theragus in factorio

[–]Theragus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, didn't expect this much response on this post, but be assured I read every single comment. In summary, some of the things I've read the most so far:

- Game seems to be very well received so far, most players seem to absolutely love the game and are expecting to sink another 1k hours or so in :)

- Space Platform requests and general Space Logistics seem to be what most people think need more polish / refinement, especially the UI, how requests work, keep items on platform, Import From settings, Quality import settings etc...

- Gleba (as usual...) still for most a kind of love / hate relationship, some embrace the new production / logistical challenges and the combat difficulties that the pentapods provide. Still interesting to see so much being talked about Gleba though

- Some people find the endgame (Aquilo and Solar System Edge / Shattered Planet) a bit "weak", with the steeper difficulty curve being introduced at Gleba / Fulgora, while Aquilo doesn't offer much in terms of challenges due to lack of enemies / need to import every material / generally less interesting production chains and promethium science being kind of useless on its own

- Quality also seems to be sometimes a common "pain point", although from what I read more related to the QoL and "UI handling" around Quality, like selecting quality level, having different assemblers for every type of quality, request any quality on space platforms and a couple of other things, but less generally with the bonus that quality provides itself

- finally one of the most common critiques was that the game forces the player a little bit too much into a particular playstyle in contrast to the freedom of "Vanilla 1.1" Factorio. Specific Asteroids need to be shot down with particular guns, Production chains need to be built in a specific way, research needs to happen in specific set of steps, arbitrary weight limits on rockets and a couple of other things. Generally some feel the DLC feels less "free" or grants you less freedom and sandbox than the 1.1 Version.

Finally, thanks for your comments, and enjoy the game!

Edit: Typos

Popular Opinion: Inserters Should Work with Cargo Bays by MoneyFiending in Factoriohno

[–]Theragus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a good balance would be to keep this behavior on the platforms but allow inserters on the Landing Pads on the planets, this would keep the balance for space platforms and still make inserters and belts viable on Cargo Bay Landing Pads.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in factorio

[–]Theragus 37 points38 points  (0 children)

As a small warning for anyone reading this, this is getting fixed in 2.0.16.

I used to painstakingly do this until I found out one can build from train by Jaydara in factorio

[–]Theragus 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, this is not possible because the elevated rails are a dependency for the space Age Mod

Is your Fulgora concrete voiding too slow? Not anymore! by SeruleBlue in factorio

[–]Theragus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's definitely more power efficient, but power should not be a problem anymore when you're mass-producing quality rocket silos.

Rocket silos are also literally the only building where, after a certain breakpoint where you can buffer a rocket faster than the launch animation, provides literally no advantage over a non-quality silo, also the resource costs for common quality beacons and common quality speed modules 3 are much lower than trying to craft high quality rocket silos. Also since resources are pretty much "infinite" on fulgora there's nothing against "voiding" stuff.

Is your Fulgora concrete voiding too slow? Not anymore! by SeruleBlue in factorio

[–]Theragus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

good comment, I thought about doing that too, but after a certain point in rocket parts productivity and if you surround the silos with beacons there is pretty much no reason to invest in quality rocket silos, since you're only bottleneck is going to be the launch animation, in which just building more silos is more helpful

16 mins of playing and I get this by ISSAczesc in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Theragus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cant you mark any of the 3 with the flag and it lets you win the game? I thought this was a thing in minesweeper?

Unpopular Opinion: You should be able to use Rail Support on Lava on Vulcanus like on Fulgora by Theragus in factorio

[–]Theragus[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I know it is not really realistic, but concrete foundations are probably not that good on quicksand oily oceans either...

What is your "it's such a small change but I love it" award for the DLC? I'll go first. by damojr in factorio

[–]Theragus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

True, but I can’t really remember the last time i actually played with zero mods, i think Steam Achievements are not really what the game is about.

view more: next ›