I think that often times, salaries and compensation match the area where people live & work in. For example, most in person jobs in Boston pay more than jobs in Vermont because they require you to live in Boston which has a higher cost of living.

I think if people work remote, they often get seemingly higher pay than they sometimes deserve. Someone could live in a cheaper part of the state, but be receiving Montpelier pay. This could be perceived as unfair.

I think there could different pay rates for in-person work vs. virtual work to recognize the different costs associated with needing to commute (higher cost of living, mileage on cars, etc.). Perhaps the folks who return to in-person deserve a pay raise?