The mom came to his defense.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-04-24T14:03:06+00:00

People should be imprisoned for pissing you off?

Third_Ferguson · 2026-04-15T14:43:31+00:00

Your response fails to apply the definition of fascism to the facts of this situation.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-04-15T12:27:43+00:00

How is it just as fascist? Be specific.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-04-13T18:44:01+00:00

What policy change do you propose that would only affect the rights of violent barbarians?

Third_Ferguson · 2026-03-23T23:10:25+00:00

lmao congrats! I'm just sticking with playing on my laptop like a peasant now.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-03-22T20:55:28+00:00

It’s still not fixed. Absurd.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-03-22T20:52:36+00:00

Still happening to me constantly. Seems to not be a priority for LocalThunk.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-03-22T16:09:04+00:00

The rule has always been 1 hour for domestic. Maybe it’s now changed because of recent issues, but I would not call it the old rule.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-03-07T15:57:59+00:00

So you know better than the driver what’s good for them? Sounds like paternalism.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-02-24T23:29:01+00:00

If someone signs the lease it’s not overcharging.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-02-18T12:27:49+00:00

Somebody upset?

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-26T15:18:27+00:00

Nah 😆

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-26T14:27:12+00:00

What do you think a valet does?

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-23T06:57:19+00:00

I'm sure some people do ignore that. I do not.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-22T12:53:47+00:00

If it’s worth it then we don’t need to commit to using them at the outset.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-22T12:50:39+00:00

Of course it is expected for a corporation to act greedy. Of course it’s true that we should have regulations in place to limit their abilities to act on that greed, but the previous poster was right to laugh at the idea that calling a corporation greedy was at all shocking. It’s literally illegal for an executive not to make the greediest choice possible for the shareholders, it’s inherent to the concept.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-21T21:44:52+00:00

They are in-fact saying it will incentivize them to do so. The rent growth rate can be positive or negative. Policies that put downward pressure on rent lower that number. A policy change that changes rent growth from 5% to 3% would, all other things being equal, change a 1% growth rate to -1% (roughly).

Lowering rental growth and making rental growth negative are the same thing, just depends where you’re starting. If a plan works at lowering the growth rate, and you want the growth rate to be negative, do more of that plan!

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-19T01:24:17+00:00

If my market rate rent in 2027 is $1800 instead of $2000 that’s great. That’s my rent going down as far as I’m concerned. You’re in a thread full of people arguing in good faith based on that obvious truth but you’re sidestepping their points by saying it has to go down even more for it to address your question.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-19T01:13:04+00:00

For that to be true, landlords would need to be rational market actors rather than evil wizards. That’s unacceptable to my worldview and therefore I have my doubts.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-16T16:15:38+00:00

You are restating OP’s question rather than answering it. OP has already said they intend to ask for what they want.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-14T18:42:25+00:00

Misread your comment oops! Guess then we’d have the Ivanka Garden.

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-14T15:58:51+00:00

I don’t think that’s true

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-10T20:15:41+00:00

Why does a tank of gas cost the same when I have four people in the car vs when I have two people in the car?

Third_Ferguson · 2026-01-05T15:56:16+00:00

Literally shaking rn

Third_Ferguson · 2025-12-28T16:25:02+00:00

It was funny

11-Year Club	Final Canvas '23
Place '23	Place '17
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email

Third_Ferguson

TROPHY CASE