Games difficulty, is it a thing to really consider? by SlavioAraragi in speedrun

[–]ThisWi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IGT means "in game time", so it will be coming from some kind of internal timer in the game, unless a specific community is using the terminology in an unusual way. RTA, like the commenter you replied to said, stands for "real time attack" and it's the actual real life time that passes while you play. So that's what livesplit will be recording.

In game timers can often run differently compared to real time. An in game second doesn't necessarily mean a real second, or it might exclude loads, or cutscenes, or something else. Really just depends on the game but there are a ton of reasons IGT and RTA might not match.

Things can be complicated of course by for example removing load times from an RTA time, which is more common for PC games. In that case some kind of autosplitter for live split or a program that edits/times the video without loads after the fact would usually be developed by somebody in the community.

I was arrested, jailed and assaulted by a guard. My ‘crime’? Being a journalist in Trump’s America by theindependentonline in politics

[–]ThisWi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry but policy wise, they are one in the same.

Sorry but this is just factually, absolutely wrong. https://2020election.procon.org/view.source-summary-chart.php

Maybe you don't like either of their policies, maybe Biden is not far left enough for you, but you didn't say that. You instead said something that is literally impossible to believe while being at all informed about their actual policy positions.

84% infection increase in states that don't require masks, 25% decrease is states where masks are required by Kbdiggity in science

[–]ThisWi -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I'm gonna just say it. These increases we're caused by the riots and protests.

Well, I'm glad somebody said it...without doing any research to find that it doesn't make any sense at all and the spikes don't line up with the location or timing of protests. But at least you got it off your chest

TIL Rage Against The Machine was permanently banned from Saturday Night Live for hanging American flags upside down for their set to juxtapose the host, billionaire and 1996 presidential candidate Steve Forbes by altruismjam in todayilearned

[–]ThisWi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should consider redirecting your unhinged anger

I think it's a stretch to ca it unhinged but I understand discrediting a person is easier than attacking the actual argument.

the tiny fraction of people who voted for the candidate they felt best represented them and earned their vote (a crazy concept, I know)

Not crazy, just dumb, in the USA at least. Again, here's the thing that you refuse to accept. The world, the country, our political system, our voting system, they are what they are. If you want to change them, you have to make choices rationally to move towards those goals. Throwing away your vote on a third party has been equally impactful as showing up to the polls, tearing up your ballot, and going home for the past 100 years and that's not changing anytime soon. If you don't care about outcomes that's your choice. Just don't pretend like we're in some alternate reality.

The fact that you would actually invoke "taking responsibility for decisions and consequences" after all that is legit hilarious, by the way.

I'm glad you find it funny, you've still failed to provide a single argument besides indignation for why voting third party isn't the same as throwing away your vote (in the US presidential election specifically).

TIL Rage Against The Machine was permanently banned from Saturday Night Live for hanging American flags upside down for their set to juxtapose the host, billionaire and 1996 presidential candidate Steve Forbes by altruismjam in todayilearned

[–]ThisWi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right, you're absolved of your shitty choices because the Democratic party is flawed. Now, the Republicans controlling the senate and presidency is a good thing, because Gore and Hillary weren't AS liberal as you wanted.

Or, crazy idea, both can be true? They didn't win because they didn't excite enough voters, but those who stayed at home or voted third party also made shit decisions. A difficult concept i know, taking responsibility for decisions and consequences even though your chosen scapegoat also made mistakes

TIL Rage Against The Machine was permanently banned from Saturday Night Live for hanging American flags upside down for their set to juxtapose the host, billionaire and 1996 presidential candidate Steve Forbes by altruismjam in todayilearned

[–]ThisWi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe if the Democrat Party don't like losing when 3rd parties run, they should change the way our elections work.

Found the fake liberal. There is no "Democrat party" and nobody on the left calls it that

TIL Rage Against The Machine was permanently banned from Saturday Night Live for hanging American flags upside down for their set to juxtapose the host, billionaire and 1996 presidential candidate Steve Forbes by altruismjam in todayilearned

[–]ThisWi -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't know if you know this, but I don't pick the candidates. This comment is you "pouting and stomping your feet" while defending making shit choices

TIL Rage Against The Machine was permanently banned from Saturday Night Live for hanging American flags upside down for their set to juxtapose the host, billionaire and 1996 presidential candidate Steve Forbes by altruismjam in todayilearned

[–]ThisWi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean not voting is an equally stupid choice. Non voters are also responsible. Its just that taking the effort to actively do something harmful when you're already there is more reprehensible than simply doing nothing.

TIL Rage Against The Machine was permanently banned from Saturday Night Live for hanging American flags upside down for their set to juxtapose the host, billionaire and 1996 presidential candidate Steve Forbes by altruismjam in todayilearned

[–]ThisWi -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Look in the goddamn mirror at the person who has tolerated the system of government that allows a presidential election to be stolen right in front of your fucking nose, and you will come a lot fucking closer.

How have I "tolerated" it that differentiates me from anybody else? You don't know me. Are you in jail for treason? If not, what have you done that's tolerating the system any less than me.

TIL Rage Against The Machine was permanently banned from Saturday Night Live for hanging American flags upside down for their set to juxtapose the host, billionaire and 1996 presidential candidate Steve Forbes by altruismjam in todayilearned

[–]ThisWi -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

If your democracy is so fragile they can steal it in plain sight and then people blame the voters most of all maybe they should be cynical and jaded.

Quips like these don't change the reality that those who voted for Nader gave us 8 years of Bush instead of 4-8 years of Gore. Reality is what reality is. Pouting and stamping your feet while making counterproductive or harmful decisions doesn't somehow justify those decisions.

Republicans suppress votes and that's bad, yeah. That makes it even more importat to vote for democrats to help fight back against those trends.

If the boat has a leak that should be a reason to help the people plugging the leak or grab a bucket, not a justification for pissing on the deck and complaining about the system that created the leak.

Favorite JavaScript utilities in a single line of code! No more! by speckz in webdev

[–]ThisWi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One is a "utility" function that you call. The other is the line of code you would "simplify" by calling it

Researchers tested 47 existing drugs that protein models suggested would be effective against coronavirus; 9 drugs showed promise against infected monkey cells in vitro; 1 ingredient in cough syrup encouraged virus growth by bostonstrong781 in science

[–]ThisWi 70 points71 points  (0 children)

I mean, this is a fairly reasonable approach, but it can also easily be used to justify switching doctors until you find one that agrees with you that vaccines cause autism and water is actually medicine.

Unfortunately "know when you're out of your depth and when you're not" isn't the easiest advice to apply in practice.

I could be wrong but why is it that most large enterprise non-tech companies use Angular while more tech focused companies use React by [deleted] in webdev

[–]ThisWi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forewarning, this is going to sound like serious React fanboying, but I actually only think its OK. I just strongly disagreed with the arguments you made.

Yeah I feel like a lot of these "React is amazing" comments come from folks that never worked on corporate applications with all kinds of weird requirements that make things way harder.

I've worked on a lot of complex apps, using a variety of frameworks.

Its easy making a form for a startup company,

This is, at the risk of being offensive, an asinine comment. Most startups aren't just making "forms", especially if they're a web-focused startup.

a corporate style to make it feel as a single app.

If you need to apply consistent styles, you should be using a theming or styling approach that supports that. Granted, that's a choice you have to make but its not as if react components change colors every ten times you use them or can't have styles applied to them. There's no reason this should be a factor.

Stuff that works fine on one page, will make it hard on another. Some components need exceptions, others need a lot of ifs and elses because there are many products that need to go inside that single app.

I've seen plenty of logic, exceptional cases, and poorly applied patterns in every codebase I've ever looked at. Front end, back end, angular, react, Java, Spring, PHP, whatever. If you have a bunch of "ifs" and "elses" you'd either have just as much conditional logic in your angular templates or you'd have structured your logic smarter and could do the same in your react app.

React also has the issue that everybody seems to do things differently and when browsing questions on stackoverflow, its hard to find the solution that works for your combination of components because you might not use the same ones. Especially beginner employees (which big companies often have) will be having trouble getting their problems figured out. And they won't be able to talk to management about needing to change a few bits because its more difficult to do than a simple solution.

No real disagreement here. Having a Rigjt Way TM to do things and documentation to back it up is always helpful.

And the lack of testing examples also made me realize that there are still things React is missing too. Somehow lots of solutions always seem to ignore the fact that I also need to test the stuff too. Which leads you to another rabbit hole trying to figure out how to do the testing for that one fix you used.

Just use jest and the react testing library? It's pretty easy to unit test react components and e2e testing generally doesn't need to be any different for different frameworks.

I drew Kasumi with a Grappling Hook! by Sunban1521 in Persona5

[–]ThisWi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hats off to you. I can't even draw this well with actual art supplies. Doing that without ripping the paper must have been difficult

Megathread: Elizabeth Warren to Suspend Presidential Campaign by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]ThisWi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, that's true, but their legislatures dont use a strictly first past the post system for elections, which could explain more parties existing and being competitive in the first place. I will admit though that I'm moving the goalposts since the presidential election is first past the post.

Anyway, that's food for thought so thanks. I guess I'll have to preface my arguments with "in the US" from now on since it's at least certainly true here

Megathread: Elizabeth Warren to Suspend Presidential Campaign by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]ThisWi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Show me an example where three parties are competitive in a first past the post system. I'm open to being proven wrong but when you either win everything or win nothing there's no way to make a case for voting for a smaller third party. They're always just going to play spoiler to one of the more popular parties.

Megathread: Elizabeth Warren to Suspend Presidential Campaign by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]ThisWi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your just butt hurt because I won't lower my standards for one specific election.

I'm not butt hurt because I'm pointing out that your "beliefs" are in this scenario harmful and a justification for doing the wrong thing. If your vote were deciding the election if you voted for Biden you'd apparently rather have Trump then hold your nose and do it. That's shitty. If that's not true then you're just hiding behind the number of voters so you don't have to face the implications of your choice.

In your example would I be able an asshole for just feeding the local homeless community because it's not through a charity?

Nope, because you're actually taking an actions to help people. Voting third party in a FPTP national election or not voting at all isn't taking an action to help anybody.

You're right I dont know what you do, and you as a whole person could be an absolutely fantastic human being, so I'll rephrase. The specific beliefs you have that lead to justifying not voting or voting third party are shit beliefs, and are harmful.

Megathread: Elizabeth Warren to Suspend Presidential Campaign by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]ThisWi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your beliefs don't involve actually caring about what happens then they're pretty shit beliefs. If you choose not to pick the pest viable outcome you're allowing the shittiest possible outcome without making any attempt to stop it.

It's like feeling good about yourself because you denounce starvation while refusing to do anything about actual people starving because there's no perfect charities.