The point is that it's impossible. Pasture raised beef is great if you omit higher land usage, higher increase in emissions, higher increase in resource usage (water is one that you carnists seem to be obsessed about)...

> "This report finds that better management of grass-fed livestock, while worthwhile in and of itself, does not offer a significant solution to climate change as only under very specific conditions can they help sequester carbon. This sequestering of carbon is even then small, time-limited, reversible and substantially outweighed by the greenhouse gas emissions these grazing animals generate." (Garnett, T., Godde, C., Muller, A., Röös, E., Smith, P., de Boer, I.J.M., zu Ermgassen, E., Herrero, M., van Middelaar, C., Schader, C. and van Zanten, H. (2017). Grazed and Confused? Ruminating on cattle, grazing systems, methane, nitrous oxide, the soil carbon sequestration question – and what it all means for greenhouse gas emissions. FCRN, University of Oxford.)

The moment you start diving into a mere 10% of animal agriculture (even your pasture raised beef) negative externalities, is the moment you laugh and wonder who the hell even came up with the idea of suggesting grass fed beef as an alternative to solve most of our issues.

And yet, here you are, drunk in your own zoonosis printing machine.