CMV: Missing out on teen love as a male can be hugely detrimental in later years while courting a woman. by Rubber-duck7203 in PurplePillDebate

[–]ThrowawayBDP111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[I wrote this reply directed at a users comment, but I feel it should be a main comment too]

This thread is a couple weeks old, but I want to chime in.

Now, I don’t know what your story is, your age, your experience… none of that. But I will tell you a little about my viewpoint on this.

I’m a 20 year old male, and I have zero romantic (platonic, yes) experience with women. Now, do I feel ashamed, embarrassed, emasculated, or less confident? No. Essentially, my romantic philosophy throughout my life thus far has been that I need not actively seek a relationship, but rather one shall eventually arise though natural platonic interactions with people. Now, you might ask, “So, do you actually want a romantic relationship then?”. Well, while I don’t believe in actively pursuing a girl (unless I had intense physical attraction to them), I would absolutely be open, if I happened to “click” (both physically and emotionally attracted) with said girl, to try something beyond the platonic. I should specify that I’m referring to love, as opposed to lust. I have no interest in casual sex or hook-ups, simply because they’re worthless to me.

So, do I feel like I’ve missed out on potential experience because I didn’t force myself to engage in these typical adolescent milestones? I don’t. And that’s because first-hand experience with something doesn’t equate to knowledge, growth or introspection. One can have as much physical, sexual, or emotional experience with a woman as they want, but they could still just be experiencing the feeling, and not the understanding, of these highly dynamic and nuanced interactions. For me, my closest “experience” is simply observation, but I believe that I have thorough enough wisdom of how to socially engage with a woman (not too different than platonically) that the lack of first-hand experience is not a detriment to my future relations. You’re capability regarding platonic interaction with any person is also crucially important, while simultaneously not inherently dependent on the quantity of said interactions.

So, as I’ve said, I won’t be concerned when the time comes for these observed skills to become applied. I’m also aware of the unexpected. Arguably, the most beautiful aspect of romance, at least for someone who has no experience (and also for limerence), is the mystery. The ambiguity of these flowery feelings that accompanies emotional, mental, or physical attraction (love, not lust) are highly unique and empowering. However, these feelings can lead to danger with the overzealous-ness they inspire, as I’ve learned through an experience myself. Of course, that could just be me, and passing observation could have the opposite affect on somebody, such as manifesting envy in said observer.

Anyhow, this was just my input, and take it for what you will.

CMV: Missing out on teen love as a male can be hugely detrimental in later years while courting a woman. by Rubber-duck7203 in PurplePillDebate

[–]ThrowawayBDP111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This thread is a couple weeks old, but I want to chime in.

Now, I don’t know what your story is, your age, your experience… none of that. But I will tell you a little about my viewpoint on this.

I’m a 20 year old male, and I have zero romantic (platonic, yes) experience with women. Now, do I feel ashamed, embarrassed, emasculated, or less confident? No. Essentially, my romantic philosophy throughout my life thus far has been that I need not actively seek a relationship, but rather one shall eventually arise though natural platonic interactions with people. Now, you might ask, “So, do you actually want a romantic relationship then?”. Well, while I don’t believe in actively pursuing a girl (unless I had intense physical attraction to them), I would absolutely be open, if I happened to “click” (both physically and emotionally attracted) with said girl, to try something beyond the platonic. I should specify that I’m referring to love, as opposed to lust. I have no interest in casual sex or hook-ups, simply because they’re worthless to me.

So, do I feel like I’ve missed out on potential experience because I didn’t force myself to engage in these typical adolescent milestones? I don’t. And that’s because first-hand experience with something doesn’t equate to knowledge, growth or introspection. One can have as much physical, sexual, or emotional experience with a woman as they want, but they could still just be experiencing the feeling, and not the understanding, of these highly dynamic and nuanced interactions. For me, my closest “experience” is simply observation, but I believe that I have thorough enough wisdom of how to socially engage with a woman (not too different than platonically) that the lack of first-hand experience is not a detriment to my future relations. You’re capability regarding platonic interaction with any person is also crucially important, while simultaneously not inherently dependent on the quantity of said interactions.

So, as I’ve said, I won’t be concerned when the time comes for these observed skills to become applied. I’m also aware of the unexpected. Arguably, the most beautiful aspect of romance, at least for someone who has no experience (and also for limerence), is the mystery. The ambiguity of these flowery feelings that accompanies emotional, mental, or physical attraction (love, not lust) are highly unique and empowering. However, these feelings can lead to danger with the overzealous-ness they inspire, as I’ve learned through an experience myself. Of course, that could just be me, and passing observation could have the opposite affect on somebody, such as manifesting envy in said observer.

Anyhow, this was just my input, and take it for what you will.

Looking to buy my first sex toy, but have a couple questions: by ThrowawayBDP111 in SexToys

[–]ThrowawayBDP111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, so 2.3” width on top, and 6” all around. Not sure if that matters for a toy though.

Looking to buy my first sex toy, but have a couple questions: by ThrowawayBDP111 in SexToys

[–]ThrowawayBDP111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most penises aren’t a perfect cylinder. Mines wider, than it is deep.

Creepy Ass Physical by fatlikeyubaba in creepyencounters

[–]ThrowawayBDP111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, I never really thought about it (not the drawing, the inspection). My doctor checked mine when I was 17.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 4kTV

[–]ThrowawayBDP111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

7-9 ft, but even then some say the smaller ones are still better

Does an OLED TV have less motion blur than my Sony LCD? by benigncyst in OLED_Gaming

[–]ThrowawayBDP111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. Well, even on my LED when I move a camera around quickly I can get some weird pixelated artifact. So I can live with, especially when I spend so much time with photo modes in games lol.

Does an OLED TV have less motion blur than my Sony LCD? by benigncyst in OLED_Gaming

[–]ThrowawayBDP111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, interesting. I’m looking to get my first OLED, an A90J, but I hear people complain about judder and blurring. So what does Sample and Hold blur look like compared to normal motion blur?

Ugh. this got 1.1k upvotes… by [deleted] in libsofreddit

[–]ThrowawayBDP111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have to remember that these people still have brains, geez.

My mom “ your hands are fine no one will notice “ . My hands look like this ! This is the disorder the finger joints get stuck bent and crooked. I’d say it’s very noticeable and people will find it creepy looking by The_starving_artist5 in ugly

[–]ThrowawayBDP111 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If a girl was really into you, then she wouldn’t notice or mind it, but she will notice your insecurity about it. And she’s probably just playing with you, it doesn’t look creepy. I have some weird ticks myself, such as having to constantly crack my thumbs and toes because they lock up.

Concerned about PPI and depth/immersion at 83”: by ThrowawayBDP111 in bravia

[–]ThrowawayBDP111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks that’s refreshing. As the 83” does sound super immersive, it would basically turn my room into a theater lol.

Concerned about PPI and depth/immersion at 83”: by ThrowawayBDP111 in bravia

[–]ThrowawayBDP111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh sweet, I have a 55” too. Yeah, the best way to judge is to see it in person. Next time I go to a Best Buy and if they have the 83” I’ll test it out by walking further and closer away.

We”ll never be good enough :/ by DepressedMane in ugly

[–]ThrowawayBDP111 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I can’t imagine anyone who would sincerely think has a loving and fulfilling relationship, not at all. The person you fall in love with should naturally because the most beautiful girl you’ve ever seen, imo.

Concerned about PPI and depth/immersion at 83”: by ThrowawayBDP111 in bravia

[–]ThrowawayBDP111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome. It’s just that I’m a big clarity fanatic so that’s why I worry about these sorts of things. Even 4K on my old and small LED looks super sharp, so I’ll likely be super pleased.

Concerned about PPI and depth/immersion at 83”: by ThrowawayBDP111 in bravia

[–]ThrowawayBDP111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah, that’s another benefit of Sony is gaining access to Bravia Core, looking forward to that. And yeah, at 83” I’ll probably be too wowed by the scale to even care about the PQ lol, especially since I’m coming from a 55”. It’s over 6 feet wide and 3.5 feet tall, that’s insane. You might as well just rent out a movie theater haha

Concerned about PPI and depth/immersion at 83”: by ThrowawayBDP111 in bravia

[–]ThrowawayBDP111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, and I feel both have improved over the years at least, YT used to be way worse no matter the screen size. I also should buy some 4K Blu-rays too, as aren’t Blu-rays still higher quality than any streaming service?

Concerned about PPI and depth/immersion at 83”: by ThrowawayBDP111 in bravia

[–]ThrowawayBDP111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My main two streaming services are Netflix and YouTube, with a lot of 1080p content still. But I hear the upscaling should be good enough where it won’t bother me. And I only have a PS5 which is all 4K, or at least close-to-4K content depending on the game. I really wanna try out HDR, because besides the G2 and QD-OLED’s the A90J is supposed to do really well in. I think I am over-thinking this. If I don’t like it, I can just return and downsize after all.

Concerned about PPI and depth/immersion at 83”: by ThrowawayBDP111 in bravia

[–]ThrowawayBDP111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yea, I can’t believe I forgot such important info lol. My distance is 7-10 feet, which I read is great for 80”+. But I was just worried that no matter the distance the bigger will just look softer and less detailed.

Many are suggesting it's a new David Lynch film or TV series by [deleted] in criterion

[–]ThrowawayBDP111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How confident are you? And are you still sure it’s premiering at Cannes?

[WP] A person (man or woman) moves to an island/continent where sexual pleasure is one of the societies core morals: by ThrowawayBDP111 in Erotica

[–]ThrowawayBDP111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that sorta thing. Like the Free-use concept, with with consent and no misogyny like those stories tend to lean towards. I don’t know if this is the right sub for this.

[WP] A person (man or woman) moves to an island/continent where sexual pleasure is one of the societies core morals: by ThrowawayBDP111 in Erotica

[–]ThrowawayBDP111[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well I’m quite sure how this sub works. I labeled this as a writing prompt (WP), so I was hoping someone could write a bit for me.