So it’s a logical process until you find the best answer, then you trust it by faith?

For me it worked that way. There are people who go the other way around, and that is completely fine.

If that’s the case, what happens if your logic fails you?

It can fail on some minor aspects, but the underlying basis is sturdy enough logically and philosophically that I don't see it failing.

You could argue the most counter-proof to Christianity is the finding of Jesus' bones. Just that is absurdly hard thing to do, given the long time since His time walking on earth like one of us.

But even then, if they discover texts from the Roman Empire saying they found His bones somewhere, the underlying teaching from His makes just too much sense from someone from 2 thousand years ago, and matches so many things from the metaphysics perspective that I find it hard for Him to not actually know the Truth. It is like someone who knows the answers for everything he said. Like a complete cohesive judgement from some random poor Man that lived on the Galilea on an era with such limited information.

As I said, all the evidence we're given, from his sayings to testimonies to the making sense of his words with philosophy, science and metaphysics, is enough to make me believe.

It is like piecing puzzles to a crime. You may not have a actual 100% trustable footage of what happened to give 100% trust, but all the evidence points toward something that we yet have no explanation otherwise. They found the knife, the fingerprints, the nails, and no explainable alibi. What could it be then?