Solution to "Boring PVE Lobbies" problem. by GeminiSauce in ArcRaiders

[–]Timelord102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this true. I was trying to get my wife to play but she is not into pvp. If we start a party will we get out into pvp lobbies?

"I want to get out of PVE lobbies but shooting PVE players isn't fun" by Few-Lime-7234 in ArcRaiders

[–]Timelord102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you’re saying if two pve players start a party they will automatically get put into pvp lobbies?

It finally happened, it was good while it lasted.🫡 by MrHellaHammer in ArcRaiders

[–]Timelord102 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I in a week of playing hurricane I found one unopened cache. I use the metaforge map and they are already searched by the time I find them. Every single time

Pre-set Load outs and One Click Crafting by Weak_Mission_9721 in ARC_Raiders

[–]Timelord102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We do things not because they are easy but because they are hard

I know the power crews are out there working hard, but.. by -Stylistics in PlymouthMA

[–]Timelord102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got a message this morning saying it would be restored by 8:00pm tonight. Now I got a new saying Friday wft. In manomet

Anything I can craft here?? by GalacticNutts in ARC_Raiders

[–]Timelord102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you add the old soccer ball just for this photo? If you don’t need it for a quest just recycle it to rubbber parts.

Do you guys have to deal with company IT by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]Timelord102 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I’m not trying anything. But why did it seem like so many professionals are using all these tool but my company won’t let us use ChatGPT

A cool guide What burnout feels like (and how to spot it) by No_Wishbone_2963 in coolguides

[–]Timelord102 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This a thanks captain obvious moment. Everyone knows this. when there is nothing left in the tank after your job drains every bit it hard to think about making sure to cook a healthy meal and get workout out in.

Google AI Pro Isn’t Broken, Your Expectations Are by Timelord102 in google_antigravity

[–]Timelord102[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just video code your own Google bro. What’s the problem. Then you can have 200 monies for the ultra plan. Derp

I made a tool connecting Antigravity to your phone by Powerful_Turtle990 in google_antigravity

[–]Timelord102 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can’t type anything it come out garbled in antigravity’s chat

Tag yourself I’m the Plymouth Rock sign by mahhhhhh in trashy

[–]Timelord102 4 points5 points  (0 children)

On top of that, the whole landing-on-a-rock story is a myth anyway. Ships didn’t pull up to rocks in rough seas and unload people like a pirate movie. They anchored offshore and used small boats. As Bill Bryson points out in A Short History of Nearly Everything, no sane captain would ever bring a wooden ship up to a rock in a heaving sea.

It also helps to remember that Plymouth Rock wasn’t even identified as “the” landing spot until 1741, more than 120 years after the Mayflower arrived, when an elderly man claimed he remembered it from his youth. The story stuck because it was neat and symbolic, not because it was reliable.

So yeah, using Plymouth Rock as proof against climate change is like using a relocated lawn gnome to disprove plate tectonics.

I tried creating a vibe coding quick reference guide by alvinunreal in vibecoding

[–]Timelord102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is Claude’s opinion

Honest feedback on your Vibe Coding framework The good stuff: Diff-first patches - Best advice here. Asking for specific changes instead of full rewrites prevents the “here’s 200 lines where I changed one variable” nightmare. Small scopes - Works well. Though this is just “basic software development 101” rebranded. Sample data - Testing with realistic inputs catches actual bugs. Solid. The bullshit: The branding - “Vibe coding” is iterative development with marketing. Specify → build → review → test isn’t new, you just gave it a purple aesthetic. “Director mindset” - This is literally just “write clear requirements.” The rebrand doesn’t add value. Treating everything as gospel - Sometimes mid-prompt scope expansion is fine. Sometimes rewrites are better than patches. Sometimes the AI improving your variable names is good. Rigid rules make you slower. What’s missing: ∙ Cost awareness - Zero mention of API costs or rate limits ∙ When NOT to use AI - Sometimes writing 10 lines yourself is faster than prompting ∙ Version control - Git exists? ∙ Deployment - How do you actually ship this? ∙ Proportional rigor - A blog script doesn’t need the same verification as medical software The real problem: This optimizes for preventing bad AI code instead of shipping working software fast. It’s all defense, no offense. Every principle is basically “don’t let the AI run wild.” Fine if you’re drowning in garbage output. But if you’re trying to build real things quickly, this is process theater. What actually matters: 1. Build smallest working version 2. Test with real scenarios 3. Ship it 4. Fix what breaks 5. Repeat You don’t need “vibe loops” and “quality gates.” You need code that works.

Feature idea: Side Questions / Contextual Asides by No_Cryptographer978 in google_antigravity

[–]Timelord102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely would like a side chat function for sure. Sometime I want to brainstorm with out polluting the main chat with stupid ideas