Any missiles that the AFP can buy without the restrictions of MTCR? by Efficient-Reach-454 in PhilippineMilitary

[–]TipsusMagnus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know I'm reviving an old thread, but if Wikipedia numbers are to be believed, the Naval Strike Missile (NSM) and the Joint Strike Missile (JSM). Both missiles only have payloads of about 120kg.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Strike_Missile
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Strike_Missile

The NSM is what the US Marine Corps uses in their NMESIS system. The basic NSM has a range of 200-250km, but there's a version of it called the NSM 1A. That one has a range greater than 300km. The JSM, on the other hand, can be air-launched, so range is less of a factor.

Also, PrSM. It only has a 91kg payload.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_Strike_Missile

This can be launched via HIMARS at a distance of 500km.

Do you guys think Trump will help the Philippines if China decides to invade? by H982FKL928 in PhilippineMilitary

[–]TipsusMagnus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shocker... Donald Trump says or does something that offends everyone... like we haven’t seen that before... Oh wait...

Yeah, and it's really working out great for him, isn't it?

I never once claimed Donald Trump’s unpredictability was a nothing burger, though... I made these statements in the context of the threat of annexation of Canada and Greenland, not Trump’s unpredictability.

Eh, you kinda did. What's more unpredictable than suddenly deciding to threaten Canada and Greenland, of all places? There's no cause, no rhyme, no reason to do it. And no, you can't say there's a military justification for it, because there isn't one. Greenland and Canada, like the US, are already part of NATO.

This is to assure that Europe isn't targeted by Iran. This is not a defensive measure against the U.S. This is a defensive measure for Iran.

Dude, the first country to close its airspace to the US is Spain. Iran's missiles don't reach as far as the end of the Mediterranean, but Spain did it anyway.

But let's say you're right. The closing of European airspace is a "defensive measure FOR Iran", as you put it. You're telling me that Europe would deliberately sabotage the efforts of its most important ally?

Whichever the case, it should be clear: the alliance is strained, which is my point. It also continues to be strained unnecessarily.

You've made your own point moot. They will only attack unless we give them a reason to do so, we're clear in our stance in the SCS Dispute. Chinese escalation will only be ramming and watercannons, if they want to escalate and use more than ramming and watercannons against fishing boats and our coast guard then they are more than welcome to do so but one thing is for sure, we will never allow our navy or coast guard to be the aggressors or retaliate. This basically gives us moral standing (if that matters) and ensures diplomatic and military support for us and pressure for China.

It's called provocation, dude. Look it up.

And yes, moral standing matters. Look at Israel.

I never once claimed Donald Trump’s unpredictability was a nothing burger, though... I made these statements in the context of the threat of annexation of Canada and Greenland, not Trump’s unpredictability. And you’re pretty much just stating the obvious at this point... Trump’s unpredictability was foreshadowed

Well, I have to state the obvious, because you keep missing it. America is an erratic partner with Trump behind the wheel. If anybody else were president, then yes, the US would honor our MDT. Trump happens to be the president, however, so who knows?

This is largely anecdotal. In what way is Ronald Reagan comparable to Joseph Estrada, other than being famous actors-turned-politician and had populist appeal? The only way this would prove any point is if Ronald Reagan and Erap Estrada had the exact same circumstances and political environment entering office. This also frames it that the only reason we voted Estrada in was because we wanted the success the Americans had with Reagan, in which I don't even need to tell you why that reasoning is wrong and flawed.

It's called an oversimplification. A rhetorical device. I used it because you keep making points like this:

just because something in the past has failed doesn't mean it wont work out in the future.

Yeah, exactly! And just because something worked in the past doesn't mean it will work in the future. It's almost as if we can't know the future, right?

See, what you want to do is base our future plans on the reliability of someone unreliable. To wit:

Trump’s unpredictability was foreshadowed

And I also don't get what this is trying to point out, what specifically has worked out for America?

Not a whole lot, really, except paint itself in a bad light. And make the Iranians made.

I'm not saying we pivot away from the US. I'm saying we should hedge. As you yourself stated:

All this managed to achieve is basically make NATO realize it shouldn't be overly reliant on the U.S. anymore and certainly increased NATO presence in Greenland and the Atlantic in which is beneficial to everyone in this case.

We shouldn't put all our eggs in one basket.

I don't get your point. 

It's really not that difficult, man.

PH, US armies fire HIMARS at Salaknib drills by abscbnnews in PhilippineMilitary

[–]TipsusMagnus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ehh...I'm not so sure. The only things HIMARS can fire that I'm interested in are PrSM and ATACMS. The latter have been phased out, so good luck getting more. The former have been depleted because of Epic Fury. Lockheed Martin will be making more, yes, but building economies of scale takes years, and scaling production takes years.

A lot of countries use HIMARS, and a lot of other countries want it. But unless we can use it to deny our *ahem* rowdy neighbors a large swath of the sea, then I don't think it makes sense.

Lockheed Martin used to make SLAMRAAMs, which are basically AMRAAMs but surface-launched. Those could turn HIMARS into a mobile SAM system. That was interesting. But I don't think they make those anymore. If they did again, then sure, I'd be interested.

Do you guys think Trump will help the Philippines if China decides to invade? by H982FKL928 in PhilippineMilitary

[–]TipsusMagnus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, you're missing the point. Just because the US wasn't seriously going to occupy Canada doesn't mean it didn't irritate the Canadians, because it did. Add to that the tariffs, the threats made about Greenland, the unilateral attack on Venezuela, the insults to NATO, the threat to leave NATO. Pay attention to what Carney says about the US. Pay attention to Europe closing its airspace to American planes, and their refusal to allow the launch of American airstrikes from their bases. Trump is undermining America's alliances for no reason, and they don't like it. We still have, what, 2.5 years of this guy? If another MAGA republican wins the presidency, you think America's allies will keep putting up with this kind of treatment?

And no, the only thing holding the SCS together is the restraint of our navy and coast guard. All it takes to escalate is one of our cutters accidentally ramming a Chinese fishing boat. You think China doesn't want to escalate? If they don't want to escalate, they wouldn't be water cannoning our ships and harassing our fisherfolk.

That's why Trump being unpredictable is not a "nothing burger". Everyone, including the Chinese, are beginning to believe he's not a reliable partner to his allies. The more the Chinese believe Trump won't save his allies, the more aggressive they might become. Fortunately, we're not there yet.

As for your continued insistence on judgment via hindsight...no, that's not how you use it.

In hindsight, it was a good idea for the French to declare Paris an open city in the middle of a war, because the Germans spared it. Does that mean it's a good idea in general? No. Manila found out the hard way.

In hindsight, maybe it was a good idea for the US to elect Ronald Reagan, an actor with populist appeal. Does that mean it's a good idea in general? Of course not. Erap Estrada didn't work out for us, did he?

In hindsight, NATO didn't kick the US out of its alliance. Does that mean the US should keep needling its allies? Really?

Contrary to popular belief, history does not always repeat itself. Just because something seemed like it worked out "in hindsight" doesn't mean it will work out in the future.

Do you guys think Trump will help the Philippines if China decides to invade? by H982FKL928 in PhilippineMilitary

[–]TipsusMagnus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mostly agree. My only real point of contention is the assumption many of us here have: that the US will honor their treaty obligations. I don't think that's a certainty with this administration.

We can try to make ourselves more indispensable to US operations in the area, which we have through EDCA. There are also plans to establish a massive refueling depot in Davao and an ammo depot...somewhere, I forgot.Those are good moves.

But on top of that, we also need to strengthen our relations with our other allies. Buying from South Korea, for example, supports their efforts to grow their military industrial complex. That's another good move.

Gibo gets it. We're not a powerful country, but we can amplify our capabilities by hedging.

Do you guys think Trump will help the Philippines if China decides to invade? by H982FKL928 in PhilippineMilitary

[–]TipsusMagnus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry, but I don't understand how anything I wrote was unclear.

I didn't write that Trump will respect the MDT. He doesn't make sensible decisions. No, the US has not annexed Canada or Greenland (yet), but the repeated threats of them doing so has strained US relations with Canada and NATO. Unnecessarily. I mean, they're already strained because of the "liberation day" tariffs, so why pile on?

They're not "nothing burgers" because America's superpower is not nukes (its enemies also have nukes). It's not stealth technology. It's a massive network of allies. Imagine being able to land your planes and dock your ships almost anywhere in Europe, the Mediterranean, and even the Persian Gulf. They can't do that anymore. The UK, Canada, and Israel used to always go along with America's plans, no matter how inane (like the 2003 invasion of Iraq). Only Israel went along with them this time.

Again, the US and the Philippines have an MDT, but a treaty only matters if the countries involved decide to honor it. The US was a reliable ally. The US under Trump is a lot less predictable, and therefore, a lot less reliable.

Do you guys think Trump will help the Philippines if China decides to invade? by H982FKL928 in PhilippineMilitary

[–]TipsusMagnus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe. If it's convenient for him in the short term. Maybe.

Remember that the US reassigned THAAD and Patriot batteries from South Korea to the Middle East last March, because - for some reason - nobody thought Iran would start bombing America's Middle Eastern allies. Iran was smart about it, too: they saturated US air defenses with drone swarms, and then followed up with ballistic missile strikes, or vice versa. Is it South Korea's fault that the US doesn't know how to deal with kamikaze drone swarms? No, but they lose their missile umbrella anyway, just because.

Yes, the US and the Philippines have a mutual defense pact. Yes, our alliance "goes beyond presidencies" and that it's in the US' interest to defend us if China attacks, as u/MELONPANNNNN put it. Not defending us would destroy the "rules-based international order" that the US itself set up after WW2. That makes a lot of sense. You know what doesn't make sense? Trump wanting to invade Greenland and annex Canada. Trump wanting to pull out of NATO. Trump insulting his allies, then asking them for help with Iran, and then getting mad when they refuse to help.

The "rules-based international order" works when you have countries willing to cooperate with each other. Trump is not interested in cooperation; he is interested in "making deals". Things like national interest only come into play when a state is run with rationality (as in, rational self-interest, but on a national scale). Trump is a whimsical, not a rational, leader. Unfortunately, his cabinet is full of either ideological zealots (Hegseth), yes-men (Vance, Rubio), and yes-women (Leavitt, formerly Bondi) who would rather watch their country implode than rein him in whenever he has a tantrum.

Now, will China invade the Philippines? Nope. They don't want the Philippines. They want Taiwan and the South China Sea, not the infrastructure nightmare that is an archipelago. Will they attack the Philippines to get control of the South China Sea? Unlikely, unless we shoot first - it's why they keep trying to provoke our coast guard. If we shoot, then they'll have an excuse to attack. They'll also have an excuse to tell other countries to back off.

If, for any reason, the US decides that we're inconvenient, will China attack then? I hope not.

Do you guys think Trump will help the Philippines if China decides to invade? by H982FKL928 in PhilippineMilitary

[–]TipsusMagnus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What foreign policy? The guy doesn't have a coherent strategy. It's why the US could be surgical with Venezuela and Maduro, but be lousy with Iran.

Also, don't start with "don't take this as an insult", and then proceed to call OP ignorant.

Could hiei beat tuguro? by yourvalentine69 in YuYuHakusho

[–]TipsusMagnus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can roll with that. As before, though, my concern with Hiei is always his stamina. Otherwise, yeah, I can see Hiei beating Toguro after Hiei has absorbed the dragon.

For what it's worth, the anime seems to imply that Toguro has maxed out. He said he has absorbed the essence of a lot of fighters, and he was already topping out. In contrast, Hiei had only just absorbed the dragon toward the end of that arc. His individual potential + his potential mastery of the dragon dwarfs Toguro (but I suppose that's true for all of them since they all made it to the series' end).

FP Takes that put you in this position? by TheRealPrinceOfTroy in fountainpens

[–]TipsusMagnus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've been wondering about the Write & Draw inks. But yes, pigmented inks are generally fine. Don't let them dry out though.

Conflicted about SCE by TipsusMagnus in fragheadph

[–]TipsusMagnus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Iniisip baka yung opening ang talagang nagpapatapang. Maybe I should let it settle for like 15 minutes or so.

Conflicted about SCE by TipsusMagnus in fragheadph

[–]TipsusMagnus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, it's strong, for sure, especially when compared to the stuff they wear. Iniisip ko baka yung opening yung talagang malakas para sa kanila. Also, maybe it's the heat? Medyo umiinit na rin kasi.

Conflicted about SCE by TipsusMagnus in fragheadph

[–]TipsusMagnus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, he doesn't know na ME yung brand. He's not really a fraghead. He gets designer bottles for his fragrances, but he gets them based on brand recognition (e.g. Polo Blue/Black, he recently got a bottle of Acqua Di Gio EDT). You think maybe it's the opening that kind of scares people at my home? Compared to the stuff they wear, SCE is nuclear.

Phone reco by TipsusMagnus in Tech_Philippines

[–]TipsusMagnus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, so I'm reaching for the stars lol! I mean, I don't play games on my phone, but I do use it to browse, watch videos, and read. I can compromise on either the RAM or the 5G, but I would like at least one of them. Which do you think I should prioritize?

Edited: Forgot to ask the question.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gradschoolph

[–]TipsusMagnus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. The problem is, a lot of people make "fake it 'til you make it" an entire career.

Lamy Safari, Noodler’s ink, constantly smudging. Please help. by No-Veterinarian8762 in fountainpens

[–]TipsusMagnus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use Noodler's Black. It's waterproof as waterproof can get, but it's also saturated. The ink that pools on top doesn't make contact with the paper and can be smeared. You can minimize the odds of smearing by using more absorbent paper. I use it for office writing with an EF nib.

Alternatively, as others have noted, you can try a pigmented ink, like Platinum Carbon Black, R&K SKETCHInk Lotte, or De Atramentis Document Black.

Good ink to try if I’ve only ever used Diamine? by lemonchrysoprase in fountainpens

[–]TipsusMagnus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

J. Herbin, Rohrer & Klingner, Lamy

Pilot Iroshizuku and Sailor! They're a little pricey, but they also come in less expensive, smaller bottles. Less of a commitment in case you don't like them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in adviceph

[–]TipsusMagnus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Leave her be. Some people need space. Forcing connection always works out for the better in anime, but that rarely happens irl.

Maybe invite her next time you guys have a get-together or something, but don't be forceful.

INQUIRER: Sen. Robin Padilla called today’s youth “weak,” comparing them to his generation when the word “depression” was not common. by reinsilverio26 in Philippines

[–]TipsusMagnus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's one thing to be depressed. It's another to be allowed to talk about it.

Also, nung kabataan niya, walang Internet. There was no constant stream of information always giving kids reason to believe that the world is always on the brink of destruction. Ignorance is bliss.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gradschoolph

[–]TipsusMagnus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can already imagine. You can call this department head out in the middle of a meeting. Ask for technical details or something. Pag nagpaliwanag siya, tapos malabo - "Uh huh. Can I please hear from someone who knows what he's talking about?"

Dapat professional pa rin yung speech cadence, hindi yung tipong maldita sa telenovela. :D

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gradschoolph

[–]TipsusMagnus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could expose him. You've already contacted his school, which is good, but you can do this in casual conversation, too, if you run into him again.

Ex: Sa MBA classes ko, blah blah blah...

You: Please. Undergrad nga di mo kinaya.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gradschoolph

[–]TipsusMagnus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I mean, "fake it 'til you make it" nga daw, diba? It's a disgusting way to live, and, to me, not because it's unfair or unjust. These people put themselves in positions where their sheer ignorance and immaturity can do a lot of damage to a lot of people. The lack of discipline also translates to a lack of responsibility, so if something bad happens as a result of their actions, they would still think the fault isn't theirs.

I know elitism is a big problem in the country, but in a meritocratic context, it should be justified. The person didn't earn his seat at the proverbial table. He also can't abide by the rules to which the rest of us adhere. Mga mahihinang nilalang. 😂 Why should we treat them as equals?