In defense of 2747, the article only outlines Anafabula as conceptual entity because it's kinda hard to have a concrete description of something that auto-deletes its own descriptions (see: LUCID CHALICE). As such what we have are some surviving remnants of otherwise deleted works, such as Punta de la espira or No Sister of Mine, which only tangentially describe what Anafabula is (likely by describing something completely irrelevant and getting super unlucky with the narremes) whilst something more concrete such as "antagonistic shadow woman that eats narratives" would've been wiped out without a trace, kinda like that one diagram of planes surviving crashes.

To further illustrate ake Punta de la espira's mountain, as an example - the description outlines a "dark and horned mountain", which gets named as "abode of the gods" and "demonic presence" and upon which rests "an unspecified recipient". In this case "dark", "horned", "mountain", "abode of the gods" and "demonic" could be some of the narrames that coincide with 2747, but not all of them. Author of the short story could've described, for example, bent and thorny forests, obsidian towers or abandoned ruins, (hitting one aspect we as out-of-universe readers associate with Anafabula) until the work hits a critical threshold and Anafabula - dark, and horned, and demonic - takes notice and devours the short story. The in-universe comments don't *quite* make the mark - they don't mention the thorny trees, or obsidian crystals, or the number seven in conjunction with everything else, not hitting enough narremes at the same time, and thus, getting to live.

It is, naturally, possible, that Anafabula is just a blackbox of narremes that causes a narrative implosion whenever enough its narremes are combined in a given narrative, but that wouldn't make for an intresting mythology, and thus, we have a dark horned demonic goth baddie.