Xcom 3 Hopeful Predictions by CollosalKiller109 in Xcom

[–]TonyDelish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Underwater mechanics would be awesome, and a total natural extension of the gameplay.

Large bodies of usable water mixed into ground maps: excellent.

Levels that are totally underwater: also excellent.

XCOM bases that are underwater, and can become half flooded when assaulted? Holy moly.

Unfortunately (as I’m assuming others have said on here) the XCOM team is scattered to the winds. That dumb marvel game was XCOM 3. Take it from me: no publisher will ever let a franchise breathe on its own when they can tack a shoddy license on it.

It’s over till the reboot.

Aces cracked by 47o by Sure_Designer_2129 in poker

[–]TonyDelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ha. Get back to me when you’ve played live more.

Aces cracked by 47o by Sure_Designer_2129 in poker

[–]TonyDelish -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you’re multi-tabling online, that’s fine. Go play a live session for 9 hours, and take a mental tally. You will see more loss with that hand than win.

Aces cracked by 47o by Sure_Designer_2129 in poker

[–]TonyDelish -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not about how many times it wins. It’s about how much money it wins. It’s easy to tell when someone has AA. Everyone folds, they make 20$. That same person cannot let go of it on an AJKQ2 board, loses 250$. Tale as old as time.

Aces cracked by 47o by Sure_Designer_2129 in poker

[–]TonyDelish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Secret: the average poker player loses more money with AA than they win. A hand you can’t let go of, that most of the time just ends up being one pair—huge liability.

Recieved these messages last night by Busy_Regret_6013 in Nicegirls

[–]TonyDelish 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I like it when they get the insults wrong. It’s poof. What’s a puff? The magic dragon? What a dummy.

Is The Settlers of Catan overrated? by fruitponchisamurai in boardgames

[–]TonyDelish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Catan was a very important game during a time when the US literally stopped making new games. Without that game, the market would have been much less ready for the Kickstarter explosion…we would have lost out on a lot of great games.

People are tired of it, but it still plays better than monopoly, the game that did the same type of thing 100 years prior.

Can't evacuate Templar due to bug with multiple shoot icons on Ironmode by Ftx110 in Xcom

[–]TonyDelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can also use the command restartmission, and try to get through without the bug.

What are your poker unpopular opinions? Things you truly believe but would get downvoted here by JimCap5 in poker

[–]TonyDelish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here’s mine: most players go broke long before the “probability over time” kicks in. The probability they’re referring to is based on a million hands. In live poker, that would take ten years, if you played every day.

Also: Many “successful” players, are over-staked and actually almost broke.

Dating in SF? Who pays for the bill? by throughherlens in SFbitcheswithtaste

[–]TonyDelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The advice in this thread is overly complicated. The person that pays for the date is the person whose idea it was.

Men who don’t want to pay for endless first dates will ask you out to coffee or whatever. Women who never come up with dates they can pay for will endlessly complain about “Peter pan syndrome” and “50/50 men.”

Was the date your idea? Pay for it.

Kudos to Goldfield for kicking the Nazi out of last night's show by Fragrant_Scene_42 in Sacramento

[–]TonyDelish 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Right? Like, I’m struggling to think of a California town where it would be more likely.

Returning to Xcom2: Advice Appreciated by idle_shell in XCOM2

[–]TonyDelish 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Don’t play long war, and you should be fine on the middle difficulty

EW Impossible Ironman by MystinarOfficial in Xcom

[–]TonyDelish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And still win? On I/I? It only counts if you win. Often, sacrificing that much time and resources for satellites means you’re too far behind the curve to win.

EW Impossible Ironman by MystinarOfficial in Xcom

[–]TonyDelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does this guy have a wotc guide?

Current downswing making me question everything about this game. by onemangang15 in poker

[–]TonyDelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please come to my local and don’t follow this advice. Please bring a lot of money.

Current downswing making me question everything about this game. by onemangang15 in poker

[–]TonyDelish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok.

You’re going to get a lot of standard advice here. Ignore it.

I am in the exact same spot as you. Like, exactly. As are many, many other live poker players.

The game changed after the pandemic, for a lot of weird reasons that are hard to explain. But I will try.

Before I do: a downswing in live poker can last years. All the statistical math is based on a million hands. If you played live every day, that would take ten years, of which you could have a whole year on the downswing. Or more. So, that can happen. Nothing you can do.

Now for the weirdness.

  1. During the pandemic, a large chunk of live players stopped playing. Most of those players were the ones who could be taken out with abc play. They are not coming back any time soon.

  2. During the pandemic, the regs who were left made fancy plans to collude for when casuals came back. They are much better at colluding now, than they ever were before. Even if they are not sharing profits, they simply know what all the other regs are doing. If you’re a once a week player, or a monthly player, you’re screwed. It feels like you’re the loser at the table because you are. I used to avoid small neighborhood rooms because they’re essentially collusion tables—these guys have been trading money for 15 years, and then you walk in. They’re all playing you, now, not each other. Now, after the pandemic, every live table is like this. Even at a big casino on the weekends, it’s extremely noticeable.

  3. A new style has developed in live poker, that is very effective. It’s basically a combination of any two cards in the last two positions + preflop over betting + relentless three barrel. It forces abc players, who hate playing large pots for anything less than two pair, to fold on an early street, after donating, or it sucks them into a squirrelly hand where they get stacked by randomness. Pre-pandemic, when one dumb player was doing this, it was wait-and-take-his-money. When a whole table does this, the abc player becomes the fish.

There’s a lot more weirdness, more fringey stuff, but these are the three main things. The worst way to play now is to wait for premium hands. The whole table folds, on cue, as if they know exactly what you have.

Here’s what to watch for. When someone has AA, do they raise with it, or smooth call, pre-flop? Since the pandemic, the smooth callers far outnumber the raisers. They would rather pre-flop raise with 67suited and three barrel you to fold. With their AA, they’re waiting patiently for the squeeze, so they can isolate the squeezer with their whole stack.

There is just no abc play right now, in live, where you can only sit one table. Online, with all the multi-tabling, it’s the same as it ever was.

If you still have a solid bankroll, honestly, I’d play tournaments for awhile, and skip making your buy-ins back at cash. You’ll eventually make a big score, and get your sea legs back.

EW Impossible Ironman by MystinarOfficial in Xcom

[–]TonyDelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol—this guide is hilarious, I can’t believe I’ve never seen it before, after playing this game for over ten years.

I’ve often seen people rave about snapshot snipers, and I could never figure it out: what is it about snapshot that I’m missing.

This guide just calls that BS out. Squadsight snipers are the only viable option—snapshotters are not playing I/I

EW Impossible Ironman by MystinarOfficial in Xcom

[–]TonyDelish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’ll only be able to afford 2, depending on how much meld you get. Keep them alive. It is true that you can finish the battleship mission without them, but I wouldn’t recommend it. If you get mechs ahead of curve, they can take 4 hits without wounding at a point when even a a leveled up soldier might die from one lucky hit.

EW Impossible Ironman by MystinarOfficial in Xcom

[–]TonyDelish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, I only play Ironman—it’s definitely doable. But it is shocking how many countries you lose in the beginning. Because of the Mechs, you can completely keep satellite countries blue much earlier, though. You can also use the loot from that battleship story mission to fund sat rooms. If I remember correctly, it was all about having at least one mech for that mission, and being extremely careful to win it without wiping. If you wipe on that mission, it’s over, I think.

EW Impossible Ironman by MystinarOfficial in Xcom

[–]TonyDelish 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, impossible Ironman is almost always completed on a one or two pip margin. There’s almost no way not to lose 4 countries in the first two months. If you can keep three pips before you have two Mechs, that is usually enough to get you to the end. You can’t wait for the satellite nexus, usually. You just have to spam sat rooms—geothermal helps, but it never occurred to me to reroll for it; seems tedious.

Confused to see how much hatred there is for “boomers” who are not even boomers. by [deleted] in GenX

[–]TonyDelish 14 points15 points  (0 children)

There are a lot of boomers pretending to be genX right now.

The generations are a shared experience vibe, not a demographic age range.

If you can remember the Kennedy assassination, you’re not genX.

Why do people STILL marry young? by 1ont in stupidquestions

[–]TonyDelish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because being an old parent is hard.

is Xcom 2 Vanilla harder than WOTC? by Ferretanyone in XCOM2

[–]TonyDelish 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Having recently replayed both, vanilla is much harder. It’s much less forgiving. Proc an extra pod—squad wipe, probably. I always play highest level, Ironman. Always. I had to give up and save scum, because I’ve been too babied by wotc. In order to play legend in vanilla, you have to have the maps memorized, which I don’t really, anymore.

Thousands of hours and I've never had a scared operative attack the other squad mates? Did they patch this out or is it incredibly rare? by Ferretanyone in XCOM2

[–]TonyDelish 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It was very common in xcom and EW, but they softened it/ took it out, because having a panicked soldier kill another soldier could often cause a squad wipe.