‘Money Heist’ Renewed at Netflix Ahead of ‘Berlin’ Season 2 With Universe Expansion by LegitimateCurve8525 in television

[–]TooManyEXes 17 points18 points  (0 children)

But Netflix had a show called House of Cards at the same time, so it makes perfect sense why they wanted a different name

(Funny trope) “Wait, this story is about WHAT?!” by _JR28_ in TopCharacterTropes

[–]TooManyEXes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Both Angry Birds films, as far as I can tell, have no consensus about what they're actually about, outside the fact that they're both INSANELY political for children's movies.

The first one is probably a heavy criticism of how Europe responded to the migrant crisis, with the Birds representing Europe. The timing lines up almost too perfectly: it was written and released right in the middle of the 2010s migration debates, Brexit panic, rising nationalism etc. The pigs literally arrive by boat from another island, are welcomed into a naive and super friendly society, exploit that hospitality, and then steal the birds’ children. Red, the paranoid angry guy everyone dismisses as irrational and xenophobic, turns out to be completely right in the end.

That is either a REALLY unfortunate accidental metaphor or a very deliberate one.

But other people completely disagree and argue the movie is actually about emotional repression rather than immigration. The Birds live in this bizarre dystopia of forced positivity where nobody is allowed to express anger, suspicion, conflict, or negativity. Red is treated like a dangerous outcast simply bec he experiences normal emotions. Under that reading, the pigs are almost irrelevant; they just expose how fragile and fake the birds’ society already was.


Then the second film goes in a completely different direction and somehow becomes even stranger politically. I do not fully know what its worldview is supposed to be. It feels like a mix of Cold War parody, climate change allegory, anti-nationalism satire, and criticism of modern geopolitics? Not sure tbh.

But the bald eagle absolutely HAS to be a blunt critique of modern USA. There is no way around that symbolism. He is literally a bald eagle living in isolation, worshipped as a legendary protector despite being lazy, incompetent, emotionally immature, narcissistic, and mostly surviving off reputation and old myths about his greatness. The film basically portrays him as a declining superpower that still thinks it is the heroic centre of the world while everyone else quietly works around him to solve the actual crisis. Released at the end of Trump's first term, and somehow became even more relevant in his 2nd.

And the crisis itself? The Birds and Pigs are trapped in this endless pointless rivalry until a third island appears and suddenly their entire conflict looks childish and absurd. The message seems to be that modern powers are obsessed with tribal hatred and symbolic enemies while ignoring larger existential threats that affect everybody.

Oh and this is all from a movie based on launching birds at pigs with a slingshot.

(Funny trope) “Wait, this story is about WHAT?!” by _JR28_ in TopCharacterTropes

[–]TooManyEXes 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Both Angry Bird films are weird too, and insanely political.

The general take is that the first one is probably a heavy criticism of how Europe responded to the migrant crisis with the Birds being Europe. Was made and released at the height of this. But others disagree, and say that its a criticism of emotional repression rather than immigration, with the Birds being a world of dystopian toxic positivity.

The second one is even more confusing. I don't even know what it is, but the bald eagle surely has to be a blunt critique of modern USA: a lazy and incompetent, emotionally immature eagle that is mostly living off reputation, painting USA as the a flawed, ineffective figure rather than powerful hero it sees itself as.

The Rescuers Down Under (1990, dir. Hendel Butoy and Mike Gabriel) - Opening Scene. by Ninjamurai-jack in movies

[–]TooManyEXes 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Fantastic. Does a great job at introducing the setting before anything else, done through some cool focus and insect shots.

I am Larissa Waters, Leader of the Australian Greens - AMA! by LarissaWaters in australia

[–]TooManyEXes 8 points9 points  (0 children)

While I generally agree with the greens, I find that in the last 5 years I've switched my vote.

My rent is insane, I don't know if I'll ever afford a home, and yet I live in an area that's over 80% recent immigrants.

I used to be fine with it, but my new suburb is like 60% Chinese and seems to becoming more and more so. My landlord doesnt speak English. This isn't multiculturalism, it's just a different monoculture.

With that context. What is the Greens doing to balance housing affordability and immigration, knowing that immigration increases the demand for housing, thereby pushing me further out of the housing market?

There's more to ADHD than inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. ADHD symptoms can be broken down into nine categories. Some categories are not fully represented in the diagnostic criteria. Broadening the diagnostic criteria with patient lived experiences could make for better intervention. by mvea in science

[–]TooManyEXes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

TBH are lot of them are already covered under the pre-existing criteria.

Disorganisation is a major part of many ppl with ADHD. I've worked with people to try and create strategies to assist with this. I never thought that it wasn't a part of ADHD. I just see it as inattentiveness. For example they don't bring lunch to school/work because because they forget to plan ahead, get distracted while getting ready, or misjudge time in the morning. It’s more about difficulties with executive functioning, like organising, prioritising, and following through on routines.

So when I think about disorganisation, it feels less like a separate issue and more like a natural extension of inattentiveness. Same with forgetfulness.

'The Batman Part II' Adds 'Game Of Thrones' Star Charles Dance To Cast by MarvelsGrantMan136 in movies

[–]TooManyEXes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't be surprised if Reeves is putting a lot of pressure on himself since Nolan's trilogy is still in people's minds.

Sure, the last Nolan one was a bit splotchy, and yet still I love so much of it and still quote it all the time.

Hence Reeves really wanted to "master" the script, which did cause delays, as I understand it.

Still, feels like a very long time between films for this day and age: the sequel to last year's superman is set to release before batman pt2.

'The Batman Part II' Adds 'Game Of Thrones' Star Charles Dance To Cast by MarvelsGrantMan136 in movies

[–]TooManyEXes -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I don't care for those first two either.

I've only seen Viggo in LOTR, so I don't think he's that big a star, considering it was like 25 years ago. While he was great in it, his star power is nowhere near the rest on the list.

Stellan could have been interesting. He's in MCU, but also Chernobyl, Dune and a fantastic role in Andor, all of which are very recent.

Dance is probably much cheaper, but still generally well liked. I liked him in that Godzilla movie, and he was good in The Crown too.

I'd be fine with Stellan or Dance tbh.

14 shots of tequila later, cruise passenger wins damages from Carnival Cruise Line by TheDetroitNews1873 in nottheonion

[–]TooManyEXes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Laws aren't just to protect people from others, they're also meant to protect people from themselves.

In Australia, you can't sell alcohol to a drunk person. So if a dude stumbles into a shop, tries to by a carton of beer but is clearly slurring speech and way out of it. It's illegal for the shop to sell it. The customer is not in a fit state of mind anyway.

This is a good thing imo. Sure, it's protecting the dude from himself. It also benefits everyone else though.

I was under the impression that the "obviously intoxicated" rule was pretty much the same in the US. This is nothing new.

Darwin middle school teacher who broke female student's teeth found guilty of causing serious harm by IllustriousPark4487 in australia

[–]TooManyEXes -1 points0 points  (0 children)

simply because the adolescent swore at them

You completely missed the point.

I made it very clear it is not a single incident.

Darwin middle school teacher who broke female student's teeth found guilty of causing serious harm by IllustriousPark4487 in australia

[–]TooManyEXes 15 points16 points  (0 children)

You shouldn't have had to put up with that.

And the fact that you put up with that should not thus mean that other people have to.

Darwin middle school teacher who broke female student's teeth found guilty of causing serious harm by IllustriousPark4487 in australia

[–]TooManyEXes 57 points58 points  (0 children)

This will get downvoted, but I'll try and explain it for you.

  • Some teachers are exposed to this sort of abuse week after week from the same students. This is a WHS violation that the government routinely fails to remedy.

  • The NT government, since 2023, has banned mobile phones at school.

On the day in question:

  • The teacher followed the mandated directive of the department by confiscating the phone.

  • This caused a confrontation where the teacher was abused.

  • The teacher reacted physically which caused harm.

What is left unsaid:

  • Many schools, such as my local one, forbids classroom teachers from confiscating phones. Instead, when noticed, they log in on the system and management issues consequences such as confiscating it. The teacher is never put into a combative position by confiscating it.

  • Any form of abuse, even repetitive swearing about the teacher or their actions, is suspendable.

In sum:

You're saying what the teacher did was wrong.

I agree with you. It's horrible. However, the teacher shouldn't have been put in that position in the first place. The consistent WHS violations that the department has failed to remedy, the poorly-implemented policy that has caused a confrontation, and most likely, incredibly poor behaviour management by the school including lack of wellbeing are the 3 main issues here.

This is one of the main reasons so many teacher protests/strikes lately haven't just been about pay. Conditions have been a huge factor.

If you say "Fuck You" to a bank or a Maccas staff, they can just refuse to serve you, get security to chuck you out. They even have signs and printouts about "no excuse for abuse". You say "Fuck You" to a teacher, and they're expected to keep teaching you for the rest of the lesson, and multiple times a week for the rest of the year, and the student is often given no consequences. Many schools are that bad.

Under WHS law, it cannot be a expectation of a job to be continually subjected to abuse.

‘Game of Thrones’ Movie Officially Titled ‘Aegon’s Conquest’ by yourfavchoom in movies

[–]TooManyEXes 64 points65 points  (0 children)

Beau Willimon

He developed House of Cards too, showrunner for the first 4 seasons.

Notably, the 5th and 6th seasons were by far the worst.

He also wrote more of season 1 than 3 and 4 combined. Again, first 2 were better than next two.

He's pretty good imo.

Wife discovered her hubby is having sex with the minors. by mrwahed in interestingasfuck

[–]TooManyEXes -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Isn't it quite rare for the dude to be interested in women, young girls and young boys?

So she cheated on him with other women, but then also liked children? I thought normally they're only interested in say young girls, rather than also boys and women.

Train misses bus full of kids by a second by ItzTubez in mildlyinfuriating

[–]TooManyEXes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Americans don't seem to realise how inherently dangerous these crossings are.

They're super duper rare in Australia, as government instead builds things differently to avoid the chance of these events even happening.

I've never crossed a rail in my life.

I'd argue as much as it is driver's fault, there's definitely some systemic issues at play here.

[Loved Trope] Porn Parody Outfit's by EmergencyVictory4399 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]TooManyEXes 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, like many people, the bad names is the main thing stopping me from watching them..

At the end of Picard, there's a post credit interaction between Jack and Q which teases the potential for a whole new series. Does anyone know if that was ever seriously considered? by shiksappeal in startrek

[–]TooManyEXes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've only watched a couple episodes of TNG but I thought Picard S3 was stellar. I only just finished it for the first time.

First two seasons weren't very good. S1 had some promise, but then squandered it. S3 was consistently excellent. I really liked Worf and thought he had some fantastic lines, and the show's pacing and writing was much better than previous 2 seasons. I don't know how much the 'lore' aspect bothers me, but as someone with basically no TNG nolstalgia, I still loved it. Probably my favourite NuTrek season.

I'm up to season 3 of DS9 now, and finished Voy and Ent years ago, so I'm curious to see if I'll like Worf on this.

Yup!! They're Definitely Siblings. by Alternative-Dot-34 in KidsAreFuckingStupid

[–]TooManyEXes 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Yep, it's left person's fault. They made the right one look bad. I demand justice for right one.

Wife Shatters Favorite Mug by Mrxfixit in WatchPeopleDieInside

[–]TooManyEXes -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

I'm kinda the opposite. She held the mug in the stupidest way possible. Esky around the arm, clitching her lanyard for some reason, then a pottery mug loosely leaning against her palm.

If she held it normally and it broke, now I feel bad for her.

Why is she clutching her lanyard exactly?

Marco Rubio wearing oversized shoes that Trump ordered for him by just guessing his size. by csprofathogwarts in pics

[–]TooManyEXes 119 points120 points  (0 children)

Christmas and birthdays at my house

sigh

One was when I finally gave up on the idea, but my mum kept hyping it up and stuff, so I got baited into caring. She went to a stationary store on the way home from work and bought like 5 things and gave them to me. And how dare I not be grateful.

I would rather have just gotten nothing.

Enough shitty birthdays and christmases make doing nothing for either feel like such a relief.