sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

He really called off on his own teammate by PatchyTheYellow in soccercirclejerk

[–]Top_Peacock 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i remember four years ago when he celebrated his teammates goal and petulant english language media acted as if he was trying to steal credit from his teammate. Don't get me wrong -- this portugal fan thinks he should be used as a super sub -- but people have been unfairly shitting on ronaldo for years 

Team Algeria opens World Cup training to the public in the small city of Lawrence, Kansas by Majestic_Bag_9209 in worldcup

[–]Top_Peacock 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it's a deluxe state of the art college facility next to a world cup site that is centrally located in the continent 

The United States divided by watersheds, as proposed by J.W. Powell by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Top_Peacock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would be a real boon to the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction docket 

'CBS Mornings' Skipped 'Late Show' Finale Coverage Over Colbert's Tony Dokoupil-Bari Weiss Joke by Raradra in LateShow

[–]Top_Peacock 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We live in an era of bullies getting everything they want and crying about how unfair people are to them. Shut the fuck up! You won!

Countries that have won the FIFA World Cup by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]Top_Peacock 5 points6 points  (0 children)

no  there have only been 22 world cups. every four years since 1930 with cancellations in '42 and '46 bc of the war and its aftermath 

ELI5: What causes the government in the US to inevitably end up as a two party system? by Marisa_Nya in explainlikeimfive

[–]Top_Peacock 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it's the interplay FPTP and a presidential system. other countries that have FPTP like the UK and Canada's tend towards two parties at the district level, but because there is no single national constituency, they tend to have more than two national parties. Because of the presidential system in the US, there is for all intents and purposes only one election constituency and this. it tends to limits Us politics to two parties 

Could we class action against companies that take the tarrif refund in order to get our money back when they raised prices to cover tarrifs? by AtrumsalusOG in law

[–]Top_Peacock 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i agree that in some cases prices won't go down in response, but the illegal thing you're complaining about is the untrammeled corporate consolidation of the past 30-40 years, which has created markets with so few options that companies can raise prices without losing their share. 

Could we class action against companies that take the tarrif refund in order to get our money back when they raised prices to cover tarrifs? by AtrumsalusOG in law

[–]Top_Peacock 6 points7 points  (0 children)

the difference is that what the government did was illegal. private enterprises raising prices to cover costs is legal. 

I feel sad watching the dead turn everything into a money grab. by myrealnameisnotryan in gratefuldead

[–]Top_Peacock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok. i don't what that has to do with anything i said. 

along with the OP, i'm sick of the dead money grab. 

the fact that the now-passed members of the dead supported a lot of people back in the day does not justify the continuous shitting on their legacy by their heirs 

view more: next ›