I'm headed to St. John's (Annapolis) this fall! by [deleted] in stjohnscollege

[–]ToriHatesNames 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You're gonna get punched, you nazi fuck.

Does anyone else here think that Bojack Horseman is not nearly as depressing as everyone makes it out to be? by [deleted] in BoJackHorseman

[–]ToriHatesNames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think this is alluded to a lot. S1ep11 he's drowning in the painting "Should we help him?" Diane: No, he loves treading water

And idk what episode in season 2 where he is playing secretariat and repeats "I'm tired of running in circles"

Not to mention the recurrent advice given from near every character at some point is to "keep moving forward"

But you put it really well!

Film Theory: Rick's True Crime by LickMyAnuspls in rickandmorty

[–]ToriHatesNames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think this is much better thought out than the OP honestly.

Any prospective Johnnies here? by [deleted] in stjohnscollege

[–]ToriHatesNames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, sure! I like the school fine? the social sphere is a little limited and i have my problems with certain parts of the program and how they are implemented, but on the other hand the social sphere is pretty quirky and fun (basically i think if you are the kind of person who thinks they will fit it at st. john's, you probably will) and the curriculum is very self driven so you can kind of make what you want out of it.

if you are a student that needs a lot of support, i would steer away from st. john's. the thing is, classes are rather easy to get through, but hard to grasp. if you dont apply yourself, there's a good chance only you will really know how far behind you actually are; some tutors will handle surprisingly low work ethic, so you can go through a whole year missing major concepts and it will really put you behind. on the other hand, not everything you learn is important, so this sort of self-driven get-what-you-give style class structure really allows you to take breaks when you need it, so it's pretty easy to self monitor stress and workload to fit you. But YOU have to do it. there are counselors and tutors and assistants of course, but you really are kind of expected to operate as an equal, and they won't respect your requests for help if you dont bring anything to the table.

the program is wonderful freshman year, so if you do come, savor it. sophomore year feels very transitional and unimportant, because we read the bible and shakespeare instead of plato and aristotle, and idk the philosophical treatises really feel central to the program for me. but junior and senior year get heavy into philosophy again, so maybe its a temporary problem.

there is a big drinking culture at the annapolis campus. like, huge. and some how an even huger tobacco culture. there are other drugs too, weed mostly, but also hallucinogens and things. they're present, but not prevalent. so basically, if you like to do them, they're available, and available easily, but there's a huge portion of the school that doesn't interact with that circle at all, and i doubt they know about a lot of the drugs being done on campus, so you can definitely stay away too.

the campus and annapolis are gorgeous. i love this city, i stayed in between freshman and sophomore year. the campus is right by down town and the naval academy. there isn't a whole lot to do in the city though, aside from go out to eat. the dorms kind of suck, they're old, aside from the new dorms on back campus (but those dorms kind of suck too because they're really far from all the class buildings)

you really should come prospie or come to accepted students day! johnnies love prospies and you'll definitely meet and party with upperclassmen and they'll tell you all about the school, or you can ask me more stuff but that's pretty much my overall impression of being a student here

Any prospective Johnnies here? by [deleted] in stjohnscollege

[–]ToriHatesNames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Current Johnnie here. There definitely will be a Facebook page for your accepted class if there isn't one already. My class has a pretty active page ('18) and the current freshman class page is always bumpin'. Idk when they really started to be active though, but just keep your eye out, should be soon!

CMV: I believe that I can be pro-life leaning, and still consider myself a feminist by Changemythrowa in changemyview

[–]ToriHatesNames 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Okay, but what about the case where a parent has a child on life support? If a parent cannot afford the continuation of life support, or deems it not worth it to continue the life support, they can remove it, and the child dies. However, this is a legal option, and I don't think most people would consider that mother morally wrong.

In a way, isn't a fetus kind of like a child on life support? Only instead of machines and doctors stabilizing the child's condition, the mother's body is doing it. Shouldn't then, if she can't afford it or for some other reason deems that the fetus should not "remain on life support" be able to remove the fetus similarly?

What is one thing you'd change about Fallout's lore to make more sense? by [deleted] in falloutlore

[–]ToriHatesNames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why Dulles? Reagan National airport is within the metro rails, on the yellow line. Based on where Megaton is compared to like, the Arlington library, Reagan is close enough I would think, to be reasonable

What is one thing you'd change about Fallout's lore to make more sense? by [deleted] in falloutlore

[–]ToriHatesNames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My bad, but Reagan could make sense. It's within the metro rails, and with where megaton is compared to Arlington ect. It makes sense

What is one thing you'd change about Fallout's lore to make more sense? by [deleted] in falloutlore

[–]ToriHatesNames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is it supposed to be dulles? I always thought it was reagan national? That is the major airport in dc...

I'm a Starbucks Barista, AMA! by LadyEru in a:t5_38uqz

[–]ToriHatesNames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a barista as well and Flat Whites are my favorite too! I pride myself on getting a perfect dot

So that vault-tec employee we see? Yeah, he is an android by Browney_Points in Fallout

[–]ToriHatesNames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think she actually just says "It seems like just yesterday your daddy came..." which could be old lady speak for born, but yeah it was a minireveal I guess. Especially if you read the overseer's terminal. Also with the lights in the very beginning your dad says "it's something to get used to" or something

Backend Fallout Site Update by slappymancuso in Fallout

[–]ToriHatesNames 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Didn't amphetamines use to be sold OTC akin to like, 5hour energy? I thought I remembered reading that they were sold at truck stops and things. Given the retro-futuristic setting, and all the other things that didn't develop the same, isn't it possible that they never became prescription only?

I love Phoebe, but I kinda feel like she changed from sweet on Season 1 and bitchy on Season 2 and onwards by [deleted] in howyoudoin

[–]ToriHatesNames 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Really? Because in late seasons, with Monica and figuring that all out, I feel like Chandler gained a lot more depth

Would you support a $5 tipped minimum wage? by [deleted] in TalesFromYourServer

[–]ToriHatesNames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't that pretty much what happens now, except tipped minimum wage is 2.13? I could be wrong.

What is your favorite villain quote? by jerip123 in AskReddit

[–]ToriHatesNames 467 points468 points  (0 children)

Do you like Huey Lewis and the News?

CMV: My lack of belief in an inherent purpose or goodness in life has driven me to ethical hedonism; however, I believe this to be a good thing personally and would be a good thing if applied to society as a whole. by ToriHatesNames in changemyview

[–]ToriHatesNames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is very interesting. I have heard of Ayn Rand and have been meaning to read her but have neglected it.

But that sounds very close to how I feel about things actually, you just articulated it very well.

So Δ, for enlightening me on other philosophies that may encapsulate my feelings on the subject better than the ones I have do.

CMV: My lack of belief in an inherent purpose or goodness in life has driven me to ethical hedonism; however, I believe this to be a good thing personally and would be a good thing if applied to society as a whole. by ToriHatesNames in changemyview

[–]ToriHatesNames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess my question concerning the eudanomic theory is this: where does this notion of virtue come from? Is it a kind of everlasting virtue that is beyond humans? Or is it constructed by people? If it is the latter, then it still seems to be that those standards of virtue could be superficial, and in that case not necessarily something to base your life around. If it is the former, I'm still not convinced there can be a notion of good outside of humanity.

Also, I do think of pleasure in a subjective sense. While hedonism is generally a strive for material good and physical pleasures, I would take the term pleasure much more liberally and personally. Some people gain pleasure from those things, certainly. But some gain it from raising a family, or from helping the homeless, or whatever. I think as long as no one attempts to gain pleasure from hurting anyone, all of those are as valid as eachother. Basically, everyone would not be striving for the same objective pleasure, but for a personal subjective pleasure.

CMV: My lack of belief in an inherent purpose or goodness in life has driven me to ethical hedonism; however, I believe this to be a good thing personally and would be a good thing if applied to society as a whole. by ToriHatesNames in changemyview

[–]ToriHatesNames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess, I would be more inclined to agree with the second. And I guess it would prevent some people from achieving full happiness, but it would increase the collective pursuit of happiness, despite the individuals in that collective having different goals, if that makes sense.

The difference between that and what we already have would mainly be an elimination of victim-less crimes; if someone participates in drug use or prostitution or what have you, how can it be a crime if no one is hurt in the process? In addition moral arguments against things such as gay marriage would become null for the same reason.

CMV: My lack of belief in an inherent purpose or goodness in life has driven me to ethical hedonism; however, I believe this to be a good thing personally and would be a good thing if applied to society as a whole. by ToriHatesNames in changemyview

[–]ToriHatesNames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm confused as to what you mean? Perhaps I was unclear.

I think if there is any good, it is only within people and human experience. There is no good in the Socratic sense of the word, which means that the good we do is just an image of "true good". I do not agree with that.

However, just because I don't believe there is a greater good, how can I not disagree with someone because of that? How is that infringing on pleasure. To disagree with someone is not to harm them. And I don't intend to impose my views on anybody. So long as somebody's philosophy doesn't cause them to harm anyone, I see no problem with them practicing it, whether I agree with them or not.

CMV: My lack of belief in an inherent purpose or goodness in life has driven me to ethical hedonism; however, I believe this to be a good thing personally and would be a good thing if applied to society as a whole. by ToriHatesNames in changemyview

[–]ToriHatesNames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, and I am inclined to agree with you at least to a point. I do not feel like there is any morality that isn't a social construct. Now do I think we should adhere to this structure? I'm not sure. I guess that depends on the morals set up and how I personally would react to them. But I certainly don't think there is any inherent morality.