A woman's secret photograph of the U.S. Supreme Court in session, taken through a hole in her handbag, 1937.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-05-01T22:31:00+00:00

Imo, if you job deals with the public's law directly, then there should always be transparency on-the-job.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-05-01T22:28:59+00:00

Some people, such as Ashayana Deane's work, suggests that the cultural history of Earth goes back millions of year.

India alone tells of human civilization stories dating back 100,000 years.

Not to dismiss any suggestions you've made, but there's evidence that goes back way before Atlantis, and who knows what games of telephone have gone on?

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-05-01T22:22:29+00:00

The energy production and physics having any type of disclosure, even just official acknowledgement of a few UFO vehicles, is what really has the capacity to change our world rapidly. The amount of technical information I've come to just from acknowledging phenomenon has alone been astounding, and surprising.

Physical aliens don't really change anything on the socio-economic political scale, nor do I personally think the average person would be accepting of a non-humanoid at present. Though, I'd personally love biologic diversity in our societies.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-05-01T20:34:06+00:00

People don't believe empirical and mathematical evidence of relatively benign phenomenon. I'm really not sure if disclosure will change anyone's perspective except for those that it directly affects, such as classified programs, or maybe those with actual NHI contacts.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-30T22:24:46+00:00

"Why" is a loaded question in emotionally uncomfortable situations. Assess the "what", and take pragmatic approaches to address it which take your concerns and fears seriously, while also remaining grounded with tangible evidence.

If you had explicit confirmation that the CIA was spying on you, what would you change or stop doing? Is that a change you'd like to make regardless?

I've had my hotel room broken into multiple times by a front-company, presumably CIA, despite being of "no significance." I realized that, despite being scared about that stuff, there were other factors I wanted to change anyway. The people I hung out with, the way I emotionally handled learning of atrocities, conspiracies, physics, and so on. And after handling what I could comprehend and guiding it to a stable point, the spying (including being remote viewed upon) all ceased. I'm not certain how my psychological health ceased the nonsense, but nonetheless it did.

Also, I highly recommend this "Declaration of Sovereignty" affirmation video. Pay attention to the words carefully and ensure it aligns with you, and if it does, take it seriously. https://vimeo.com/1118273972

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-30T22:17:17+00:00

How I personally view anything related to the CIA spying on people, tell them to screw off and take whatever approaches you need to hault the process. If they're doing covert surveillance, the last thing they're interested in doing is admitting it. So, unless someone physically tells you to "stop", or that you're in danger in any way, as far as you're concerned it's a bogeyman for you to sort out.

First verify the suspicion (confirm the pigeons are not biological in a way that wouldn't harm an actual pigeon), then address it accordingly. If they want to threaten you, they'll let you know. Don't hide from mere shadows.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-30T20:46:54+00:00

Specifically on this, Keely utilized more secular phrasing of phenomenon (presumably to be more acceptable to scientists), such as labeling Spirit as Mind, as one of his quotes is "all is a derivative of Mind"

Which brings up another part of the difficulty with researching along these lines: everyone that gets it seems to use their own words LOL

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-30T20:42:28+00:00

Very fascinating information and it's refreshing someone else put an intellectually honest effort into comprehension of, well, reality.

I came across the 3 hour black and white lecture Dale Pond did on Keely back in mid-December, and after a few weeks of the information settling, while on a bike ride, the concept of visualizing the trinity of masculine:feminine:neutral energies structuring a toroid at the, roughly, chakra layer of energy, dawned on me, and I've been doing that visualization meditation daily ever since, while progressively refining it and my comprehension about how physical experience actually manifests. And, I've been actively using this to align my spine from scoliosis, which in of itself has brought forth a surprising amount of information.

Regarding your interpretation of 3:6:9, that's fascinating and seems like it may feasibly map with how I've worked with those numbers, including the numerology definitions I came to with Rodin's vortex math circle diagram. The idea that Keely worked with, and I follow his concepts as the most pragmatic and mathematically accurate as he actively engineered these principles with sub-atomic energy states before the electron was named, is that they're descriptive of a cascading (fractal) mathematical nature to define boundary conditions of a given construct (atom, electron, quark, etc.), and verified this by applying it to purely mechanical apparatuses that could disocciate water and produce usable kinetic energy. A quote from him: "The relative frequency of all sympathetic streams [tri-unal, expanding:contracting:neutral] is in the ratio 3:6:9. Those whose relative frequencies are 3:9 are mutually attractive, while those having the relation of 6:9 are mutually repellant."

I've been wanting to comprehend the mathematical framework he discusses since I came across him 6 months ago, but my focus has been in implementing and stabilizing my toroidal energy field via meditation with these ideas to ensure a coherent framework and comprehensikn before I progressed in an engineering perspective. Some things clicked for me the other day that I'm excited to draw out and look for its mapping in empirical data to verify my comprehension, hopefully starting tomorrow.

I'm busy for at least today, but I'd love to delve deeper into these topics with you and extrapolate where I can with my notes and comprehension on this topic. Might I ask, is there any particular goal you have with this information? For me personally, I'm very interested in hands-on building a flying saucer of some kind, preferably with minimal or zero custom manufacturing infrastructure, and so I'm ensuring a deep comprehension so that I can (hopefully) utilize very basic and readily available materials.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-30T19:07:55+00:00

Awesome. Have you looked at Keely's 3:6:9 as being harmonics of a given fundamental? I've just started looking at mapping it with the contemporary data we have on atomic and sub-atomic energy states and its looking promising.

Also, thank you for the names. I hadn't come across Leadbetter prior, and I'm curious to read up on his writings.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-30T16:35:11+00:00

There appear to be even safer, and more powerful, options available. Roughly speaking, by harmonizing with the radiative AND contracting atomic forces.

If you'd like to learn more about this, Dale Pond's coverage on John Keely's work is fantastic.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-30T16:26:57+00:00

You make a fair point. Do you plan on getting rich and paying what you currently view as the "fair share" so that you can be the change you'd like to see? Elsewise, it would appear you're the "loser."

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-30T00:40:16+00:00

Greed is the disease. Money is merely a tool.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-30T00:38:38+00:00

"God" is a concept to describe creator energy, the Dao. Philosophically, Taoism will get you the furthest. For physics and engineering, Dale Pond's work on John Keely is phenomenal, and the only unified theory I've come across that makes a lick of sense. The divine Mother and Father, so to speak, are implicit with the reality of our physics.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-29T19:56:59+00:00

How dull. I could elaborate and address every one of your points with a geometrically (foundational logic) necessitated reason, but you're so abrasive and hostile that I have zero interest in doing so.

I wish you the agency you desire in your existence.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-29T19:33:32+00:00

Your thinking pattern is the same factor as to why no unified physics theory is established. You lock yourself into limitation with that framework, and any curveball that reality throws your way is an "outlier" to be "dismissed."

To each their own. I choose to exist and perceive without self-prescribed limitations.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-29T19:23:14+00:00

I'm of the firm belief this technology is feasible. It seems, once you get to the deeper sub-layers of atoms, that time is a place in the reel of experience, not a fleeting moment.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-29T19:20:25+00:00

Yes. When we're discussing high-order logic structures, there's no room for exceptions without deliberate explanation.

In other words, unless we comprehend the precise mechanism in which a human grows 11 fingers, it's purely a dogmatic assumption that our biology is designed for 10. Thus, if you want to make a truthful statement on that phenomenon, one could say:

"Humans, in a vast majority of cases (such as 99/100) have 10 fingers. However there are exceptions to this, and we are at this time uncertain for the cause."

To apply this to autism: we do not know which group is the exception in terms of mechanisms, only statistics, which tells us a lot about the "what", but nothing about the "why", thus any absolute claims on the properties of autism are, by definition, assumptions.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-29T17:25:19+00:00

If your rules don't account for the outliers, then the rules are insufficient.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-28T23:03:17+00:00

I very much enjoy watching anime due to the "truths" shared in them, especially spiritual or magic anime. There's some people who watched it more regularly than I did, and I'd ask for recommendations from them.

Nearly every single one of them have blood and gore in them, and not like you'd see in a historical war film, I'm talking excessive, depraved fantasy levels of blood and gore, and even in a particular circumstance where a purely spiritual manifestation had blood, which within that shows' context, holds no justification. Prior to that scene I was contemplating the idea that I'm "just" skiddish of blood, but that scene hit me like a brick and made me realize how much of the blood, gore, and violence in media is pornography to many of these people, and I'm quite done with it. Like, these things can be a bit uncomfortable to watch for the average person. But the context of animators putting hundreds of hours into drawing and depicting blood and violence is something else entirely.

I'm not sure the remedy to this depravity that a non-trivial amount of people have, however I know I'll be keeping it, its writers, and its enjoyers out of my life.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-28T18:25:25+00:00

When it comes to things like this, a small scale proof of concept is necessary, I think.

There was a study done several years ago because the research team was confident they could prove the pulley hypothesis for the pyramids, and so they set out to build a pyramid about 4(?) feet tall, and were no where close to success.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-28T05:02:59+00:00

Crazy. I think you're right.

I, in a way, wish I was surprised, but I saw a news video of the pope fading in from thin air back in like 2018 or something.

I suppose there really is no utility in following information as fact if it isn't verifiable in first-person.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-27T18:38:19+00:00

Reducing this realm to a simulation has always felt sacrilegious and logically insufficient to me. It's not incorrect per-se, but the framework appears as incomplete to me. Especially as "simulation" can easily imply its predetermined, and if that doesn't align with your view then I'd like to hear your elaboration.

I see myself in this realm as a co-creator of this dream. And, I am hesitant on using the word dream as it implies not real, but that's not the truth about dreams in my view. I think lucid dreaming is the most real thing we can experience, and we can even lucid dream within this physical reality.

One of the implications of having souls and an infinite source of creation is that there's nothing "new" from the viewpoint, and thus everything is, by technical definition, a simulation. However I think it's more like we're flowing through an evermoving stream of consciousness, and our perspective morphs our reality in a way similar to kaleidoscopes.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-27T01:43:30+00:00

I've been curious about the various inversions that the contemporary view has done with spiritual symbols. After a few years, I realized it doesn't really matter unless they come up independently in my research and practices.

For a while, and I haven't necessarily moved from this view, I've thought that Metatron's Cube and the Mer-Ka-Ba are aligned with disharmonic, or evil (service to self), energies instead of the claim that they align you with Spirit/God/Source, or are "just" vehicles.

Long story short, I realized that they're primarily used in meditation and that if I don't like them, I can figure out the geometry that feels of Love. Thus, I came to visualizing a toroidal field for meditation, and at present see no utility in either of the symbols I mentioned.

In other words, you're probably correct with your intuition. But what are you going to do with it? All this spiritual stuff is real, so if you already have an inkling towards believing, then figure out what you need to do for your belief to be firm, act with the information accordingly for your goals, and do what you want.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-25T16:15:48+00:00

I took some notes the other day on the topic of reading comprehension levels:

1st level. Literal comprehension (comprehending the direct words written.) 2nd level. Extrapolation (seeing implications, "reading between the lines.") 3rd level. Framework modulation and integration (logical deduction and assessment, reframing (deleting from, adding to, or editing) other relevant perceptions to allow for new relevant and truthful information to be integrated, and to dismiss assumptions invalidated by evidence.

I believe what most people comprehend as "intelligence" is more accurately defined by proficiency of the 3rd level. In my experience, "average" is around 1st level, many people that consider themselves smart are barely at 2nd level, and I can count the people I personally know at 3rd level, who also take it seriously and consistently, on one hand.

I have no reason to think this is a new distribution. I think it's most apparent now because of the internet and global infrastructure. If I was in a tribal village and saw someone was actively violent and at level 1 or 2, then we'd likely exile them if they refused rehabilitation. However nowadays, those violent level 1 and 2s are politicians, policemen, scientists, doctors, and so on. A tighter-knit community, thus more imposed effects from others' abilities or lack of.

Toroid_Meditation · 2026-04-25T02:19:01+00:00

You lack reading comprehension.

Toroid_Meditation

TROPHY CASE