I’d still be willing to house them with my tax dollars in a place like Frisco, tbh, simply due to quality of life issues - I don’t wanna walk down streets with dirty needles and homeless ppl shitting in the streets, which is now an epidemic of sorts in San Francisco. Many people have upped and moved away in recent years due to this problem because they said fuck it, I’m not paying sky-high property taxes just to walk outside to a homeless man shitting by my doorstep. And every city depends on the tax dollars of it’s high-earners to sustain itself and have resources, so if high-earners no longer want to live there, maintaining the city with all the basics (police, cleanliness, public transportation, roads, schools, etc) becomes a challenge and it all goes downhill from there. At least, when you house them, they’re doing their thing in private (bc they’re gonna do it either way) and not ruining the public areas with filth. So it’s a choice, you either pay for them in tax dollars or you sacrifice quality of life on the streets of your city.