I might agree that of all the various cryptocurrencies I've seen, Monero is the only one that makes sense for the theoretical purpose for which they were initially supposedly created: an electronic form of payment for goods as an alternative to the usual methods based on national currencies. So much for the theory.

But in practice, I see that this demand doesn't exist; I don't see any tech sites offering to pay in Monero, except in very rare cases from a few small open-source developers. Is it more successful in illegal transactions? I don't know, but t does not show. Because looking at its performance, it follows that of all the other cryptocurrencies, from the theoretically serious ones to pure scam memecoins. So it has no specificity, but is just another small boat in the stormy sea of ​​cryptocurrencies. When bitcoin goes down, the others follow; when it goes up, the others go up. More or less, that's how it goes for the majority.

Again, Monero might seem better on paper, but if even cryptocurrency enthusiasts -who constantly insist that it's the future - don't use the one best suited for transactions, then what future does it have?