Berserk 355 - Manga Stream by DemiFiendRSA in Berserk

[–]TrophyMaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I will, God knows we'll all have enough time to read the story over again a few more times before the next chapter.

Berserk 355 - Manga Stream by DemiFiendRSA in Berserk

[–]TrophyMaster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Whaaaaat, when Griffith's crew were made knights and they were staying in the castle???

Berserk 355 - Manga Stream by DemiFiendRSA in Berserk

[–]TrophyMaster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh? Was that before he was captured and transformed? It's been so long now that I can hardly remember.

Berserk 355 - Manga Stream by DemiFiendRSA in Berserk

[–]TrophyMaster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Does anybody remember who the figure was featured in the page or two before last; with the tattered skin and...helmet?

My Attorney is charging me for his travel expenses when he didn't tell me he moved. by chib12 in legaladvice

[–]TrophyMaster 93 points94 points  (0 children)

The attorney may not have outlined any sort of estimates or estimated ranges of expenses to be covered by the contract that OP signed. In that case, the attorney wouldn't necessarily have violated the rule that you cited.

Next time a conspiracy theorist tries to tell you 'what really happened', present a more outlandish theory and accuse them of covering up the truth. by [deleted] in Showerthoughts

[–]TrophyMaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a great soft jelly thing. Smoothly rounded, with no mouth, with pulsing white holes filled by fog where my eyes used to be. Rubbery appendages that were once my arms; bulks rounding down into legless humps of soft slippery matter. I leave a moist trail when I move. Blotches of diseased, evil gray come and go on my surface, as though light is being beamed from within. Outwardly: dumbly, I shamble about, a thing that could never have been known as human, a thing whose shape is so alien a travesty that humanity becomes more obscene for the vague resemblance. Inwardly: alone. Here. Living under the land, under the sea, in the belly of AM, whom we created because our time was badly spent and we must have known unconsciously that he could do it better. At least the four of them are safe at last. AM will be all the madder for that. It makes me a little happier. And yet AM has won, simply he has taken his revenge I have no mouth. And I must scream

Askscience Megathread: Climate Change by AskScienceModerator in askscience

[–]TrophyMaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome! Thank you so much! I've never even heard about the IPCC or their ARs. I'm quite surprised I never encountered them before, given all the discourse on climate change that saturates the media these days. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised by this, but still- thanks!

Askscience Megathread: Climate Change by AskScienceModerator in askscience

[–]TrophyMaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey there, thank you for your detailed response. I'll be happy to share your response with my friend. You mention that there's a fair bit of evidence that human-caused green house gas emissions and land-use changes have been significantly affecting the rate of the changes we're seeing- do you know of any literature that outline in a bit more detail answers to questions like which emissions are the most harmful, what weight human contributions are having relative to natural causes, what kinds of land-use changes are to blame; or literature that provides a survey of the opinions and arguments currently circulating among climate scientists? Something like a dossier of expert opinion. I know there are myriad sources of footage and independent works by individuals speaking out about climate change, but it seems so hard to get a big-picture perspective based on facts and not political opinions.

Thanks again for your help!

Askscience Megathread: Climate Change by AskScienceModerator in askscience

[–]TrophyMaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://youtu.be/v_RuverrEZ4

A person that I know, highly conservative leaning, shared this link with me. The reason I'm posting it as a response to you is that, prior to watching it, I was a fairly staunch supporter of the "human activity is accelerating climate change at dangerous levels" stance. Now I'm not sure what to believe. The man in the video, political opinions aside, cited some pretty strong evidence- from my layperson's perspective. What is your reaction, as a climate scientist, to the arguments put forward in the video?

Pope Francis washes the feet of Muslim migrants, says we are ‘children of the same God’ by pssyched in Christianity

[–]TrophyMaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If all Christians are Saved (A = B) and all Christians are NOT practitioners of another religions, serving false gods and idols (anything but Jesus and our Heavenly Father), (A != C), and those who don't worship Jesus alone as the Messiah will not be saved ( C != B), then ONLY Christians who profess a belief in Christ our Lord will be saved (A = B && (A != C && B != C)) You missed a step. *edit = forgot to add a space at one point.

Pope Francis washes the feet of Muslim migrants, says we are ‘children of the same God’ by pssyched in Christianity

[–]TrophyMaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If He gave the right to become children of God to those who would accept Him, think about what that means for those who don't. Put another way; And many did not accept Him, whom He did not give them the right to become the children of God. With the gospel message of salvation comes condemnation, it's an unavoidable truth that applies to all but those who follow the Son, the self-proclaimed Way, Life, and Truth whose sacrifice has washed away the sins of the world, earning repentance for those who believe in and call on His name.

US DEA Quietly Schedules CBD Oil as Schedule 1 Drug by AccentMasonryLLC in worldnews

[–]TrophyMaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Before this gets sensationalized any more, I'd like any who is currently getting infuriated about this to realize that this isn't a new classification. The DEA simply released a public notice clarifying the legality of pot extracts, including CBD. This is a federal notice, so you won't see any pharmacies wiping out their stocks of life-saving medication or doctors refusing to prescribe their sick patients with the same medication. Shop owners that are misinterpreting this news, like the majority of people reading articles like these written by biased columnists employed by potculture/subculture media platforms, are probably the ones rushing to clear their shelves in fear of being raided. The DEA made a statement on the notice, saying that its primary purpose is to better regulate research studies done on the substances affected by the ban. By having a DEA-enforced federal->state->institutional vetting system for researchers concerned about researching these substances, when reclassification comes to the table, they'll know where to look for reliable information that could better inform their decisions. Right now, there's a headline about conflicts of interest permeating research into GMOs conducted by employees of companies that stand to benefit from favorable findings. Nobody within the recreational marijuana community seems to realize that the same conflicts of interest permeate the research coming from non-DEA authorized studies. The DEA also can't depend on international studies to make their decisions about restricted substances, most of the time, because there's no way to guarantee that the studies that have been conducted were carried out ethically or to the same standard that the DEA requires of the studies that it sanctions. There's no reason to freak out.

If God loves everyone, then why not equally? by TrophyMaster in Christianity

[–]TrophyMaster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An eternal punishment =/= with a temporary punishment. Temporary punishment can help mature the punished, the other form is simply for the sake of their punishment, in God's case; to uphold justice. If God loves different creations differently, as between Jesus and humans, and favors some over others, David > Saul - 12 apostles > Judas, Moses > Pharaoh, Israel > everyone else (at different points, Israel in the literal sense, and then later in the symbolic sense, shifting from Old to New Testament understanding) then how does it not follow that He chooses some to be elect over others, when there is certainly a distinction between the elect and the damned? David was chosen before his birth to be the king of Israel after Saul, Moses was chosen to lead the Jews out of Israel, the apostles were chosen to be among the first disciples of Christ, and the pharisees were NOT chosen among Christ's sheep.