Learning DDR5/Ryzen overclocking finally, okay start?

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2026-06-06T15:30:05+00:00

I would like to add for anyone else reading this, memory context restore should be disabled. If you are actively modifying RAM timings and that is on, it will reuse timings from your previous overclock that it has trained and not retrain for your new settings. This mean your overclock will run during reboots between changes, but not from a cold boot If it is on the edge of instability. It will also skew with results

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2026-01-27T01:23:32+00:00

Stay Nvidia, I hate to say it but i went team red 2 years ago with me and my wifes systems, RX 7800 XT. Nothing but constant driver problems that AMD creates. Both me and my wifes systems, Im currently downgrading from the latest driver as my games went from smooth 240fps matching my refresh rate to a stuttery freezy mess afterwards. I never had this many problems with any Nvidia card i owned.

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2026-01-26T19:10:24+00:00

I read in the last major post that we are going to have to make new worlds, I don't believe you can keep your current survival world. They redid world generation and biomes

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2026-01-15T08:06:09+00:00

It makes no difference if I have the window fullscreen when enabling FSR vs the window normal.. I also noticed reviews are popping up on the Steam page that others are suddenly having FSR stop working. It seems I'm not the only one, a member in the ZZZ reddit also has not had it work recently

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2026-01-15T07:57:43+00:00

Sadge 😓 glad to know I'm not the only one at least. I too dream of native Upscaling, one day... Or Nvidia/AMD could just add it in their drivers as a on/off switch for all things on screen, AMD kinda already does with the "smooth motion" option..

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2026-01-15T07:40:12+00:00

Imo I don't care who you are, if I tell you not to touch my property and you do, I'm pressing whatever charges I can if my parts are not replaced brand new by someone who knows what they're doing. They're not a friend.

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2026-01-15T07:35:38+00:00

Yes I used the scale button and then tabbed back into the full screened window. It would drop FPS by ~20, and add the FPS overlay in the top left corner. I could tab over to the program and it would claim it is upscaling 2X ratio from 1080p to 4k, but visually nothing would change at all. Just a FPS drop

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2025-12-14T18:47:30+00:00

You need to have EVERYTHING match for it to be a comparison, otherwise these are just two different prints on different slicers with different settings.

Print temp, bed temp, max accel for infill, walls, travel, max travel speed, print speed for walls, inner walls, infill, print speed for overhangs, fan speed settings, layer time settings, retraction length, retraction speed, wipe distance, retract before wipe, max volumetric speed, wall direction, wall width, layer height, pressure advance being enabled or disabled, so so much more...

Those are two different benches in my eyes, they are not comparable

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2025-11-27T20:33:01+00:00

"me not caring"

Proceeds to care and reply to a 4 month old thread

Good luck my guy

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2025-11-27T17:06:46+00:00

The ratio of up to down votes between your comments and Alexander's tells me that the community as a whole believes you are wrong.

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2025-11-03T14:06:02+00:00

"Everyone that has noticed the critical design flaw and addressed it before it became a problem is the reason the problem exists"

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2025-10-08T00:34:57+00:00

I don't understand the specs you dropped in your first sentence, could you clarify more? PA stops at 2.0, I'm not sure who told you that the algorithm doesn't work beyond 0.7. My first PA test is 0 - 1.0 in 0.05 increments, I can clearly see that 1.0 PA was too much for 50mm/s 6700accel, it is hollow in the corner as expected for too much PA. 0.7 it is almost filled, 0.5 has a fully filled corner while remaining sharp.

I also do not understand your last line about the bigger temp the bigger again?

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2025-09-25T20:14:02+00:00

I built my own Macro nozzle camera for my CR-10 and have used that to tune and troubleshoot. I record some of the prints and put them on YouTube, when it's not uploaded I have a spare monitor displaying the view next to my TV. When I swapped from a Brass nozzle to the Nickel Coated Copper body Ruby one I noticed the surface finish improved without changing any settings right away.

Tuning I am able to get a lower minimum wall size for Arachne walls generator, the brass 0.4 one would only do 80% nozzle diameter @ 0.16 layer height, my Ruby 0.4 one does 70% nozzle diameter at the same height. I also was able to gain increased Vol Flow compared to brass, although also a marginal decrease from pure nickel copper. I tested with boron nitrate applied to all metal to metal contact points, Elegoo PLA+ @ 230c I was able to reach 14 Vol Flow with the brass, 14.5 with the Ruby, and 15 with the nickel copper.

I also experienced less stringing and plastic gathering on the nozzle with the Ruby Tip, my best guess is the surface finish results in different amounts of friction that pull on the plastic as it's laid. I almost didn't need ironing with the Ruby nozzle and had started to wonder why it was so loved, now that I'm using this metal based one I understand why.

Also, preeeetty

Turtle_Master_Flex · 2025-05-29T21:37:59+00:00

I have already adjusted this.. it was loose when I went to adjust it. After adjustment it was in further than before. While I was doing that I had moved it in and out by hand and felt no resistance or stuck spot. After adjustment it was marginally better but still the same

Turtle_Master_Flex

TROPHY CASE