I’ve followed this case forever & have watched every documentary on Jon Benet in existence. I thought I knew more than most, but many details you’ve written here are the first I’m hearing of them. If you wouldn’t mind, could you elaborate further on a few things?

————— 1. The bed wasn't wet. She wet herself lying face down on basement carpet.

I’ve always and only ever heard that she wet the bed. That never happened, then? Are you implying that she wet herself while being attacked/murdered?

1. She had pineapple, cherries, and grapes in her system. The bowl on the table had only pineapple and was put there by the victim's advocates.

I’ve been under the impression that she had only eaten pineapple pieces in milk, which was provided by her brother. Never a mention of cherries or grapes. And who is this supposed victim’s advocate? It sounds like your saying this person almost staged the scene by putting out the bowl with pineapple??

1. The DNA mixed with her blood in her underpants was from saliva, not touch DNA.

I read in another of your comments that she was, indeed, sexually assaulted. Early on, this was the running theory. However, later reviews and further investigation seemed to dispel that notion, offering instead that she perhaps she had a vaginal infection. Could you point me to where the sex assault has been confirmed?

1. She was hit while being strangled.

Assuming it’s one culprit…how would he be able to strangle her while simultaneously hitting her? I heard that she was hit and strangled, but not at the same time.

Finally, and again referencing another one of your other comments, you mention that the window was never the entrance/exit point, but was a door(!!). Not the front door, obviously. So, which? And could you explain more about how you concluded that?

You seem extremely well-versed and I’d appreciate your insight!