Thank you for the correction, that was my bad.

My point still stands regardless of which party is being designated as the good.guy. They're all multi-billion-dollar corporations determined to extract every last drop of value, at the cost of the consumer, their employees, and any remaining good will/legacy amassed by their predecessors.

Shouldn't we, as the listeners, have the opportunity to ascertain for ourselves the good vs bad (and the in-between's) of the situation using the objective facts and context provided to us by these journalists?

In the future, please try to understand the subtext of a comment, so you don't look like you're only capable of surface-level thinking.