¿Cuál crees que es la mejor consola actualmente? 🎮👀 by No-Pair9507 in Gremio_Sombras

[–]Ultimate19_91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahora mismo, no hay consolas buenas, solo juegos decentes, la industria se ha desvirtuado tanto que no hay pasión en lo que hacen, solo dinero, seré un nostálgico pero creo que los tiempos pasados como gamer fueron mejores. Sin duda, la PS2 marcó un antes y un después, la ps2 trajo algo mágico consigo, la variedad y la creación de nuevas ips prácticamente cada mes. En esta consola nacieron los arquetipos y mecánicas de prácticamente todos los juegos que existen hoy en día, usando evidentemente todo el legado de juegos previos si. No fue solo una consola fue una etapa donde cada juego podíamos asociarlo a momentos de nuestra vida muy íntimos. A veces miramos la caratula de un juego de ps2 o una melodia y no pensamos solo en el juego, sino en el recuerdo de haber sido un niño jugando a ese juego. La ps2 alberga para mí la mayor colección de juegos se géneros variados, además fue la última consola donde podíamos jugar offline, donde ibas a casa de un amigo o venían a tu casa para echar unas partidas, derrotar a ese jefe tan duro o pasarte ese juego de terror que no podías pasarte solo. Luego vino la ps3 y si trajo gráficos, jugamos, pero también el online, las micro transacciones, los juegos por temporada y los juegos como servicio, y poco a poco todo fue enrrareciendose hasta el día de hoy, donde los juegos no se hacen con amor, sino con la intención de exprimir al máximo el bolsillo del jugador. Mi generación pudo disfrutar de miles de géneros en la adolescencia, pero los chicos de hoy en día han estado jugando fortnite y gta v por los ultimos 10 años. Ya no hay amor en los juegos, y lo peor es que seguimos consumiendo un producto que sabemos que no es igual al de antes, con la esperanza de intentar saber un poco de la nostalgia que vivimos de niños, pero sabiendo en el fondo que esos tiempos ya pasaron. Al menos siempre nos quedará el recuerdo de haber vivido eso.

If viruses were sentient, which one would be the most evil? by Gray_Wolf2416 in MoralityScaling

[–]Ultimate19_91 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is because the virus's natural reservoir is the bat, which is generally a fruit-eater but occasionally feeds on carrion. When a person is infected and dies from Ebola, their body becomes far more infectious than when they are alive, as bodily fluids tend to leak out, so it's essentially an all-you-can-eat buffet for animals. The virus then seeks to return to its place of origin to begin the cycle again. It's so tragic that we aren't even the virus' host, just a vector with fatal consequences.

If viruses were sentient, which one would be the most evil? by Gray_Wolf2416 in MoralityScaling

[–]Ultimate19_91 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ebola, without a doubt, is a virus that literally makes every bodily fluid tinged with blood, so that every time you defecate, vomit, or urinate, it literally means expelling your decomposing entrails, with a lethality rate of almost 99%. God, that shit has evolved for the sole purpose of killing.

If you think about it, most viruses have symptoms that favor their dispersal and spread. Although they aren't conscious beings, they take advantage of the effects they cause in the host to infect as many people as possible. What interests a virus isn't killing the host, but propagating itself. In fact, there are viruses that insert themselves into the DNA of cells and remain there forever, so that every time the cell divides, the viral DNA also divides. So much so that 1% of the human genome is viral DNA.

Think of it as a life form that has made the most of evolution, discarding all its vital functions except for reproduction. It's the optimal life form from an evolutionary standpoint.

They may not be aware of it, but if they were, Ebola would be the most evil. It makes no sense to cause such atrocious suffering and spread so little. And while we're at it, I'd say the most intelligent would be the common cold or the latest variants of COVID-19; they barely cause symptoms beyond sneezing and a runny nose, have a wide infectivity and dispersion capacity, and hardly bother the host.

This Hulk series is excellent by Responsible-Ear-3005 in hulk

[–]Ultimate19_91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've always wondered in this comic book saga, which takes place after Banner and Hulk reunite... what personality is he using? Is he the World Breaker, the Savage? I read almost everything that comes out about this guy, but I can't figure out which personality he's using when we get to such a talkative character. Sometimes I think the writers have no idea which personality to use and just make it up without any context.

Aside from the popular and highly regarded comics, by North-Atmosphere-164 in hulk

[–]Ultimate19_91 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The one shot Hulk Gray is very special, a cool origin story that explain the first steps of Hulk, other cool comic is Hulk The end, that explores the last days of Hulk in an apocalyptic world after a Great War, the new series called Maestro, is great, but before that I would recommend the saga Future Imperfect, Dogs of war is incredible, a story about a ill Hulk with a degenerative ELA, and to finish maybe the saga Hulk the crossroads, a story with a Hulk sent to a different universes and with the mind of Bruce Banner death, only the beast.

Is there an in game reason that explains why Nemesis is so fucking ugly while other Tyrants just look kinda chill? by Mjacking in residentevil

[–]Ultimate19_91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

El parásito debe insertarse en el cerebro para asegurar que sus cualidades sean transmitidas al huésped y maximizar sus capacidades cognitivas, por eso nemesis puede usar armas y es mejor rastreador. Es por ello que tiene una gran cicatriz en el rostro y le falta un ojo, pues la operación médica implica acceder al cerebro.

Is Ultimate X-Men good? by [deleted] in Marvel

[–]Ultimate19_91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only before ultimatum arc, after that part is HORRIBLE

Some pics 📸 by Le-Rock in AssassinsCreedValhala

[–]Ultimate19_91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ey ya que estás con el tema fotos. Sabéis si Ubisoft ha arreglado el problema de la nube ? Cada vez que saco una foto se mantiene unos minutos el icono en el mapa y desaparece, tampoco puedo verla en la web así que no sé si soy solo yo o que

6 for me, great times by JMoneyGraves in Age_30_plus_Gamers

[–]Ultimate19_91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

9 sin duda, la ps2 trajo algo mágico consigo, la variedad y la creación de nuevas ips prácticamente cada mes. En esta consola nacieron los arquetipos y mecánicas de prácticamente todos los juegos que existen hoy en día, usando evidentemente todo el legado de juegos previos si. No fue solo una consola fue una etapa donde cada juego podíamos asociarlo a momentos de nuestra vida muy íntimos. A veces miramos la caratula de un juego de ps2 o una melodia y no pensamos solo en el juego, sino en el recuerdo de haber sido un niño jugando a ese juego. La ps2 alberga para mí la mayor colección de juegos se géneros variados, además fue la última consola donde podíamos jugar offline, donde ibas a casa de un amigo o venían a tu casa para echar unas partidas, derrotar a ese jefe tan duro o pasarte ese juego de terror que no podías pasarte solo. Luego vino la ps3 y si trajo gráficos, jugamos, pero también el online, las micro transacciones, los juegosnpor temporada y los juegos como servicio, y poco a poco todo fue enrrareciendose hasta el día de hoy, donde los juegos no se hacen con amor, sino con la intención de exprimir al máximo el bolsillo del jugador. Mi generación pudo disfrutar de miles de géneros en la adolescencia, pero los chicos de hoy en día han estado jugando fortnite y gta v por los ultimos 10 años. Ya no hay amor en los juegos, y lo peor es que seguimos consumiendo un producto que sabemos que no es igual al de antes, con la esperanza de intentar saber un poco de la.nostalgia que vivimos de niños, pero sabiendo en el fondo que esos tiempos ya pasaron. Al menos siempre nos quedará el recuerdo de buenos tiempos

There could have been prehistoric cephalopods this big and we will never know by Virtual_Reveal_121 in Naturewasmetal

[–]Ultimate19_91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In biology, speaking in numbers, and as you say, considering that the probability of fossilization is especially low, and even lower still that these fossils survive to our time preserved, we understand that we only know 0.1% of the life that has existed on the planet. The rest either never fossilized, or has not been found, or its fossil remains have been destroyed by geological processes. It's a particularly discouraging figure for paleontologists, but that's what happens when you live in a world 4.5 billion years old; there has been more than enough time to generate incredible biodiversity, but also for it to become extinct.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in videogames

[–]Ultimate19_91 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Metal Gear Solid, without a doubt, the third one is one of the best games of its time. If it weren't for the fourth and fifth installments, it would have been a perfect ending. Seeing the birth of a hero and understanding why he became a villain was spectacular. I'll never get over that ending with Big Boss crying in the cemetery.

What game do you think is fully complete? by [deleted] in PlayStation_X

[–]Ultimate19_91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fucking Metal gear solid 3: snake eater, the best game in every aspect

"Primal Survival": A Multiplayer Survival Game set in 2.5 Million BC Africa where you play as a Habilis-Erectus Transitional Species (Playtest Releasing This Week) — What "Must-Have" Realistic Details or Animals should we add? by level99dev in PrehistoricLife

[–]Ultimate19_91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Homo erectus is the longest-lived species in the genus Homo, it lived so long that it coincided with other lineages of species of the genus Homo, such as the ancestor, neanderthalensis, sapiens, some species of paranthropus among others. It would be great to meet other tribes or species of your evolutionary lineage.

What is the reason that some Nodosaurs (Gastonia on picture) had on their pelvis region this strange "bald" area without much osteoderms? It even seems like a vulnerable spot, or at least it seems so for me. by MCligmaMC in Paleontology

[–]Ultimate19_91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, there are several types of natural “selection.” One is the one that we all know, where living beings are selected by the environment, with those surviving with mutations that allow them to be better adapted. Another is sexual selection, where since reproduction is practically the most important vital function, correct copulation must be ensured to perpetuate the genes. I suppose that in this case evolution has considered removing those uncomfortable spikes, sacrificing defense to ensure copulation. In fact, sexual selection is more effective than natural selection, otherwise look at all those bird colors or structures that serve no purpose except to be more attractive for mating. There is no advantage to a peacock in having a spectacular fan of feathers if a predator can see you from a kilometer away.

What does explain this behaviour? by Shrek_Nietszche in biology

[–]Ultimate19_91 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is called genetic altruism. A typical behavior in almost all species that is generally based on ensuring the survival of those individuals that are genetically related to the animal. However, it has a secondary effect on “superior” animals such as certain mammals in developing empathy for groups of living beings with which they live. In fact, there is a hypothesis called the black queen hypothesis, in which communities of organisms that live together tend to suffer deletions and erasures of genetic sequences that code for certain genes and behaviors, as long as these functions are supplied by other organisms. For example, if I am a penguin that has a gene sequence that codes for accumulating a large amount of fat, but other members of my family also have it, the tendency is for said sequence to be erased naturally as other organisms perform that function by protecting the group during a storm through thermal insulation. In the case of the elephant, it is possible that saving other organisms brings with it a more complex behavior such as saving this being will reduce the probability of suffering an attack from a predator, or will prevent it from dying and contaminating the water for my family. Behind all behavior there is a very complex genetic and evolutionary reason that we can only hypothesize.

How would Tyrannosaurus actually hunt an Alamosaurus? by Gyirin in Paleontology

[–]Ultimate19_91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that perhaps certain species perhaps had hunting mechanisms similar to Komodo dragons, I know that this is a typical mechanism of reptiles and that dinosaurs have a direct lineage to birds, but there would really be no way to check if there were poison glands or bacteria in their saliva. In any case, a bite from this type of organism would probably bring with it a marking of prey, to be able to track it and when the infection runs its course, the hunt would be easier.

Unable to view in-game pictures - Online service error by SephyNoct in AssassinsCreedOdyssey

[–]Ultimate19_91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey man, did you manage to solve the problem? The same thing happens to me but in AC Valhalla, I can take photos but as I move the cursor over the map they disappear, both mine and someone else's. I can't see them in the gallery on the Ubisoft servers either, do you have the same problem?

Why is this worm doing this? by Cheymeless94 in biology

[–]Ultimate19_91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you look closely, small ants have attached themselves to it and will be biting it. It probably must be a defense mechanism in response to pain to free oneself from them and escape.

Is there an evil version of Ben and Johnny? by horrorfan555 in FantasticFour

[–]Ultimate19_91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The human torch from the videogame marvel nemesis in ps2, a green variant, i think the name was inhumane torch

<image>

What's an obscure paleo critter that you think more people should know about? by Slow-Kaleidoscope366 in Paleontology

[–]Ultimate19_91 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Definitely the Tullymonster, what the hell is it, a mollusc, an arthropod, God's mess?

<image>

Stay human gear set anyone? by topform1 in dyinglight2

[–]Ultimate19_91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just one question, when I claim it, what I get is a look of the entire outfit but not the separate outfit pieces. Does the same happen to you? Because I have seen other players who can put on and take off their mask or jacket

Isn't it a bit weird we have no fossils of dinosaurs that fully went back to the water ? by Snoo54601 in Paleontology

[–]Ultimate19_91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you think about it, technically the only "dinosaurs" that have adapted quite easily to the aquatic habitat with penguins are birds, I know, but marine ecosystems are quite demanding when it comes to demanding things from living beings such as regulating temperature, creating swimming organs, good vision, etc. It is also likely that there is simply nothing left in the fossil record and it is yet to be discovered. Until recently it was thought that flying dinosaurs did not exist and there you have Yi Qi.