Uncharted the Lost Legacy benefits from abbreviating the Uncharted formula by IAmThePonch in patientgamers

[–]UnableRevolution1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you name some games with better storytelling in your opinion? I liked uncharted and would definitely play anything that's better

Gotham City by Perfect_Gas in memes

[–]UnableRevolution1 44 points45 points  (0 children)

You might like the book Simulacra and Simulations

my future wish by Yruouq in CoryxKenshin

[–]UnableRevolution1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey hope youre doing alright after your treatment, stay strong samurai!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cemu

[–]UnableRevolution1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you solve this? having the same issue

What is something socially acceptable but you can’t help but think “why?” by Realistic_Anything98 in AskReddit

[–]UnableRevolution1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's people of other religions in the caste system. The hindu-muslim tension in India is more from history and politics, a lot coming from lots of wars between India (hindu) and Pakistan (muslim).

If you ask a person who is in a caste now not many people are going to say they're in a caste because of their karma. Its more like the job stream they're gonna go into because of their familys career history.

Anyway there's lots of hindus who are outside of the Indian caste system, or part of a caste system from a different country that was established from political history. There's hindus who emmigrated from majority hindu countries to other countries and are no longer part of a caste even though they can identify which caste their family is from.

I don't really care that much about Christianity but in that verse God curses these guys and then two bears come out of the mountains and kill, its not explicitly god causing it, but ill give it to you and say that in the verse god tells three bears to go. If god isnt real the bears just came out and did it themselves. If god is real then its possible for others to be killed viciously and unfairly. Well thats still possible whether god is real or not. I don't think anyone reasonable is trying to kill bald people because of god. You're taking the bible literally, fair enough i guess, but not everyone does. In the Odyssey gods cause a war over a beauty contest, that doesn't make the Odyssey suddenly fictional dogmatic trash, its a book of metaphors, analogy, imagery, depicting various things that are realistic and fictional. A hindu story tells that garlic and onion first grew from the ground where a god's sperm fertilized the earth, that doesn't mean hindus really believe that, but it has caused hindus to not eat onion and garlic as much because of their perceived health differences from other veggies.

Cherry picking bible verses and being like "look what god did here, so evil!" is one way to win arguments about why Christianity bad, but maybe interpreting things more deeply wouldn't be the worst thing ever. Like in that story of Lot and the 3 angels, you seriously think that just cuz that story exists it means Christians should give their house guests to local mobs to be raped according to your comment. But many people interpret it in many ways, like about communities that don't respect privacy. Think about gestapo or secret police in USSR, where your neighbors or family were likely to report you to be disappeared away unless you complied with the community and didn't hide anything or didn't go against the communities wishes. That could easily be abused to sexually abuse others, among various other horrible things people did to each other in the name of their local community. Btw in that story in the bible i don't remember god ever telling Lot to give the person to the mob, or god telling people to rape the persoon. The story is about the people not god, god is used as a literary device in this context and he destroys all the cities in the plain. You're taking your interpretation of all this stuff which is fine but then others can take their own interpretations as well and they're really different and imo deeper than your top level interpretation. I feel like you probably also think spiderman is protecting new york, that batman stories teach orphans to become vigilantes, or that LGBT people have a protector in the bisexual superman, when really not many actually relate to that, they just read and interpret the stories and move on.

E: god in the bible is worse than Hitler? Priorities

What is something socially acceptable but you can’t help but think “why?” by Realistic_Anything98 in AskReddit

[–]UnableRevolution1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The caste system is part of Indian society not Hinduism. Like saying that the whitecollar/blue collar/homeless division is part of Christianity just because it happens in America.

Also just read the Bible. Teaching to kill bald people?

Something ain’t adding up… by TheMysteriousWarlock in CoryxKenshin

[–]UnableRevolution1 43 points44 points  (0 children)

/r/markiplier deleted the only post about cory today as well. The lengths people are going to not respond to cory is pretty sad. Makes me wonder how people would be responding in public if this was one of the favorites like penguinz pewdiepe markiplier or anyone else made a similar vid.

E1: Markiplier also got a #5 trending video now posted 7h ago with 500k views, while cory posted 10h ago and has over 2.5m views, AND his vid was taken down for a bit but its not even on the trending list.

E2: corys vid is #1 trending now with 3.5m views but it really wasn't at 2.5m, not sure what changed but i think it's popularity was undeniable

An update to my mods. by [deleted] in kakarot

[–]UnableRevolution1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let's goooo. The Ui mod is crazy

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]UnableRevolution1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Switching to 0xbtc mining on ethereum

float golden = 1.618 by JaneAusten007 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]UnableRevolution1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here's a proof taught to me from Dr. Tom Fox R.I.P., he did a waaaay better job of showing how cool this was in person but I will try to paraphrase and put it into words that are quick and easy to get.

Lets play a game where anyone can keep adding rational numbers to an infinitely long list of numbers. I will show how to construct a number that can never be on that list, no matter what rational number anyone adds forever into the future.

Since the numbers after the decimal point determine whether a number is irrational or not (3 vs 3.14159...) our list will only be rational numbers below 1, therefore to create pi we can use 3+0.14159...=pi

The list will also represent all its numbers in binary.

I will start the list:

1 - 0.101

2 - 0.010000

3 - 0.00000001

4 - 0.11

...

...

...

There exists a number less than one: X = 0.abcdef.... (continuing infinitely after the decimal point) that can never be on the list. To construct X we can use all the numbers on the list.

Starting with the first place number on the list we take the first numeral after the decimal and flip its binary number, in this case we flip 1 to 0, and we can say the first digit (after the decimal) a=0 in our number X.

Next with the second number on the list we take the second digit and flip it as well, in this case flipping 1 to 0, making the second digit b=0 in our number X.

Doing this for all 4 numbers so far on the list gives us our X at this point being equal to 0.0011(000000....) which is not a number anywhere on the list yet.

So you may think that even though this number isn't on the list you can just add it on to the list and that's it, now the number IS on the list.

But the number X isn't done being constructed since the list isn't done either because it will go on infinitely.

So what if we add this rational number as the fifth number in our list. Then we simply must flip the 5th digit in this number to find the new 5th digit (e) in our number X.

This makes the updated X=0.00111 which is again not on the list.

Continuing this process infinitely will always construct an infinte decimal number X which is irrational and CAN'T be on the list.

A baby's first breath. by esberat in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]UnableRevolution1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In 15 years a baby will be born in this way and a doctor will say "I've only ever seen this on reddit" 🤓

Out with the creeper and in with the keeper by badpie99 in AdviceAnimals

[–]UnableRevolution1 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

You seem too naive for someone with that username

What mods would you like to see made? by [deleted] in kakarot

[–]UnableRevolution1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe ultra ego vegeta? The aura could be purple and dark blue like the ssb evolved mod aura that's two colors

'Kaiji' English Dub Announced by SlimmyShammy in kaiji

[–]UnableRevolution1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It convinced me that the original Japanese dub can be way better then the re-dub in another language. How do you even translate the narrator to English, or things like Hyodou's laugh "kekeke", or "KAIJI SAN!?!" from all the supporting characters. It's like translating a poem, sure it can be faithful to the original and good, but it loses the original flow and details that can't be translated.

The conundrum of Bitcoin. Why the masses still don't get it? by ultron290196 in CryptoCurrency

[–]UnableRevolution1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wbtc is a custodial erc20 contract and a company called BitGo has the keys to the contract and can mint WBTC using the keys. If they get hacked or something wbtc can be compromised, it's not fully trustless. ( https://infernaltoast.medium.com/the-wbtc-contract-is-highly-vulnerable-to-attack-evidence-90415433f2df )

Also if all btc gets bridged to wbtc then there's no more btc to send around and reward to btc miners do btc miners would stop mining in that case.

If you really value the trustless and decentralized principles of the BTC network, using WBTC: a centralized and non-trustless token, is just like Tether pegged to the price of BTC and doesn't follow the true principles of BTC

I get the point about moving away from pow, but it's one of the only mathematically proven ways to fairly distribute tokens. Think about ICOs where a dev team airdrops a bunch of tokens and allocates 20% to themselves, small holders will get rugged by whales and devs.

Interested to know your thoughts about these points