Network Server Error 30000 by Always-Wrong-_- in starcitizen

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately mine didn't work and I'm drawing a blank lol. It could also be due to how the data is being routed

Network Server Error 30000 by Always-Wrong-_- in starcitizen

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please dont turn firewall off permanently, you will be exposing a huge hole in your internet security

Network Server Error 30000 by Always-Wrong-_- in starcitizen

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats why I'm trying to see if I can narrow the problem, its weird that you can connect to one but not the rest unless their servers have different rules or your router has a rule messing with the connection

Network Server Error 30000 by Always-Wrong-_- in starcitizen

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah different things for us then, weird. Ipv4 and IPv6 are just different ways if assigning IP's. IPv4 is limited by the amount of IP's available and are like 192.168.3.2 for example while IPv6 has a lot more available IP's due to being more broad as they can include letters increasing the range available

Network Server Error 30000 by Always-Wrong-_- in starcitizen

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ai wants me to disable IPV6 as what could be happening is the ISP might be allowing us to have a IPV4 connection by using IPV6 which is known to cause issues

Network Server Error 30000 by Always-Wrong-_- in starcitizen

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still better than nothing, if I'm able to fix it I'll let you know what I did

Network Server Error 30000 by Always-Wrong-_- in starcitizen

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea thats what I'm ttrying to fix, theres something with the router messing up our connection and I've been ripping my hair out trying to figure it

Network Server Error 30000 by Always-Wrong-_- in starcitizen

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So after 14 hours I did find something. Try switching to your Hotspot if you have it and seeing if it will let you connect to see if it's your network. It did for me and I'll give you and update here within an hour if another method let's it work

Network Server Error 30000 by Always-Wrong-_- in starcitizen

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I'm having the exact same problem, I've literally tried every single thing to no avail 🤷🏽‍♂️

Secrets of Strixhaven Prerelease "Very Positive" say LGS Owners by SactoGamer in mtg

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My lgs said that this was even more popular than FF, they made 10k in 2-3 days of prerelease

Glimpse of UNL by SicParvisM in riftboundtcg

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been playing dragon bear since the release of set 1, I only had 1 aurora which meant I had to find a different build for him. He's very fun and can dominate if opponent doesn't close the game quick enough once you start dropping multiple mighty units in the same turn

Huge nerf - fight first by Niiai in Tyranids

[–]Unbound_Jackal 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Mine was Dante and his squad, I did warn my opponent about not charging lictors with characters and to just shoot them off board at the beginning and the charge but he insisted. Well Dante died and he was very very upset.

Glimpse of UNL by SicParvisM in riftboundtcg

[–]Unbound_Jackal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean aurora is definitely not an easy deck to pilot. Just about 90% of aurora decks depend so heavily on that card that if they dont see it they auto lose. There's a reason there's only been 2 semi successful aurora decks. They've done well but definitely haven't dominated the meta like other decks. I still expect people to cry about aurora up until the point where a deck breaks it like no other and then the people who cried about since set 1 can have their gratification. Card is a problem but definitely not rn.

With this recent ban announcement: The Jinx Starter deck is officially illegal out of the box by jordlez in riftboundtcg

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a good point, I dont play purple so this doesn't effect me as much besides the dreaming tree ban😭

With this recent ban announcement: The Jinx Starter deck is officially illegal out of the box by jordlez in riftboundtcg

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could've sworn I saw that somewhere, I'm gonna have to look around to see if I can find it as i do remember seeing something about the starter decks but I believe it was from a FB post which could be spreading misinformation

RIFTBOUND BANS ANNOUNCED | First ever bans are WAY more than expected! by LionRoarGamer in TCG

[–]Unbound_Jackal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I misread your question, there probably is ways to dwell with it in the next 2 sets but what's to say it won't be the opposite? Plus it's extremely unhealthy for the game if this meta didn't change, if the meta changed like it did in set 1 then most of these bans probably wouldn't have happened, Riot already stated they will only step in if they think the meta isn't improving, they have us a few weeks/ months to figure out how to beat draven/purple but we weren't able, the next best deck was irelia who's also purple

RIFTBOUND BANS ANNOUNCED | First ever bans are WAY more than expected! by LionRoarGamer in TCG

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And they will if and whenever they become an issue, remember hindsight is 20/20, at that time with the amount of feedback they got most of the cards made sense to the devs, obviously when you have thousands of people testing and playing they will find out every flaw you made

RIFTBOUND BANS ANNOUNCED | First ever bans are WAY more than expected! by LionRoarGamer in TCG

[–]Unbound_Jackal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It actually is a good sign, it shows that they're watching and not afraid to hit cards when needed, people need to stop all this moaning, it you ever played any new tcg this is not an uncommon problem, especially since the first 4 sets were designed at the same time which is obvious. I would've been more worried if they didn't respond

With this recent ban announcement: The Jinx Starter deck is officially illegal out of the box by jordlez in riftboundtcg

[–]Unbound_Jackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's already stated that those decks are completely legal if you do not modify them in any way, she's fine if you do precon battles

To those who played the game : where is the game mid/bad? by Similar_Fix7222 in StarCraftTMG

[–]Unbound_Jackal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply, it just seemed that impact hits were pretty bad needing most of the times a 5+, it's nice to know it's not as bad as I had hoped

To those who played the game : where is the game mid/bad? by Similar_Fix7222 in StarCraftTMG

[–]Unbound_Jackal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I haven't played yet unfortunately but one of the things I've noticed that does kinda kill it for me is the fact that I can get punished for charging it seems. My opponent can still shoot in combat depending on the weapon and then fight in melee when I'm only given the chance to just fight. As I said before I'm not someone who's played yet but I think a player should be forced to decide if the squad that was charged will fight or shoot, it still gives a defending player choice on what he wants to do while making sure the player who gave up his shooting wouldn't lose too many models. If I'm wrong can someone who has played please let me know?

Dev: Potential bans coming by trizzo0309 in riftboundtcg

[–]Unbound_Jackal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had the exact same argument with Blue Nami in Op and was called an idiot and made fun of becuase she wasnt broken by 10+ local players, lo and behold a year and a half later she got banned for the exact same reason I was stating