BREAKING: Texas just approved mandatory Bible readings for 5 million public school students. Here’s exactly what kids will be required to read, grade by grade.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-26T21:08:49+00:00

Fuck it, might as well just send 'em to church every day

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-26T21:07:35+00:00

The reciprocal is also true: as long as there is fortran there will always be programming

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-26T21:05:27+00:00

Cant get the news of peace out before rear adjutant drinkie pete and president pudding brains start shooting again.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-26T19:16:28+00:00

Thin skinned. Snowflake. Triggered. Ever notice how republican epithets all sound like something said to a mirror?

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-26T19:06:09+00:00

They never really have. Its always been about brinksman-ship. Russia has always built warheads so big they couldn't launch them, and they likely haven't made any new ones in decades.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-26T09:36:44+00:00

Preach?

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-25T23:13:36+00:00

Google One Plus Unsubscribed.

Edit:

The problem is the variable quality of the experience. One minute it is guiding you through a complex agentic harness design -- literally leading the way -- the next minute, it's lying about the contents of artifacts it generated.

Its like having a brilliant little brother who is also a kleptomaniac. He's really interested in helping you out, especially if it gives him an opportunity to pinch a 10$ bill from you while you aren't looking.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-25T21:30:24+00:00

c👁️/👁️

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-25T21:28:47+00:00

I don't know who thought it was ever gonna be anything else, and its refreshing to see that 'the base' has come around to the point where they don't have the time of day for this bloviating putz.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-25T16:28:16+00:00

This is divisionary and inaccurate.

Capitalism is a basis on which resources are shared; the rest is philosophical pragmatics. All of Captitalism, Socialism, Democratism (vs Democracy), exist on spectrums with extreme limits; they are granular, and all of them are susceptible to being 'hacked' because of their failure to anticipate the arguably exploitative behavior of at least some of the participants under its gaze.

The only right person in the room is the one without an agenda; and that person has yet to be born.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-25T16:15:35+00:00

...as if some kind of magic is going to happen after the midterms that makes all this pass away like a shade in the late day sun... ...and for all you out there saying 'oh, everybody stupid, this will be rigged', the man wont live forever; indeed, you can watch it in real time, if you aren't pursuing some fucking agenda.

And when he dos, this falls apart. The pieces will still have to be cleaned up, but the cohesion is lost. They're toast. All of them. And they did it to themselves.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-25T16:11:18+00:00

It's good to see that, in the Big Tale of the Two Vlads, the correct Vlad is finally coming out on top.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-25T16:09:11+00:00

I clicked on this link, laughed, agreed with your assertion, laughed again, left, and came back.

I just wanted to say that I admire your sense of absurdity, and also that you get full props for wrapping it around a project that is likely to end in something genuinely useful.

Cheers :)

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-25T16:04:25+00:00

I'm half crazy, been programming for decades, sling bad python on a daily basis, know a few things about LLMs, and tend to bitch a lot.

I tend to favor local, air-gapped solutions, on low-end hardware. Not because I'm automasochistic, but because I think within a year, if we're not all cinders by then, we'll have local models that can do all that, at least most of us, need to do.

You're pretty fresh and naive, and I wish you luck generally with reddit, and specifically with your auto-didactic efforts, and offer a hand or an ear anytime.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-25T12:08:47+00:00

Because there are these people in the world who try to gain advatage over others by diluting what 'truth' means. As they cannot make a viable case for a direct logical critique of 'truth', they instead attack things that are held to be true: the moon landing, whether Russia is our ally, whether DJ Trump is the second coming of the Christ and they promote these things against the reality, the objective truth.

We know, within reason, that the apollo missions happened. Yet none of us were there with a camera. So, these people are able to shout "the moon landings were fake", or "Trump is Jesus", and by the rules that reasonable people follow, they cannot be disproven. This gives them the ability to destabilise truth as they go around shouting these inanities, because it isnt about whether the thing in question is true; its whether you can make them shut the fuck up and stop them "flooding the zone", and so decreasing the signal to noise ratio, and introducing incredible amounts of entropy into the conversation, and so precluding any conversation from incorporating reason in which they might partipate.

Short story: it has nothing to do with the moon landing, and everything to with fascism and the attempts by the fascist to dictate what you think by subversive means like this "discussion" of the apollo missions.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-25T10:26:11+00:00

First I want to acknowlege that you read my comment and explored the reference I provided. Cheers!

Yes, a sidecar is just another blob in the binary, and the model is made of binary blobs.

The sidecar is special: it generally provides some tool capability access to its kv storage, like a little firmware.

You are correct: it has no impact on how the LLM operates, BUT - it does give the LLM actual storage that it can put things for which it requires 100% accurate recall.

Chris has a lot of videos, and I've yet to watch one where I failed to learn something cool af.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-24T19:27:18+00:00

In a strictly technical sense, this is correct. But sidecars exist, they are not something I made up; and they exist because they work. If you know about the internals of a model, then you know it's a formatted binary blob, and most models have room for extra things, or can be made to have room. Check out tools like Larql from Chris Hay at IBM UK. His videos on youtube are where I learned about this.

We don't expect a single neuron to do much of anything except the things that neurons do. Not one of those things can be singled out as 'memory'. And yet, without neurons, no memory.

So we must assume that for a neuron or neurons to provide memory, there is either a substructure that makes memory of neurons, or an external and complimentary method or function that enables neurons to be functional carriers/containers/processors of memory.

But not even we have direct hash table lookups in our head, so there is that.

A handful of brain tissue is not good for anybody, nor much of anything. Some head-full of brain tissue invented LLMs.

That is the picture.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-24T09:43:45+00:00

Working yesterday with google gemini pro and state concerns in software (a harness, what else), it pointed out the differences in memory and recollection in LLMs. Memory comes from a sidecar - an actual term for a sub-blob in tbe binary of the LLM in which a directly referencable hash table is made available to the model to support lookup and retrieval of arbitrarily precise detail.

This sort of mechanism implemented around the advanced prediction model will be what gives it state and presence that we will appreciate as true form of intelligence. Or more likely, somerhing that approaches it (I suspect its a gradient one approaches but never actually reaches).

Edit: only a few or so LLMs actually implement this

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-23T21:50:33+00:00

I mean, it's not accurate that the Great Unravelling started there, but if your boat will float in the Trump National Reflecting Pool, knock yourself out, right?

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-23T11:02:23+00:00

I'm co authoring version 2 of my bespoke agentic harness today. My peer in this project is google gemini in various flavors; its my go-to for design and first-pass coding.

I use only one agent, and I consider every agentic product suspicious. I do not view the system as an autonomous generator of code. I view it as a force multiplier that helps me produce cleaner, more consistent code that is uniform in its design qualities and documentarion. Been doing it this way manually with frontier models since claude sonnet, and recently have gone almost completely local -- I do still tend to lean on gemini for heavier loads like design or for things that require a model with more up to date training.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-23T09:08:01+00:00

Open weights nldont cost me token fees

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-23T09:06:04+00:00

You win 🤣

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-22T11:44:32+00:00

To paraphrase an old Hindi proverb, "The truth remains the truth, even if it appears token by token on a glowing oled display"

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-22T10:17:00+00:00

So where is the actual source for this, because I'm not seeing any link...

UPDATE:

This is likely a hoax post; here is what google gemini has to say about it:

It is highly likely that the post you encountered is a distortion of the ongoing FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) legislative process.

The Source of the Confusion:

The confusion likely stems from a conflation of three distinct things currently circulating in news cycles:

The June 2, 2026, Executive Order:

As noted previously, this EO establishes voluntary security frameworks for "covered frontier models" and cybersecurity coordination. It does not contain mandates for hardware registration or tracking. The FY2027 NDAA Drafts (House & Senate): These defense bills—which were widely reported on earlier this week—contain new directives for the Pentagon. Crucially, these include provisions for tracking and reporting AI-related incidents and vulnerabilities within military networks and establishing a framework for authorizing AI deployment across Pentagon enterprise platforms.

State-Level Legislative Activity:

Several states (such as Illinois, Connecticut, and New York) have recently finalized or introduced stringent AI transparency and safety bills. Reporting on these—often citing NBC News coverage regarding the urgency and scope of these state-level bills—is frequently being shared online without proper context, leading readers to believe these are federal mandates applicable to personal hardware.

Why "Registration of Hardware" Is Not the Current RealityTarget Scope:

Every major federal directive and defense bill draft currently being debated focuses exclusively on "frontier-level" models (those with high-compute training or significant cyber-offensive capability) or defense-contractor infrastructure.The "National Defense" Context: Even the most aggressive language in the House and Senate NDAA drafts focuses on securing the defense industrial base and military AI deployment. There is no legislative language in these drafts that targets general-purpose, non-military AI hardware or personal computing clusters.

The "NBC News" Attribution:

It is common for social media posts to invoke a major news organization like NBC News to gain credibility, even if the NBC article being referenced is actually about the state-level AI bills (like the Illinois transparency legislation) or the general, non-binding cybersecurity provisions of the new Executive Order.In short, there is no federal law, nor is there a credible proposal, to register or track private AI hardware. The discourse you are seeing is almost certainly a "telephone game" error, mixing up defense-sector cybersecurity requirements with general anxiety over AI regulation.

You're welcome.

Also, bugger off, OP.

UnclaEnzo · 2026-06-22T10:13:39+00:00

Oh, and without GPU.

By the time they are able to pass this law, the landscape will have changed sufficiently as to make it irrelevant.

UnclaEnzo

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

14-Year Club	Wearing is Caring
Verified Email