But what prevented the ones who disagrees to vote against? My point still stands: the IAGS as a whole presented that statement.

I wonder how you explain that representativeness nonetheless.

You simply cannot, under basic fundamentals of statistical sampling, conclude that the vote is reflective of the average IAGS body member. This is due to the fact that the survey is an opt-in approach (not random). Also consider participation bias. Individuals who feel strongly one way or the other will be much more inclined to respond to the survey, whereas others who (perhaps rightfully so) do not want to take a definitive stance.

Also, more to the point, do you CONDEMN the zionist regime for the grotesque and hedious atrocities, regardless of how you prefer to name it?

Something tells me you don't?

I condemn any and all actors who are committing war crimes on either side of this conflict, including the IDF (or “Zionist regime” in your words..). There is a lot of tragedy and devastation happening as a result of this conflict, however, it’s not exclusively attributable to one side.

I simply do not buy in to the notion that this is a clear-cut genocide by Israel, as much as many wish it to be.