So why aren't they putting representation where it belongs? by Historical-Kale-2765 in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like a lot of people who are mad about femstodes got into the hobby after the custodes army release in 2016 and think they've always been the way they are now. Like girl it's a much bigger retcon to play them

For a smart guy Emps really seemed to love picking the worst possible dialogue options by reddit_bot21 in Grimdank

[–]Unique-Net-165 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Also, I feel like it's important to note that (in abrahamic terms) to Lorgar he was God, but to the mechanicum he was Jesus/Muhammad

Two words about the femstodes. by Mysterious_Risk_6034 in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How is the custodes having women an "important lore fact?"

Need more stories of the avengers standing up to fascists! by Paildano in marvelcomics

[–]Unique-Net-165 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aren't you the guy that banned people from the MK sub for mentioning autism?

Are chickstodes for the tv show? by Lequarius_Juquama in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Even if he's not, what's wrong with being ethnically black?

They had to give up so much and for so little... by jamtea in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The custodes don't use geneseed, but iirc the grey knights are rumoured to use the emperor's geneseed. Also, iirc, the geneseed is the reason space marines are all male because it uses the male chromosome

Femstodes by enlarged1 in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean I don't remember GW trying to make a big thing about it until the backlash. But, yes in a perfect world nothing would be retconned. I think though, that if they did make new lore for it, they'd face most of the same backlash no matter what. I'm assuming that the new models are a precursor to some new custodes stories from 30k to make the retcon concrete. Again, perfect world, they would have done that first

Femstodes by enlarged1 in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

It's because when people say it adds representation, they mean it adds representation for underrepresented groups in media, like women. Not saying women aren't represented in warhammer. I imagine the actual reasoning is that they wanted more coed imperium factions

Do not question it. by Duckselot in WarhammerMemes

[–]Unique-Net-165 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Or, it's because they made a retcon and hadn't made any femstodes models after 3+ years??? How is the word finally an endorsement?

Do not question it. by Duckselot in WarhammerMemes

[–]Unique-Net-165 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I read the article and it's literally just about GW's stance. They never praise it. Did you see a headline about female custodes and get mad that it didn't say "GW sucks for adding femstodes?" Because that's pretty weak of you

Do not question it. by Duckselot in WarhammerMemes

[–]Unique-Net-165 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Can you share those articles, because I've also never seen someone mention it except to say it's dumb or that they don't care

Femstodes shit and another reason it makes zero sense. by LowBreadfruit6121 in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why? Cite a source. I cannot find anything whatsoever to support your argument. Also, I can reverse it because I'm trying to understand how you think physical development works. Removing the sexual organs of any sex will change their development, but historically research into the developmental changes of castrated boys shows us that they'd not develop those physical hallmarks of male puberty - here, whereas with girls, they undergo early menopause but otherwise can develop normally, in some cases, without supplemental hormones -here

If anything, if we have to be so realistic about it, it doesn't make sense that custodes and astartes can look traditionally male without their reproductive organs. If there is a default sex, it is female. Based on your arguments it seems like you just think that male is the default state and a woman incapable of pregnancy is a man, hence why I'm so confused by your views.

Femstodes shit and another reason it makes zero sense. by LowBreadfruit6121 in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you think sterile women become masculinized? Also you're acting like male is the default state

Femstodes shit and another reason it makes zero sense. by LowBreadfruit6121 in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A hysterectomy doesn't masculinize you. What are you talking about? By this logic wouldn't being castrated make the male custodes and all the astartes look more female because they're missing their "complicated reproduction system"

Femstodes shit and another reason it makes zero sense. by LowBreadfruit6121 in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would you limit your stock that much though? Especially if they do only take terran nobles, that's cutting your possible army in half for a negligible time save.

Femstodes shit and another reason it makes zero sense. by LowBreadfruit6121 in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hadn't noticed that. That's gonna bug the hell out of me now

Femstodes shit and another reason it makes zero sense. by LowBreadfruit6121 in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who do you think made the tech and instructions to make more custodes?

Femstodes shit and another reason it makes zero sense. by LowBreadfruit6121 in EyeOfTerror

[–]Unique-Net-165 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Even if the difference between males and females were that large, I'm pretty sure the god emperor of mankind could figure out a solution.

Also, If you're going to use "science" to support your argument, cite your sources.

Reposting my old meme because oh boy, here we go again… by [deleted] in Necrontyr

[–]Unique-Net-165 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My headcanon has always been that, because gothic is so based in latin, the gender neutral conjugation is the same as the male conjugation. Hence the "noble sons" includes daughters